Alek

Banned for free trial farming perfect magic Banned for free trial farming perfect fighter

Banned for free trial farming Banned for free trial farming Banned for free trial farming Banned for ban evading Same account as datinass Same account as chocoloco

This has already been done at a competitor bot when I used to be a scripter there (2013), again since I've left, and at least one time at OSBot. Not difficult, typically the person running it will give a script to players and have them run it for a few hours while they actually play the game. From that they can determine a bunch of things. Like I said though, it's already been done. There is nothing on these forums which hasn't been thought of and implemented - which hasn't been done in 15 years. Edit: At least the majority of "new suggestions" and "new ideas", it's the same round of people who are new to botting re-suggesting the same stuff.

Can't be banned using private script - no variables are shared with any other script. This means your script and profile is unique. My private script has secret interaction method and sleep pattern. Cannot be detected. Human mouse movement and ABC Level 4302. Want to bank swordfish? How about we check your stats. Want to harpoon a fishing spot? Maybe now is a good time to hop worlds.

http://lmgtfy.com/?q=runescape+bot+mouse+detection http://lmgtfy.com/?q=runescape+bot+human+mouse+movement

This was back in 'nam days, like 2003-2004. One day I was scammed, someone sold me a member's account for like 3K gp - which was my entire back and a TON of money. But it seemed like a great investment. TLDR, password he gave me was too long and didnt even fit the damn login screen. After I sent a complaint for my items back and the user to be banned, and alas inaction - I decided to scam myself. What I would do is carry around a lot of juicy loot, I'm talking big bucks like adamant scimitars and rune daggers. I'd bring people to Falador in that little village thing, to an upstairs apartment. There would be a dresser that you can open, like a drawer would pop out. I'd tell them that I found a glitch. You would open the drawer, blow a kiss (emote), type your password, then search the drawers. I'd act amazed and spam chat, then show them my rune dagger. They would also freak out, because mind you this is early 2000s - rune items were top tier. They would do it and say it didn't work. I'd say try logging out and then back in - badda bing badda boom. Just like that I would clear their mithril armor and flip it in an underground market of fences and thieves. Eventually I would be banned with a full set of Rune armor, which completely destroyed me as a human being for a few months.

Banned your accounts: @randomrambo @Dopechickwee @sparkieguest94 @LargonPargon @randomtitchie @Titchie

Banned for multiple accounts

Banned both your accounts

Banned all your accounts for free trial farming

Banned for free trial farming

Name one suggestion that you believe hasn't been tried before.

Bans in a nutshell: Write a private script and only use it for yourself, write in all the antiban and bullshit you can dream of. Bot until you get banned. Come on the forums and tell other people that your antiban method worked .

TIL randomization = human behavior

I wonder how ABCL50 is working out.

You may have Java 8 installed, but the JRE is being started in some other version. From command line (Windows or Unix): java -version:1.8 -jar "osbot 2.5.8.jar" This will ensure the jvm starts in version 1.8 [Java 8]

I guarantee you that InteractionEvent does not have an infinite loop, if thats the question you were asking by reading your title.

The random is completely useless. You're going to be returning the same sleep every single time (~500ms) because it's conditional with a 50ms recheck. Just save yourself the trouble and only add a timeout of 3000ms.

Sorry but scripters aren't allowed to advertise antiban as I find this to be scamming. Please consider a different botting community where this is allowed.

Not a mirror mode developer, please don't tag me for these types of issues.

You're absolutely right, there will be absolutely no noticeable difference in the end. However more methods doesn't really equate to cleaner code. If he only uses that method once (maybe even twice), then it probably shouldn't be a method.

Well he's trying to "experiment" something that's already been experimented for 15 years. Just search for "bot runescape mouse movement".

Use item.interact(), it chooses a random point in the item bounds anyways. If you're asking this question, then you probably should be using the API methods. To specifically answer your question, 1 method. Each method is an extra jump in memory, which is more expensive. It's not really worth writing two separate methods for this.

What was the control to your experiment?

Stuff to learn: -Pointers -Pass by reference vs pass by value -Creating objects on the heap -Creating objects on the stack -Creating containers of pointers to avoid object slicing*