extatus

Is this how mafia works?

Dont use injection, dont use proxies and keep it low-profile. Preferably use a ghost mouse and try not to attempt something stupid like 15 hr sessions. You should be fine then.

NMZ

Just trying to come up with some thought: Maybe ur IP adressess were clearly distinguishable, with an exception of each one just having a different subnet? example: Maybe the accs were created under same IP or u have accidental packet traffic from home IP. Then again, it's a question of linking them together. Or could it be that u used a single botting method for all bots? Since u were using a proxy, getting flagged is much easier. In a very rare instance does a legit player use VPN & proxy. If all the bots get group-flagged in some heavily monitored place, its rip.

If youre not a goldfarmer and the network identifier isnt coming from sone datacenter proxy i wouldnt worry at all. Public wifi is a thing and they wouldnt flag anyone if some1 was casually botting in schools wifi for example and got banned. Personally ive botted fine with previous ban record on static ip address.

Hardly a factor when botter is already flagged & analysed with ML & subject to manual review the next day.

Hard to tell. If your idea lies on the spectrum of a mobile color bot, try and find someone who can do it in the first place(e.g frostbug or swizzbeat. Should you fancy something like a custom reflection client... just ditch the idea lol. Maybe the project is doable with current API methods provided by OSBOT? I would talk to someone trusted first.

Non VIPs are limited to just one instance. Suppose u have an average modern pc that has atleast i5 cpu, running 6-8 is just fine. Use injection and low cpu mode. And dont use scripts that throw exceptions left and right.

240 bots thats pretty insane, some worlds in RS average less than that.. will you plan on a large-scale p2p farm in future? imagine adding a bond mule and item supplier link - some cartel action

oh hai

I am already using CLI with -norandoms and have custom login handler in place. My script is set-up so that bots are grouped. I'd like to keep similar roles to one client instance. (4x on 1 client) (5x on 2nd.. etc),

Hi. Is there a way to disable auto login after script has executed? I only need auto-login for first logon, then custom break handler takes over. I cant reference credentials if bot names arent visible.. I think account selection data is encrypted and any gui attempt at login screen will throw npe's. thoughts?

tip: try to tele lumb and see what interrupts the animation. Auto-retaliate on-off toggle would work & should be the "safest"

crumb & c engineer & SirPugger if you're into pking then salladpker

Hes using eclipse.

I stand corrected. In that case, you're completely right .

Just to clarify, as i posted that in 5 am. :lol: As Haysae mentioned, the onLoop is already an endless loop. If your script breaks to ping fluctuation or script not looping perfectly, using >0 return values means artificially recreating slugginess that is completely unnecessary. If the script skips lines, it mightn't find your condition on the first try. On top of that, if the script were fairly simple and did 1-2 actions before naturally looping again, the outcome would be sluggy anyway.

on point

And what scripts did you use?

the scriptmanifest has a missing parameter logo version = 0, logo = "") more: getAnimation == -1 is same as !if(myPlayer().isAnimating() { i would avoid returning the value 444 or anything else than 0, the script needs to work like clockwork because logic will break + the bot will be sluggish (it adds up weird pattern characteristics on top ) use conditional sleeps on condition, static sleeps are more or less used for debugging conditional sleeps make sure that if your latency spikes or irrelevant event occurs, ur script still sleeps --> very until the condition is done

The general philiosophy here is that one should use GUI only out of necessity. Drawing UIs on seperate thread is rather performance heavy. While it might not seem as such, any extra optimization helps bot farms. Cool conspect though, I like it. ?

Not via the official client... yes if you were to set up a 3rd party proxy client such as proxifier.. but i figured most people dont do that.

Theres your problem. Stop using proxies. Mirror doesn't allow that - that's where the majority of inconclusive evidence comes from.

There is no defintive proof that mirror works better than injection. It has already been repeated countless times that Jagex can determine useage of a third party, while doing so- they're not able to see which client you are using. Mirror client might delay a potential flag, thats all. I've run injection for months, and it all comes down to other factors. Clients like RuneLite are already indistinguishable from a botting client. It has snowballed into this: https://static.runelite.net/api/runelite-api/

It is the script, network traffic, total playtime, account age,activities and many other variables that determined your ban. Injection client is safe.