Jump to content

Gunman

Super Moderator
  • Posts

    3448
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    17
  • Feedback

    100%

Everything posted by Gunman

  1. You don't download the script. You download the client and all scripts will load into the script selector after you login and launch a client. https://i.gyazo.com/c51047c640b29e335657900544be973a.mp4
  2. Are you talking about downloading the client with the download button at the top left of the screen?
  3. You'd probably love the Dark Reader browser extension then Can break some websites and make some of the elements invisible though. Dark mode google is a life savior for my eyes
  4. Gunman

    MirrorClient v6.0

    #1 The idea of mirror was that no code was to be injected into the client so it won't be "marked" as a 3rd party client. Runelite injects into the client, defeating the purpose of mirror. #2 Adding proper proxy support would require injecting into the client.
  5. Probably because Mirror has some kind of GPU usage while Stealth Injection doesn't.
  6. Do you have anything like MSI Afterburner or Riva Tuner open? If so try closing them and seeing if the problem goes away or persists.
  7. @kr0nex As far as I know it's something to do with hardware acceleration. I am thinking a setting in the Nvidia control should be able to fix this, but I do not know for sure. A couple pictures below of my Nvidia settings. And my PhysX Setting is set to Auto-Select. Could try changing it to CPU and see if it makes a difference.
  8. You have VIP and botting a single account, should of used mirror mode.
  9. Webwalker will load all the data to walk anywhere in the game. Loading this data is what causes the ram increase, it only needs to load once per client session. Local walking doesn't load this data. Short answer, yes the ram will be reduced compared to web walking.
  10. @BloodyNoah WebWalking is a Global walker, it utilizes a large sum of data which can increase a clients ram by 300-500MB(This was planned to switch over to server side no idea if it's still planned or not, check OSBot V3 thread). The idea is you can walk to nearly any location in game from any location by just putting getWalking.webWalk(Location); Normal Walker can be utilized to create your own walking paths to help reduce ram consumption consumed by web walking. Or be used to just walk 10 tiles nearby instead of using the WebWalker. But if you want to walk from Varrock to Falador you will have to create your own path or use WebWalking; Since it will only use the tiles that are rendered to the client(Think this distance varies and can be anywhere from 15-24 tiles away). TL;DR Webwalking greatly increases client ram. Normal walker has to build your own walk paths from scratch.
  11. @BloodyNoah Only works on injection. It lowers the game frame rate to lower CPU usage. In low activity tasks this can work really well like bank standing. But something more intensive like combat may suffer greatly from it.
  12. What makes me so great, I am unpredictable that way
  13. Better Super Mod than @Space, here to cuck him out of a win
  14. Gunman

    AIO MTA

    If @Eagle Scripts is checking for exact capitalization then "Jug of Wine" should be "Jug of wine" if you're not doing that already
  15. Try deleting osbot folder or disabling any 3rd party anti-virus. OSBot folder location -> C:\Users\<Your Computer Username>\OSBot
  16. If you have Microsoft Onedrive installed uninstall it
  17. @Anakim Mentioning other botting clients Isn't allowed. Think the filter got them all though. Speaking on the topic of your question, Mirror isn't Reflection, Injection is still just as good if not better if done well enough, and all the implementations are done differently for each client so some results vary. If you're only botting like 4 or less accounts use Mirror, any more than that than on OSBot you need to use Injection as Mirror wasn't really meant for farming and is a hassle to deal with a high number of clients.
  18. Had a similar thing, but on Jagex's official client and received a ban shortly after Tut Island. Pretty sure it was just an unlucky false ban
  19. @UncleDanny Since you wish to keep leaving false feedback and are refusing to participate in the dispute, I will carry on with the information I have at this time. @Khaleesi Feedback removed. Dispute closed.
  20. @UncleDanny Last chance to explain yourself. Why did you leave Negative feedback for Khal? And don't leave negative feedback for me again for giving you a 0 point no penalty warning to let you know I wished for your participation in this dispute.
  21. @UncleDanny Why did you leave negative feed back for scamming? As far I can see in the ticket tool chat everything went fine except it seems you purchased the wrong script.
  22. @CasDeBlanco Sorry for the delay my man, and that was the wrong section better fitted here.
×
×
  • Create New...