-
Posts
210 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Feedback
100%
Everything posted by fhhhphgj
-
3M per account. Discord Macweese#0001 or add through my signature.
-
My advice, if you; don't want to lose the account, don't bot on the account. don't care, then do whatever you feel like. I can't say for a fact what the "cool down" period is but I can only speculate that they will indeed be scrutinising you in the future. The offence will expire 1 year from the date the account was punished. However, I do not believe this means you can get away with botting again. To my knowledge Jagex stopped roll-backing accounts so you should still keep your experience once the account is re-enabled. OT: Does it actually say that; ". . . you will be ban . . ."? I'm not questioning the authenticity just annotating how strange it sounds to my ears grammatically, shouldn't it be ". . . you will be banned . . ."? Also, is it just me or did Jagex ramp up their anti-botting and dish out a lot of bans lately? Feels like there's been an influx of ban posts.
-
I can do 85 for 222M.
-
375M, circa 2 weeks. Can complete within 10 days for higher rate. FYI since you seek Agility for the sake of the high level Revenant Cave shortcut you only need 89 Agility1. Which would save you around 35M and 1 day. 1. https://oldschool.runescape.wiki/w/Shortcuts Discord Macweese#0001 or add me through my signature.
-
That's pretty nice, getting paid while playing RS, do you need to constantly have your phone plugged to a charger? I don't play games on my phone.
-
Can do this for 1M
-
Don't like it. It's a cool idea I suppose and I can see how the rationale behind it can be ratified as a skill in the way it is moulded to accommodate the existing skills etc. However, I simply don't like it. Paradoxically due to the very logical layout of it, inducing a sense of copy-paste from the existing skills(crafting, smithing). I guess its strength is its weakness. Which is why I would much rather see summoning or dungeoneering being "re"-introduced. Almost ironically those two being copy-pasted from the original RuneScape. Despite the copy-paste fact they introduced something new and creative in an excellent fashion in my opinion. I am more inclined to favour dungeoneering over summoning though, as I almost have to agree that summoning while being a great skill just felt a bit too overpowered at times. Dungeoneering on the other hand, good God what an amazing skill if you ask me. I am 100% biased as I am just in love with the skill. Many do view it as a minigame and I could agree. In fact I even log in sometimes from OSRS to RS3 just to do some dungeoneering because I enjoy it so much(even after having gained over 600M XP in it!!!).
-
You can request a new IP from your ISP, you could also spoof your MAC address..
-
If I'm not mistaken I believe he's referring to AutumnElegy. Edit: Welcome back.
-
I've come close to maxing an account all through botting, 2400-something total(2496 max). I never did max it by botting but instead finished it manually. Can't remember exactly why but I believe afraid of being caught was my reasoning. This occurred during the prime era of botting though. IIRC the "project" progressed between 2009-2012 and I used RSBot to begin with but transitioned quickly to ultimately utilise Impulse software's iBot. I can't say for certain although I may have read some threads of maxing accounts 100% through botting. This would have been years ago mind you, I wouldn't think it's possible today however. At least no bot I'm aware of would be capable to accomplish the mission without proper management of breaks and so forth. Maybe it's possible but extremely improbable, and a difficult task. Kind of like trying to get a third age from a clue. If you rely on extremely proficiently written scripts you might be able to pull it off. God bless the Snellmans, their work was incredible, really. Now I'm not sure if Jagex's anti-bot system was flawed or if Impsoft's work really were that impeccable. I remember starting using iBot in 2010 and by 2011 I would be running up to 40 accounts months on end 24/7 up until 2012, none of them were ever caught.
-
You mean agility?
-
Don't feel I have to justify playing RuneScape. I do it because I enjoy it. Sure I could do something more productive with my time but I have no pressure on me to do so, Thankfully I can afford to be lazy and irresponsible in that sense. After all, I've been playing since early 2003 - during the time I've had to pause my RuneScape adventure multiple times whenever the circumstances require me to.
-
Personally I've always remained faithful to PayPal. Not to say I haven't tried other payment services but I've found that PayPal is simple enough to use and it has embedded itself to be my default payment method. Whenever the dreaded situation arises: there is no PayPal payment option I start sweating. Those moments I vividly recall this being the case the prominent options were those such as Skrill, G2A1 PaySafeCard and recently crypto. I've only used Skrill once or twice. In fact, I was forced to turn to Skrill due to my PayPal being maxed out along with my cards. Although I cannot properly give an overall judgement of Skrill as a payment service my opinion of it is positive nonetheless simply because of that instance. A quick rundown of PayPal as a payment method Chargeback fees Contacting customer service can be a challenging endeavor Seller protection does not extend to digital goods2 Overall a good payment platform, essentially an online bank I myself haven't really had any significant issues though, no chargebacks, customer service decent I suppose(they contacted me no later than any other customer service would). PayPal has a 4-5% +X fee compared to Skrill's 3% +X I've read someplace that PayPal will freeze your funds if you are caught online gambling3 and you need a license or notify PayPal of this in advance whereas Skrill doesn't care. From my experience in payment portals PayPal is almost always listed as an option, where Skrill is not equally as common. In your case, or in the case of your customer rather, it can be the result of recent policy changes on either of the services. In the form of changed fees, rates or other similar aspects of the service which enticed them to switch over. The location where they are based could also play a roll as each service has different adjustments to their service. If it's not an issue you could ask the individual(s) why they've made the transition to Skrill from PayPal. 1. I personally highly discourage and will always advise against using G2A since it's by far the most troublesome service and IIRC reading on multiple occasions troublesome facts about them. Mainly on HLTV and reddit. 2. This is to my knowledge from the last time I read their terms of service. Check this is still accurate as they could have changed it sometime after. 3. I'm not 100% sure on this, best if you check this for yourself. Hope this helps
-
1. What warrants the use of a middleman? 1.1. Trade value 1.2. Parties involved 2. What is the most important aspect of a middleman? Integrity and credibility I have never used an MM. Regretfully, there have been instances where I'd wish one had been used. ~2008 scammed for ~€300 ~2011 scammed for 3B. RSGP ~2013 scammed for ~€800 Thankfully these are really the only times I've lost any "substantial" amount. The only time other than this would probably be something in-game IIRC I was scammed for a rune set back in 2003, no big deal really. Common denominators in every recountable scam; haste and naïveté. Question and research what you are trading, who you are trading with etc. Scrutinize and double-, triple-check the contents of the trade. Is it imperative to commit to this specific trade/trader? Is it forced(i.e. trade now or no trade)? Who is the buyer/seller; are they reputable? Is it reasonable for your counterpart to risk scamming? Does it sound too good to be true? Naturally it's easy to get comfortable and overlook common precautionary measures, especially if you don't consider the trade to be valuable(in proportion to your perception: a 200M OSRS GP trade can be a lot to you or not) or if you consider the person you're trading with to be trustworthy e.g. if you've traded with them before smoothly or they're reputable within a community. Receiving before delivering is hands down the best solution for YOU in the trade. Introducing a 3rd party by using a verified middle-man is another great tool for lowering the risk for all parties involved. This can be in the form of a person, or an established organization/business (e.g. PlayerAuctions). The moment you want to believe in the good in people and let down your guard is the moment they will stab you. In the end, as grim as it may sound, you cannot trust anyone. This is underlined when money is involved. I'm aware this sounds a lot like paranoia and Mean World Syndrome however it is undoubtedly the best precaution to being scammed and what I've learned from my mistakes. Just my two cents. Happy and safe trading
-
http://www.lmgtfy.com/?s=d&q=Oldschool+runescape+range+tank+guide
-
Mentioned above, outline pixelated and my eyes itch because of it, please fix. Curious why the logo isn't in gold/yellow, to match the VIP theme? Maybe you'll change that after you get $100 donor/verified pip ?
-
-
Learned Java in high school and a lot is self taught too I suppose.
-
My bad 2005* and you're right about that
-
Playing legit on a lot of accounts. I also script some private stuff to use for fun and experiment while doing AFK-able skills like fishing, mining, woodcutting etc.
-
Been buying and selling gold since 2008 never been banned for RWT. Just lucky I guess
-
Question about Priest in Peril, Monk of Zamorak fight
fhhhphgj replied to Erradicated's topic in Runescape
No creo que puedas hacerlo sin ganar ningún nivel. Puedes intentar usar veneno. Creo que deberías intentar usar el inglés en el foro, después de todo logrameis escribir el título en inglés. I do not think you can do it without gaining any levels. You can try using poison. I think you should try to use English in the forum, after all you manage to write the title in English. -
PaySafeCard is an option.