Swizzbeat

6205 9mm revolver false 2521 0 -1 [Wear, Drop] [Take] 8699 Whoopsie false 2521 0 -1 [Wear, Drop] [Take] lol

Considering you have Sponsor, and Sponsor has privileges than VIP, someone please tell me why 's VIP would let him change thread titles instead of his $100 donor status? I'm not sure why the question of whether his VIP or donor status allows it even came up.

What's your offer for a $70 iTunes card?

I'm only warning you because if you start selling scripts people will bitch you out for crappy paints. It's a completely retarded argument but they are the ones buying the product

Can non scripters please stop spamming up the SCRIPTING HELP section? Thanks. I suggest learning Java (most importantly what a null value is) as the error you're having is extremely simple. Not only that but you should learn how to read stack traces because it's telling you exactly where your error is and for what reason.

If it looks good, which yours might if it covered the entire chatbox instead of looking like it was randomly placed there.

I agree with everything here. I've noticed that recently the amount of users has been increasing, to bad that growth won't flourish. OSBot could have been the biggest bot on the market but the people who run it are completely retarded (besides @Alek of course, I'm not sure why he still wastes his talents here). Not once have I seen any sort of advertising technique being used by the staff or even a simple community event (no that shitty ridle hunt or whatever you want to call it doesn't count). Oh, and weren't we supposed to have a completely new domain name with RS3 bot support like 2 months ago? And webwalking over a year ago? It's pathetic seeing the administration kill their own product.

http://www.solarmovie.is/

An easier way would just be to implement the class. This way you can create your own listener class which handles the overrides and keep your project organized.

If the bot continually drinks the first potion it finds that WILL be the lowest dose (assuming there's no interaction from the player or movement of inventory items). Even so it's extremely easy to just parse the dose and keep the slot with the lowest dose in memory.

Tough love my friend, tough love.

Social skills? This is the internet young buck. @OP my actual response still stands. Iterate over the inventory items until you find something with "prayer potion" or whatever in it (and add a check to make sure it doesn't contain "super" if you don't want supers ) and interact.

Erm I'm pretty sure I can criticize whatever/whoever I want, as can anyone else. We both know that a single inventory check is the optimal way to go, versus (worst case scenario) four inventory iterations. Just like everyone has their own way of coding, they also have their own helping style.

What in the hell Why make things so needlessly complex when you can just iterate over the inventory, check if the item name contains prayer potion, and if it does drink it? Should also return a boolean based on if the interaction (if there was any) was successful or not.

As far as I know OSBot does not xboot and instead injects into the gamepack and runs the game off that modified jar. Any Jagex requests they send out to detect whether there is injected code in the jar (such as getPlayer(), getCameraYaw(), etc.) are routed to the unmodified jars class loader. Also, it seems like you're confused about what xbooting actually is. It doesn't actually modify rt.jar but instead looks for rt.jar class overrides found with the xbooting jar file that it will use instead of the defaults. If you actually modified the rt.jar files you'd have to delete and reinstall Java since things relying on the default Java functionality wouldn't work (assuming you did something drastic to one of the classes).

Distribute it here so we can be sure you're not attempting blackhat activity.

What in the fuck

You should really be using a boolean to determine whether the start button has been pushed (with an accessor, I hate when people make things static "because it works"). Checking for if the GUI is visible is a terrible choice, as you should always make decisions based on the source of truth (in this case the start button).Also, work on your variable names. "theSource" for an array of rune names makes no sense what so ever.

Ezpz

Create a new GUI instance in your script class...?

No way those are real.

Sounds like you have one hell of a drive, keep going! If there's one thing I've learned these past few months it's that continuous hard work pays off. That's exactly my point my mistake if it was worded poorly.

Sell it, would you rather have a keepsake gathering dust or cash? The point behind your years of study should have been to learn as much as you can, not do well on some test that hundreds of thousands of people have passed.

This is the same thing as above but even worse. I really don't see why people insist on making their code unreadable just because "it saves lines". I know the ternary is actually slower in C# when compared to nested if statements because of the JIT trying to make optimizations, not sure about Java.

You actually went in? Normally I just stand outside and stare at the sexy chick posters while she does her thing.