Leaderboard
Popular Content
Showing content with the highest reputation on 03/13/14 in all areas
-
This looks like Python and PHP attempted to have a child and it came out retarded.3 points
-
As long as its kept to 30 minute per post, I find it fine. I mean c'mon, this is a OSRS related site.2 points
-
v1.7.87 Updated: Prayer configs Added: (hopefully these remain stable) ObjectDefinition: getModifiedModelColors(), getOriginalModelColors() NPCDefinition: getHeadIcon(), getOriginalModelColors(), getModifiedModelColors() ItemDefinition: getUnnotedId(), getModelId(), getNotedId(), getOriginalModelColors(), getModifiedModelColors() Hopefully, hopefully I didn't miss anything.2 points
-
Format: Member: Jordan Feedback on activity: Active Abusive or Non Abusive?: Non Abusive What could Jordan improve on?: Not sure, seems fine to me Does Jordan handle situations well?: Yes Anything else?: Member: Mikasa Feedback on activity: Active Abusive or Non Abusive?:Non abusive What could Mikasa improve on?: Same as Jordan Does Mikasa handle situations well?: Yusss Anything else?: Member: Smart Feedback on activity: Active Abusive or Non Abusive?: Non abusive What could Smart improve on?: Nothing Does Smart handle situations well?: Yeeeees Anything else?: Member: Gilgad Feedback on activity: Active Abusive or Non Abusive?:Non Abusive What could Gilgad improve on?: Spend more time talking to me in chat Does Gilgad handle situations well?: Yes yes! Anything else?: Member: Raflesia Feedback on activity: Active Abusive or Non Abusive?:Non abusive What could Raflesia improve on?: Nothing Does Raflesia handle situations well?: Yesss Anything else?: Member: Arctic Feedback on activity: Active Abusive or Non Abusive?: non abusive What could Arctic improve on?: Not sure, seems like a nice guy, haven't spoken to him as of yet. Does Arctic handle situations well?: Not sure. Anything else?: Member: Eliot Feedback on activity: Active Abusive or Non Abusive?: Non abusive What could Eliot improve on?: Not sure, maybe be a bit more lenient with the kicking sometimes i.e prior warnings Does Eliot handle situations well?: Yes Anything else?: Member: Nick Feedback on activity: Active Abusive or Non Abusive?: Non abusive What could Nick improve on?: Not sure, maybe the same as Eliot, both good guys, don't know em too well yet though Does Nick handle situations well?: Yes Anything else?: Overall the staff team is looking good, you all seem to be doing a fine job and getting a long. Keep it up ^^ Although on the subject of disputes, maybe the trials/globals should let the supers + deal with them, otherwise if they don't have someone online to contact with access to the CP, that person can only receive a warning point ban, when scammers need IP bans to prevent further scamming and so on. But if the rules have changed since I've resigned, ignore me and keep doing what you're doing ^^2 points
-
I personally think all marketing should be banned from the chat at all times. There is a HUGE market section on the forums and we would love for the forums to be more active with users participating. No one comes in the chat looking for a service, most of the time it is users that come to troll and just shoot the shit, or leechers coming in to ask for support. No one wants to see a service thread.2 points
-
Whatever Just Basic is, I can assure you that you will never use it later in life. I went on their website, and it looks to me as a sorry excuse to make money. According to http://justbasic.com/learnmore.html, for $50 you get access to the Windows API and and/or external DLLs. Things like that should come for free in a programming language. If you look at any major programming language (Java, C, C++, C#, Python, PHP, Perl, Ruby, the list goes on and on), where you can write any code you want for free, the idea of having to pay extra for capabilities because they were limited on purpose purely to make money is ludicrous and reeks of money grubbing idiots. You should try to see if you can learn in a different language. I hear Python is a good place to start, though I myself started learning C# first, then adopted Java as my main language.2 points
-
I'd much rather see adverting be completely banned from the chat as it's useless spam and if people wanted services they'd go to the market forum. No from me.2 points
-
It's a different story if you're looking for quest items, they're hard as heck to find. Generally if it just comes in as normal chat and not advertisement I don't mind at all. But advertisement, nah, that's what zybez and Merch bots are for.2 points
-
What are feelings? In all honesty, I don't like messing with the forums too much, that's why we have Maldesto and Raflesia!2 points
-
I agree, some scripters are in it just for the experience and not for the money (very slim amount).2 points
-
Sure I have five minutes. @ScriptManifest(name = "Demo 3", info = "Demoooo", version = 1.0, author = "DeadCommon") public class Demo3 extends Script { NPC[] attackable; @Override public int onLoop() throws InterruptedException { attackable = getAllAttackableNPC("Guard", "Goblin", "Cow", "Chicken"); return 550; } @Override public void onPaint(Graphics arg0) { if (attackable != null) { boolean closest = true; for (NPC next : attackable) if (next != null) { arg0.setColor(closest ? Color.GREEN : Color.RED); arg0.drawPolygon(next.getPosition().getPolygon(bot)); closest = false; } } } public NPC[] getAllAttackableNPC(String... arg0) { List<NPC> cache = client.getLocalNPCs(); if (cache == null || cache.isEmpty()) return null; // No NPCs found (whatsoever) final Player me = myPlayer(); for (Iterator<NPC> i = cache.iterator(); i.hasNext(); ) { NPC next = i.next(); if (next == null || !next.exists() || !contains(arg0, next.getName()) || next.getHealth() == 0 || (next.getFacing() != null && !next.isFacing(me))) i.remove(); } if (cache.isEmpty()) return null; // No valid NPCs filtered Collections.sort(cache, new Comparator<NPC>() { @Override public int compare(NPC o1, NPC o2) { return new Integer(o1.getPosition().distance(me.getPosition())) .compareTo(new Integer(o2.getPosition().distance( me.getPosition()))); } }); return cache.toArray(new NPC[cache.size()]); } public static boolean contains(String[] a, String b) { if (a == null || a.length == 0 || b == null || b.isEmpty()) return false; else for (String next : a) if (next != null && !next.isEmpty() && next.equals(b)) return true; return false; } }2 points
-
The Veteran rank should stay, it cannot go. It's partly the reason I'm still here.2 points
-
The reason why you made this topic is because you really want the color from the sdn rank.2 points
-
I understand where you're coming from. I was told that we could do it to the best that our power allowed us to. If needed, a Super Moderator+ can easily be reached now-a-days to issue an IP ban within a reasonable time period. In regards to @Gilgad, perhaps that needs to be clarified. That is not what I was told and I will definitely need to make sure of it before continuing. I have not been told that what I've been doing thus far has been incorrect, so I guess it's just a natural habit for me to keep going, however I don't want to be under a false impression as well.1 point
-
Erm... it appears I read this way wrong. Please excuse my idiocy. :lol:1 point
-
1 point
-
1 point
-
I would. The 30 minute rule should apply. Sometimes you're just looking for small things like 1k Nats or something like that, and the chats are a pretty convenient place to do that since we're all a big (distant) family.1 point
-
The Disputes subforum shouldn't have another subforum named pending in my opinion. The disputes should be posted in Disputes rather than pending even existing. The subforum shouldn't be a container/category for just one other subsection1 point
-
1 point
-
I disagree. Users should be allowed to post their threads in just the "Dispute" section, then after a staff member looks into it and starts providing proper instruction it should be sent to the pending section. Without this there would be no organization at all within the dispute section.1 point
-
It was always intended to be unlimited for all scripters, but apparently that wasn't the case, so that's why it got fixed today.1 point
-
That snippet works pretty well almost out of the box, native closestAttackableNPCForName is a bit buggy it returns not closest npc but first found in the area and npcs underattack. I ran your snippet on chickens and cows worked pretty flawlessly. I have added isInArea support and replaced isUnderAttack with canAttack also added getFacingId to be on safe side1 point
-
Yeah, but I have a ban button I can push IRL. I don't even need the computer.1 point
-
1 point
-
1 point
-
i got red swiggly line under mine_area, can u help?1 point