Jump to content

Leaderboard

Popular Content

Showing content with the highest reputation on 01/03/14 in all areas

  1. Dear community, The download for BETA v1.7.64 is available for download. This should fix an issue for some users who were not able to get the OSRS client downloaded. The OSBot 2 API has been getting many updates, we hope to finish this up soon. Sincerely, OSBot.org
    5 points
  2. 5 points
  3. Gilgad is moderator? Uh...? Didn't he scam while he was drunk? Yeah... he did... Sure he payed him back, but so has everyone else with the TWC. Shouldn't he at least have TWC? And why should someone who scammed be able to become moderator, even if he paid back? Discuss. (I have nothing against you Gilgad, but this isn't fair)
    5 points
  4. Yea or you'll end up like me.... Walking around Karmjara jungle lost for like two fucking hours, for no apparent reason...
    3 points
  5. Come at me brah, grats to for being the 500th sexy person.
    2 points
  6. No offense but the api is so messy it is very hard to find, please do point me in the right direction. Oh you call it getFacing? Fucking Laz with his weird naming it drives me crazy
    2 points
  7. The main focus at this moment for OSBot 2 lies in making sure we have organized and covered every part of the planned API. The moment we release we can't refactor existing code anymore. Because we want OSBot 2 to have a very intuitive API, besides the performance gains, we are making sure we are not missing anything.
    2 points
  8. this thread sux massive cawk yo
    2 points
  9. Why is there a kid who apparently should have TWC even a member of the staff in the first place.
    2 points
  10. ヽ༼ຈل͜ຈ༽ノ raise your mod team ヽ༼ຈل͜ຈ༽ノ
    2 points
  11. Why does the staff team not know the rules enforced by Maldesto then? Even he doesn't obey them. If someone has scammed and repayed, then they get TWC. And to give someone moderator right after them being unbanned? AND when they deserve TWC? That's a bit fishy if you ask me. I'm just going off of what Gilgad himself, and on a thread he said he did scam but he was drunk.
    2 points
  12. We'll have to do with this as long as it's not hooked, I needed this for my script and I decided to share it with you people. public Entity getInteracting(final org.osbot.script.rs2.model.Character<?> character) { try { final ClassLoader loader = provider.bot.I(); final Field field = loader.loadClass("aw").getDeclaredField("ao"); field.setAccessible(true); final int index = field.getInt(character.instance) * 1850266567; final XClient client = provider.client.instance; if (index == -1) { return null; } else if (index > 32767) { final XPlayer[] players = client.getLocalPlayers(); return new Player(players[index - 32768]); } else { final XNPC[] npcs = client.getLocalNpcs(); return new NPC(npcs[index]); } } catch (final Exception e) { provider.log(e.getMessage()); } return null; } Probably self explanatory but it uses the bots classloader to load class aw (entity/character/actor) and retrieve field ao (interacting index). It then changes the modifier of this field to public. If index = -1 (no interacting entity) it returns null, if the index is higher than 32767 (the size of the npc array), the interacting entity is a player and therefor it gets the player array (obviously unmodified) and subtracts 32768 from the index to get the index in the player array. If the index is not higher than 32767 (so 32767 and lower) it'll just get the instance out of the unmodified npc array and return a new NPC. Images:
    1 point
  13. Useless since this is hooked and working fine
    1 point
  14. Like twice but you fart like 20 times when I pull my dick out your ass.
    1 point
  15. Gotta love all the new scripts, good luck sir
    1 point
  16. If you read it carefully, ill explain the situation to you. In here, it says that even due to my ToS I never had to refund the user, HOWEVER I was in the wrong saying that I have good methods of staying unbanned, thus makes my service more trust worthy. I never had to refund, however due to legitimacy, I DID Refund, and ATTEMPTED TO 3 times WITH 75m even though I never had to. The fact saying that I have good methods of staying Unbanned was never in my ToS, which is a contradictory statement, where I said, fair enough, i'll refund him as I feel like a slight dick. After realising that the whole situation was confusing, I made an alias saying that I got drunk and scammed him. Fact is, I never scammed him, I was 100% legit and refunded and tried multiple times, even got to the trade screen and then boom, account locked. The ONLY reason I got TWC in the first place was because there was a dispute thread BECAUSE my inbox was glitched and no messages was popping up from Booty Hunter instructing me of his wishes, NOT BECAUSE I SCAMMED. I was banned because I was unable to refund the 75m within the 24 hour time limit as everyone gets. As soon as I had 75m, I refunded the user AND overpayed. Reasons I shouldn't have TWC: 1) I never scammed, I was legit 100% of the time and refunded until the very end. I lost 275m +5 perfectly built accounts upon this refund yet I decided NOT to walk off with the money, however I refunded him being LEGIT. 2) I am a moderator now and we are not allowed to be involved in the market. 3) I don't own a runescape account, nor play runescape. Reasons why other members should not have their TWC removed: One member that I know of said, why isn't my TWC removed? I asked him what he did, he replied with: I scammed a guy 12m because I was angry I had to refund him due to a failed service, he kept on complaining so I threatened to DDoS him, so I refunded him in the end, but shouldn't my TWC be removed? No. 1) Their situation is 100% different to mine. That is the only reason. Now if you hadn't noticed, the only members that are "complaining" about me are the people who were either Demoted/Got denied Global (Swizz, Gh0st (Who now stopped) and the OP (Who got denied global)/SOME with TWC. This is childish and needs to stop, I have been doing a tremendous job and tried my hardest ever since I got Global Moderator and at some points previously. On day one I spent 14 hours online straight doing error reports and staying in the chat helping all sorts of people. On day two I spent 12 hours online, I spent 6 hours straight moving all of the outdated scripts into the outdated section and PM'd all users. During the other 6 hours, I answered all errors, joined teamviewer with multiple people via PM and I even got someone who complained about me with TWC " to say, "I now know why you got promoted Gilgad, you are amazing at your job and you are always first there to help people". On day three (Today) I have spent 13 hours so far. 7 of those hours were spent dealing with error threads straight, the rest have been with report threads and helping in chat. My help has clearly and easily been shown. So if you people would stop being so childish, It would be greatly appreciated. I will attempt to try my hardest at Global Moderater rank, and in the end of the day, It will not affect your lives one bit, only help it. Not to mention I find this quite hilarious swizz: This was on the "Why was Gilgad banned thread", Now that i'm global.. well his views have clearly changed ;)
    1 point
  17. Global moderators are not allowed to participate in the market so adding TWC to his list of ranks wouldn't matter at all. I'm sure there have been plenty of reasons to give Gilgad moderator. Btw this thread has become more of an overal hate thread and has derailed too much to be taken seriously.
    1 point
  18. Quite false. As a staff team we deliberated about the promotion, we all had a say which lead to a unanimous vote.
    1 point
  19. 1 point
  20. Member scams -> refunds for shits and gigs -> gets mod #osbotlogic Just so everyones aware I got demoted from CBA for making a post that someone who the post wasn't even directed at made a dispute about me using language. Guess this site is ok with scamming but not offending little 5 year olds.
    1 point
  21. pls tomorrow, would be more than awsum to bot whole weekend ;P
    1 point
×
×
  • Create New...