Logic behind Account Selector order?

[sampla]

It's not alphabetic. What determines the order of the accounts in the selector?

[Vilius]

I think its the order you add accounts to it.

[Mikasa]

I think its the order you add accounts to it.

 

i'd assume this as well

[Alek]

The order you add it, not adding sorting.

[sampla]

I think its the order you add accounts to it.

 

 

The order you add it, not adding sorting.

Not for me, it's not.

 

I just tried adding an account again to see where it was placed and it was placed 2nd from the top. Made another one and it was placed 5th. I don't get it.

 

Both email addresses started with the same first letter.

Edited May 4, 2016 by sampla

[EndureCoreNas]

Yeah mine aren't added by the order I add them in either. I wondered this as well, but never asked haha.

[DragonAlpha]

Yeah mine aren't added by the order I add them in either. I wondered this as well, but never asked haha.

 

They're stored in a non-linked hashmap.

 

So the JVM can juggle the order around seemingly randomly when new accounts are added to your database, or existing accounts are removed from the hashmap database.

 

If it were a linked hash map, it would be the exact order you add them in.

 

The JVM does low level optimizations and memory management when deciding where to insert them. It's based on your current RAM state, and other factors.

Edited May 5, 2016 by DragonAlpha

[Botre]

 

The JVM does low level optimizations and memory management when deciding where to insert them. It's based on your current RAM state, and other factors.

 

Don't think so

Edited May 5, 2016 by Botre

[DragonAlpha]

Lol no.

 

A plain Entry array, nothing fancy going on.

 

 

I guess the entries get reordered by magic then. 

[sampla]

I'd love to have this fixed. Quality of life update.

[Botre]

I guess the entries get reordered by magic then. 

 

Edit: no

Edited May 5, 2016 by Botre

[DragonAlpha]

 

 

-EDIT-

Edited May 5, 2016 by DragonAlpha

[Botre]

Valid point. Initial post reworded:

 

So the accounts hashmap's iterator can juggle the order around seemingly randomly. The JVM does low level optimizations and memory management. It's based on your current RAM state, and other factors.

 

Hello world

Edited May 5, 2016 by Botre

[DragonAlpha]

Tin

A hasmap is used. A hashmap does not guarantee order. You referenced the Java doc's iterator as a reference where it says "Iterator does not guarantee order". Well the same documentation in the Hashmap section says the exact same thing for Hashmap.

 

public class HashMap<K,V>

extends AbstractMap<K,V>

implements Map<K,V>, Cloneable, Serializable

Hash table based implementation of the Map interface. This implementation provides all of the optional map operations, and permits null values and the null key. (The HashMap class is roughly equivalent to Hashtable, except that it is unsynchronized and permits nulls.) This class makes no guarantees as to the order of the map

 

 

I can post source code from my decompiler too. Nothing fancy going on.

 

Here is the Iterator:

 

 

 

Here is the underlying consumer:

 

Edited May 5, 2016 by DragonAlpha

[Czar]

edit: I'll post this in suggestions forum instead >.<

Edited May 5, 2016 by Czar