[Dev Build] OSBot 2.4.122/23 - InteractionEvent, WebWalking, Antiban

[Chris]

2 minutes ago, Alek said:

Looks like its working pretty well for you, unless this is a bug report haha. 

Just letting ya know its working =P

[Eagle Scripts]

Nice one!

[k9thebeast]

Fight me bro. No good updates allowed on this bot. Making me fucking mad m8. GJ m8.

[Alen]

Thanks for the update. Keep up the good work.

[Adept]

Sweet update. Although I don't get what harm the moveRandomly() and moveSlightly() methods do. Why not leave them in and leave it up to the scripter whether to use them or not?

Edited May 5, 2017 by Adept

[Chris]

Update @Alek

Compiled in .122 & script ran in .122

Interaction fails when it is a GroundItem

using .interact("Take");.

Issue: it will simply hover over the GroundItem

Confirmed working in .121!

Code:

private Predicate<GroundItem> suitableLoot = g ->
            Constants.lootList.contains(g.getName()) &&
                    context.getMap().realDistance(g) <= 8;
                                                          
final Optional<GroundItem> lootable = context.getGroundItemStream().filter(suitableLoot).findAny();
if (lootable.isPresent()){
    if (lootable.get().interact("Take")){
      //stuff
    }
}

 

[Alek]

11 minutes ago, Chris said:

Update @Alek

Compiled in .122 & script ran in .122

Interaction fails when it is a GroundItem

using .interact("Take");.

Issue: it will simply hover over the GroundItem

Confirmed working in .121!

Code:

private Predicate<GroundItem> suitableLoot = g ->
            Constants.lootList.contains(g.getName()) &&
                    context.getMap().realDistance(g) <= 8;
                                                          
final Optional<GroundItem> lootable = context.getGroundItemStream().filter(suitableLoot).findAny();
if (lootable.isPresent()){
    if (lootable.get().interact("Take")){
      //stuff
    }
}

 

Yep I'm aware of this already (I had updated the OP with this bug a few hours ago). I'm working on a fix, which is actually pretty difficult because there's a lot of back-end API missing for it. 

Edit: It effects RS2Object as well, not sure if that bug is more prevalent because stacks aren't common.

[Aiban]

Gj @Alek and shout out to @Chris

[progamerz]

6 hours ago, Alek said:

Yep I'm aware of this already (I had updated the OP with this bug a few hours ago). I'm working on a fix, which is actually pretty difficult because there's a lot of back-end API missing for it. 

Edit: It effects RS2Object as well, not sure if that bug is more prevalent because stacks aren't common.

Umm i don't think so it effects RS2Objects cause i am using them and working much better than before, can i ask how it does effect RS2Objects?

[Alek]

1 hour ago, progamerz said:

Umm i don't think so it effects RS2Objects cause i am using them and working much better than before, can i ask how it does effect RS2Objects?

It's for selecting stacks of objects in a menu. For instance if you have two guards to "Attack" in one menu. It shouldn't be working for stacked RS2Objects.

[progamerz]

24 minutes ago, Alek said:

It's for selecting stacks of objects in a menu. For instance if you have two guards to "Attack" in one menu. It shouldn't be working for stacked RS2Objects.

Oh ok thanks for explaining

[Alek]

New version 2.4.123 released, let me know how that works for you guys.

[Chris]

15 minutes ago, Alek said:

New version 2.4.123 released, let me know how that works for you guys.

is the jar supposed to say .123 or just stay as .122?

I'll test the jar i downlaoded though

[Alek]

7 minutes ago, Chris said:

is the jar supposed to say .123 or just stay as .122?

I'll test the jar i downlaoded though

Jar is supposed to say .123

 

Edit: UGH! Forum software.... I updated the link.

[Tom]

55 minutes ago, Alek said:

Jar is supposed to say .123

 

Edit: UGH! Forum software.... I updated the link.

Darn forum software!