Jump to content

Solution

Ex-Staff
  • Posts

    3866
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    5
  • Feedback

    100%

Everything posted by Solution

  1. Runescape server's have been globally shit for the past couple of days. Nobody is 'getting away' with anything. Eli couldn't complete the firecape because of this, now he's offering you the cape for free and you're saying you don't want to take the risk? Why did you order the cape in the first place then? But sure, if you don't want a free cape that's not my problem. Feedback removed and dispute closed. You will have to give TLS_ELI his stuff back though, and TLS_ELI will have to refund the payment if that happened.
  2. I don't see why he'd risk getting banned, especially considering that the same risk was taken by you in the first place?
  3. Is this an acceptable deal for you? That would be a way to settle this 'dispute' nicely.
  4. Are you the original owner of the account? You followed most of the format but you forgot that part.
  5. User has been banned. Sorry for you loss.
  6. At this point is practically impossible to determine who did what on the account. @vojtaS could've done it to try and screw devry or his workers over @koboldNinja could've done it when he was doing the quest @skill a pure could've dropped it after getting it for whatever reason. Considering we have no idea what has happened, and it's practically impossible for us to determine, I will leave it up to Devry and voitaS to come to an agreement.
  7. So which members exactly had access to the account in question? I've also asked @skill a pure to reply here, hopefully he can post a larger screenshot in which he actually achieved the torso to match usernames with a screenshot provides.
  8. I'll give him 24 hours from this post to reply here before he gets banned.
  9. Tree fiddy for u boye On a more serious note, I'd say 30m is a decent price.
  10. It's probably because you can only bump every few hours.
  11. I'll give the user a 24 hr deadline to reply here before he's banned,
  12. It's not, it's being worked on.
  13. if anybody of us knew we wouldn't share it as it would be a major bug in the game.
  14. Says the guy that has qouted ~20 posts without saying anything? stop spamming to get 100 pc.
  15. Evidence to support those claims would be helpful. I'd appriciate 's input in this before taking any action, considering you are willing to pay him back. Maybe you two can work something out.
  16. I'll let user decide about the account part, though I do indeed highly doubt that he'd want the account back. How much time would you need to gather 150m to refund pak a yak? To add to that, since Harry claimed to be OO, he will be held accountable for what happened. Combining the confession of Harry, and logic's provided proof, I will remove 's TWC as there's no reason for that now. I will await what @Harry has to say about the situation and see if something can be worked out with .
  17. Dispute closed, user wont be allowed back. That being said, I see no need to sling false accusations 's way.
×
×
  • Create New...