Put forum as private so you need to register to view forum contents

[ANIMA VESTRA]

Don't like how someone can just view through the entire forum without ever having the need to create an account. Also google displays all forum info easily if you search it.

[Harry]

Yeah true.

[Yooooooooo]

Yeh yeh word up son you know how it is ye ye ye this the way it suppose to be word up.

[Lemons]

Lol, why change this. If anything it brings in more users because google can index/search content. If you don't want something read, don't post it online.

 

Also, google search > IPB search.

[Maldesto]

Give me a valid reason? Who cares if people can browse, I usually won't register at a forum I can't browse before registration.

[Yooooooooo]

Give me a valid reason? Who cares if people can browse, I usually won't register at a forum I can't browse before registration.

Yeh fosho homie i feel ya shit man yoyoyoyoyooyoyoyooyoyoy wtffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffff

[Stacking]

Give me a valid reason? Who cares if people can browse, I usually won't register at a forum I can't browse before registration.

 

has spoken.

[Sky]

Also google displays all forum info easily if you search it.

Good

[Chris]

Yeh fosho homie i feel ya shit man yoyoyoyoyooyoyoyooyoyoy wtffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffff

 

what are you saying man.

[ANIMA VESTRA]

Give me a valid reason? Who cares if people can browse, I usually won't register at a forum I can't browse before registration.

 

How about this instead: when people go to browse the forum without an account, they can see the topic sections, but are unable to view the posts unless they log in.

[Maldesto]

How about this instead: when people go to browse the forum without an account, they can see the topic sections, but are unable to view the posts unless they log in.

why?

[ANIMA VESTRA]

why?

 

Don't like how someone can just view through the entire forum without ever having the need to create an account. 

 

That's pretty much it, no other reason.

[Rsgoldtime]

Yeah lets kill the market on osbot lol.

 

How much traffic do you think osbot generates from guests viewing its market and banners etc?

 

 

I can tell you no gold site owner on this site would like any part of this suggestion :l.

 

No support.

[ANIMA VESTRA]

Yeah lets kill the market on osbot lol.

 

How much traffic do you think osbot generates from guests viewing its market and banners etc?

 

 

I can tell you no gold site owner on this site would like any part of this suggestion :l.

 

No support.

 

OSBot is like the 4th top viewed botting site and it's an already established site that's been here for a while. I don't think it'll kill the market in terms of traffic. And if it did based on weekly/monthly traffic reports, we could always reverse the decision.

[Gorilla Sensei]

I don't really see the point, it makes offsite scam reports harder to work with, it is a malicious way at gaining members and it really isn't an effective safeguard of your privacy - anything that you post here is done so with the knowledge that anyone on the internet can see it, LIKE EVERYTHING ELSE ON THE INTERNET.

 

Thinking that osbot is a private and secluded community is just stupid