Chuckle Posted June 11, 2015 Share Posted June 11, 2015 There has been many reasons in the past, But this one has to take the podium "Guilty until proven innocent" what the fuckhaha Some guy got head while he was BLACKED OUT/ PASSED OUT and got expelled from uni for sexual assult...Post found here:http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/man-receives-sex-act-while-blacked-out-gets-accused-of-sexual-assault/article/2565978 Acts like this from a country built on "liberty and justice" quote from the pledge of allegiance... http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pledge_of_Allegiance HA rant over. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fruity Posted June 11, 2015 Share Posted June 11, 2015 UK for the win. We just need more sun Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chuckle Posted June 11, 2015 Author Share Posted June 11, 2015 UK for the win. We just need more sun very sunny today.. i had lunch in my garden Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Uchiha Sasuke Posted June 11, 2015 Share Posted June 11, 2015 Most of America's criminal justice system holds the defendent as, "Innocent until proven guility." Not the other way around. I don't really know about Amherst but I find that very strange. In this case, it seems like the girl is the rapist and not the man since he was unconious and could not consent to having sex in any way. Hopefully he is able to get due process. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fruity Posted June 11, 2015 Share Posted June 11, 2015 (edited) very sunny today.. i had lunch in my garden Im stuck at my desk :'( Edited June 11, 2015 by Fruity Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Master Chief Posted June 11, 2015 Share Posted June 11, 2015 Cool opinion Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NoahTheWeebWolf Posted June 11, 2015 Share Posted June 11, 2015 Amherst is a college... A private one at that(meaning that because they don't receive public funding, they don't have to abide by the same exact rules as public institutions do.I really fail to see what this has to do with the Country as a whole. A private institution makes their own rules, and the student agreed to abide by them upon attending.Not saying what happened to him is fair but still this has hardly anything to do with the legal system as a whole and more to do with the faulty policies of a college. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Apaec Posted June 11, 2015 Share Posted June 11, 2015 The death penalty is wrong Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Muffins Posted June 11, 2015 Share Posted June 11, 2015 The death penalty is wrong I disagree, but that discussion is for another day. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fantabulous Posted June 11, 2015 Share Posted June 11, 2015 Thats one of the worst reasons to hate 'murica 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SneakyJew Posted June 11, 2015 Share Posted June 11, 2015 lol Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Trustmybet Posted June 11, 2015 Share Posted June 11, 2015 Can we all just chill and relax ): Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RServiceGeeks Posted June 11, 2015 Share Posted June 11, 2015 (edited) Well even if it was a public university they handle cases within the school, colleges are being equipped to handle anything that happens on there premises. The overall outcome depends on what the school board passes down. Usually they expel the student and apply the charges to his or her permanent record so it would be hard for them to get approved for another university, but if the charges are heinous I'm sure if goes to a different system. Usually it goes like this, any organization receiving public funding they usually have to abide by federal minimum standard and the law of the land, if an organization is privately funded they can usually manipulate their way out of certain situations, but don't get me wrong they are not allowed to run over the law. Usually private universities keep all their situations private to preserve the way the school is perceived. No one wants to send there child to a school that has reports of teachers touching students for instance! Edited June 11, 2015 by RServiceGeeks Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Improvz Posted June 11, 2015 Share Posted June 11, 2015 lol the police brutality is worse yo. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SupremeLeader Posted June 11, 2015 Share Posted June 11, 2015 I do agree with the irony of the "innocent until proven guilty" in the United States lol. In my opinion a better example is Albert Woodfox. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
