Darren Posted July 16, 2017 Share Posted July 16, 2017 (edited) www.realistgold.com next time Edited July 16, 2017 by Darren 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Spectre Posted July 16, 2017 Author Share Posted July 16, 2017 1 minute ago, gearing said: he was not sane to trade 180m to a random-.- you could have done nothing, DONT TRADE RANDOMS WITHOUT MIDDLEMAN If he had TWC written under his name, Im sure the dude wouldn't have traded him. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Turkoize Posted July 16, 2017 Share Posted July 16, 2017 another weeb bites the dust. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gearing Posted July 16, 2017 Share Posted July 16, 2017 (edited) 5 minutes ago, Isildur1 said: If he had TWC written under his name, Im sure the dude wouldn't have traded him. people are oblivious of the fact that this is the internet, where people can scam without serious consequences, the botting forum makes them feel it is safe to trade to randoms, well, daily remainder it is NOT 3 minutes ago, Turkoize said: another weeb bites the dust. Հեռացնել քյաբաբը Edited July 16, 2017 by gearing 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Charlotte Posted July 16, 2017 Share Posted July 16, 2017 Simply put, if someone decides not use a MM, there's nothing wrong albeit being a little sketchy. But the deal is off. Not worthy of TWC. Perhaps a new pip like "Refused Middleman" should be used instead.... 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Spectre Posted July 16, 2017 Author Share Posted July 16, 2017 Just now, Charlotte said: Simply put, if someone decides not use a MM, there's nothing wrong albeit being a little sketchy. But the deal is off. Not worthy of TWC. Perhaps a new pip like "Refused Middleman" should be used instead.... It usually shouldn't be worthy of TWC, but everyone who saw the evidence knew that it was an obvious attempt to scam! That's my point. I know there are people who will refuse, but from the skype chats and the way he responded, it was so obvious he was trying to scam. Not just cause he refused to use an MM. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Charlotte Posted July 16, 2017 Share Posted July 16, 2017 2 minutes ago, Isildur1 said: It usually shouldn't be worthy of TWC, but everyone who saw the evidence knew that it was an obvious attempt to scam! That's my point. I know there are people who will refuse, but from the skype chats and the way he responded, it was so obvious he was trying to scam. Not just cause he refused to use an MM. Logically, it looks like a scam. However, that's on the surface. Not taking sides, but you as a seller could suggest using a mod as a MM but I think you didn't. He might have reasons not to use MM. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Spectre Posted July 16, 2017 Author Share Posted July 16, 2017 3 minutes ago, Charlotte said: Logically, it looks like a scam. However, that's on the surface. Not taking sides, but you as a seller could suggest using a mod as a MM but I think you didn't. He might have reasons not to use MM. I did suggest using a mod Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Charlotte Posted July 16, 2017 Share Posted July 16, 2017 3 minutes ago, Isildur1 said: I did suggest using a mod Well, I didn't see any information which supports that. Hence the assumption. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aroyo Posted July 16, 2017 Share Posted July 16, 2017 holy fuk he refused a middleman, obvious scammer lmfao what are the mods doing -.- Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Darren Posted July 16, 2017 Share Posted July 16, 2017 8 minutes ago, Aroyo said: holy fuk he refused a middleman, obvious scammer lmfao what are the mods doing -.- Well he did scam someone for 180m, so if the shoe fits then the assumptions were correct Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Decode Posted July 16, 2017 Share Posted July 16, 2017 13 minutes ago, Charlotte said: Well, I didn't see any information which supports that. Hence the assumption. I charge 5-10% on middleman trades. @Saiyan has less feedback than @DrDu does even with him being a mod. Two very good reasons as to why he might've refused. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
k9thebeast Posted July 16, 2017 Share Posted July 16, 2017 How about we hold mods responsible for not protecting the community? I feel if this were a rule they would care a little more about it. I mean for gods sake no one even searched Jamez's skype before making him CBA. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rekt Posted July 16, 2017 Share Posted July 16, 2017 11 minutes ago, Aroyo said: holy fuk he refused a middleman, obvious scammer lmfao what are the mods doing -.- says the one joined 3 days ago Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Decode Posted July 16, 2017 Share Posted July 16, 2017 1 minute ago, k9thebeast said: How about we hold mods responsible for not protecting the community? I feel if this were a rule they would care a little more about it. I mean for gods sake no one even searched Jamez's skype before making him CBA. You think me refunding 80% of what he scammed is not taking responsibility? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
