Jump to content

Preventing RS Botting Bans V3


Recommended Posts

  • 4 weeks later...
  • 4 weeks later...
Posted

I'm new to botting decided to try out afking castle wars I've let it run over night plenty of times and I'm at over 1k tickets now.

I guess detecting afk bots in castle wars is harder than normal gold/skill bots? What I usually do is use the bot to keep me logged in in case I forget to click once every 5 minutes but I do click and type stuff myself occasionally, I also do all of my skilling myself and did all f2p quests aside from the new one. Tried it on a new level 3 for shits n giggles and it got permabanned after just a couple of hours(I did have it on defend mode instead of afk which might have given it away).

Something else I've wondered about is if they can tell which client you're running, maybe playing legit on the osbot client helps throw them off too?

Posted
On 12/10/2017 at 12:11 PM, Blutch said:

then how do you explain Cballs and Magic tree bots, they are litteraly online 10 hours a day and ive seen lvl 3 s with +150m wc xp and +15m smith, how do these accounts slip through the system?

There are Venesuela gold farmers, they slip through the system as they are not bots :)

Posted
On 12/10/2017 at 5:11 AM, Blutch said:

then how do you explain Cballs and Magic tree bots, they are litteraly online 10 hours a day and ive seen lvl 3 s with +150m wc xp and +15m smith, how do these accounts slip through the system?

You didn't read a word in my original post - don't post in here until you have. 

Posted
7 minutes ago, Zapako said:

@Alek Obviously its all speculation and there are many variables to consider, but do you believe default osbot interactions (such as the banking api, or interacting with an npc etc) is a factor for ban rates?

Are you saying that other bots on other clients dont get banned because they are not using the OSBot API? Are you implying that scripts that don't use "default" interactions have better "ban rates"? Proof by contradiction?

Posted
26 minutes ago, Alek said:

Are you saying that other bots on other clients dont get banned because they are not using the OSBot API? Are you implying that scripts that don't use "default" interactions have better "ban rates"? Proof by contradiction?

Obviously every bot has there own interactions (this is was not meant to come across as an attack on osbot),  what I am saying is that Jagex most likely de-obfuscates each bot which allows them to figure out the general characteristics that any bot may have when doing certain interactions. Anyways what I am getting it is, do you believe is worth while for scripters to put effort in coding custom interactions with the intention of a reduced ban rate?

Posted
On 1/24/2018 at 10:27 AM, jamal004 said:

10 hours a week :o

 

Challenge accepted.

Challange Completed. @Aleks advice actually comes a long way with the way botting is nowadays.

Back in the day  I remember being able to bot for hours on end, and suicide was always writing yourself a death note to Jagex.

This being said, I botted on my alt for 1-2 Hours a day while switching off to playing legit and doing my own things by hand for an hour or so..and its still alive and from my past experiences this account will stay alive as long as I keep the momentum of my gameplay and doing various activitys than sitting at a Magic Tree for 12+ hours a day back in 2012. 

Which now is really low amount of botting time but if you want to be safe, these are the sacrifices you have to make. To me, I see botting as gambling and like 90% of people who bot want to test their limits and get the most amount of XP in a single session to see how far they can go. Well guess what boys, times have changed and jagex will hit you with the permaban faster than you can blink. When you wake up in the morning and your hearts beating to login to that account I promise you, you will be banned or are on the list awaiting to be banned by a mod. 

With all jokes aside and fires I set off in peoples eyes, remember "bot smart, not hard" my friends :)

 

  • Like 2

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...