Lewis Posted April 17, 2017 Share Posted April 17, 2017 1 hour ago, RoomScape said: Did I say everyone besides me? i don't get how i'm being a hypocrite. you say it shouldnt be done, yet you get feedbacks like it. That is hypocritical Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RoomScape Posted April 17, 2017 Author Share Posted April 17, 2017 4 hours ago, Lewis said: you say it shouldnt be done, yet you get feedbacks like it. That is hypocritical I deserve to be banned. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ez11 Posted April 24, 2017 Share Posted April 24, 2017 Just wondering if mods discussed this idea or if it would be a good idea to change feedbacks/rules regared MMing since one user (who also posted in this topic and was against a rulechange) that was notorious for spamadvertising his MM service at every opportunity now got banned and scammed a lot of money by recovering accs/taking gp he was MMing or from accs he had access to. Its obvious that the inflated FB from that user made him seem more trustworthy. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RoomScape Posted April 24, 2017 Author Share Posted April 24, 2017 1 hour ago, ez11 said: Just wondering if mods discussed this idea or if it would be a good idea to change feedbacks/rules regared MMing since one user (who also posted in this topic and was against a rulechange) that was notorious for spamadvertising his MM service at every opportunity now got banned and scammed a lot of money by recovering accs/taking gp he was MMing or from accs he had access to. Its obvious that the inflated FB from that user made him seem more trustworthy. I try to make quality suggestions but I guess it's being ignored. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Decode Posted April 24, 2017 Share Posted April 24, 2017 This is actually a good suggestion IMO. MM's are underrated and taken for granted, while as you pointed out, should be amongst the most trusted on the site. Will see if i can discuss this amongst the staff team. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Administrator Maldesto Posted April 24, 2017 Administrator Share Posted April 24, 2017 I'm down for a change, lets see what the staff can come up with. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tesla Posted April 24, 2017 Share Posted April 24, 2017 4 minutes ago, Maldesto said: I'm down for a change, lets see what the staff can come up with. lets do it!@!@!@!@!@!@!@! change is good Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gearing Posted April 24, 2017 Share Posted April 24, 2017 8 minutes ago, Tesla said: lets do it!@!@!@!@!@!@!@! change is good only when it is in my favour;) ( i dont have a single MMing feedback ) 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RoomScape Posted April 27, 2017 Author Share Posted April 27, 2017 On 4/24/2017 at 4:16 PM, Decode said: This is actually a good suggestion IMO. MM's are underrated and taken for granted, while as you pointed out, should be amongst the most trusted on the site. Will see if i can discuss this amongst the staff team. Since my third point was addressed to a certain degree - though it's kind of unclear how one goes about being verified - what about the first and second point? Will anything change with those? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Decode Posted April 27, 2017 Share Posted April 27, 2017 4 hours ago, RoomScape said: Since my third point was addressed to a certain degree - though it's kind of unclear how one goes about being verified - what about the first and second point? Will anything change with those? To give feedback as a middleman is against the rules and if you do see it, make a false feedback dispute sonwe can take care of it. Same regarding your first point, people posting they can MM is considered spam. Report the post and we'll deal with it. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
