Nike

or for people who shouldn't be banned.......... cough cough @Nike

Gl I wanna try out this script, can you use mirro client with it?

Fully support the twc thing because mine would just say for nothing

I feel like some people just disappear. It would be nice to now what they did to get banned. Just my thoughts.

idk i messaged varc saying he had like 4 different skypes ..

ill bid 5m if no reg email

FREE ME LET ME GO HOME :

20$

it has no associated email therefore dramatically reduces the chance of it getting recovered

id buy if it has no reg email

Im February of 2014

How can I be chain banned if i never botted??

They were banned the next workday. So if I sold you an account that I had been botting all day and everything was fine when I sold it to you, but it was banned in the morning because that is when the majority of accounts get banned that I wouldn't have to refund you? Same thing if I botted tutorial island and sold you a fresh account and the next morning it was banned before I had even logged in. What use would I have in lying?

On skype I had bought 2 accounts from the user before with no issues

I NEED THE CHAT BOX BEEN DEPRIVED FOR 2 WEEKS

http://osbot.org/forum/user/24006-gearing/?tab=feedback I bought 2 accounts from Gearing on May 4th around 5pm Est. Logged in for first time since buying today to find that they where both banned on May 5th. My guess is that he botted the accounts that day and they where chained banned the next day. If any Mod wants to team viewer me to show more evidence would gladly. Also I just bot Vip on the 7th and had never botted before so its not my Ip. Above is proof of his skype listed on his osbot profile. First account login First accounted banned Second account banned I would like a full refund of the 14m I paid for the accounts

dam

yeah i bought vip today and it was 9.99 ...

wait my vip was 9.99?

YEAH TY

PLEASE CHANGE to Nike Bought vip just to change my name...

why was my post deleted? ex-staff getting roasted to much ....

If a service owner can't take the time to insurance the safety of their customers then they should be an owner The only thing this could apply to would be accounts, which I highly doubt you would refund an account with the exact same stats, Basically what you said is if the manager of a company tells a worker to go into an unsafe working condition, and the worker dies, that his mistake would be covered by insurance? No insurance company covers stupidity. Close thread \

The purpose of the initial deposit of service workers is "suppose" to be insurance. 2nd its a service owners fault if they leave more than what that deposit was on the account. It gives worker temptation to take. You as a service owner should never leave more than your willing to refund no matter how much you trust your worker. If worker made 10m deposit over a month ago and has done a fair amount of jobs, but then logs onto an account to see that there is 100m on the account. That is 10x his initial deposit and probably more than he made in that whole month. Tbh its service owners responsibility to keep its customers safe. If they don't take full responsibility or run it like a proper business should be run, then they probably shouldn't be a service owner. Having insurance would only cause more scams I believe as owners would hire less trusted users to do services as they now have a safety net, in future causing more scams and costing you a ton of money,. In end its good concept in theory, although completely avoidable. It would never work