NotoriousPP

7

Support! I liked the ease of access to each category be honest.

I feel bad because of all the bad karma going his way.

One of my favorite parts: "If we are going to move towards more realistic estimates, we need to do a better job of anticipating the problems with our projects, and also need to be able to communicate up and down the food chain when the first hint of delay or feature creep hits." I think this is especially true in this situation.

They were allowed to use the script the entire time, this was just a joke blown completely out of portion. All they had to do was message @Swizzbeat or myself to have them removed in less than a few minutes. Though it went almost polar opposite of what I expected, and has even now gotten to the point of almost being controlled of what I write/post, because one person on that list took it to heart and its trying their best to ruin my time on this forum. Not very professional; but it doesn't effect me, just makes the company look bad if you ask me.

The ban-list was already removed as well, and has already been pushed to my Repo. So now it's up to the Admins to re-add it to the market. I would message them saying it has been updated, and that they shouldn't punish the users of the script.

I support this idea! Being that this client directly deals with Java, I think it could prove very helpful for other writers that need help; instead of bouncing from one person to another trying to get a correct answer, they would be able to find a writer that knows what they are talking about, and will most likely get the correct answer quicker. Though if this does get approved I feel that it should be limited and have strict requirements, to keep the rank somewhat prestigious. It should not become a rank that is thrown to anyone that asks, though only to people who took the time to learn a programming language fluently. If someone has taken the time to actually learn Java(Any programming language for that matter) fluently, and has not just skipped ahead to working with a API, should be recognized in my opinion; it's a lot of work. I'm not saying I should get this rank, because personally I don't even think I'm even close to deserving this rank, I'm just saying it's a pretty good idea!

Restarted Project!!! Updated OP with new information!

Spam belongs in a can. Like...

Yea or you'll end up like me.... Walking around Karmjara jungle lost for like two fucking hours, for no apparent reason...

But....

More like a broken nose.

Mmmm canned meat....

First thing that came to my mind.

Add me on skype, I may be able to help you out, just check my scripts to see how I made mine. notoriouspp

Start learning Histograms for image comparison. It's a interesting subject, and is do-able with Java.

Because technically you did gain that much XP; you went from having 0 to 238,585 XP upon logging in. :p

I got lucky and bought a few when they were $10 each a year or so ago, and then sold them for x6 for what I bought them for a year later, best investment ever.

I agree with the post above; this post in not about you @Alek, so don't get defensive. I honestly just suggested there should be a guideline to follow instead of trying to blindly apply. I have no clue why there SHOULDN"T be, so why try to argue about it?

That actually would be a great idea! And using empty files would most likely be fine, being as it's not a scripting example, more or less a structure example.

I believe I got it now. But on topic, I'm not saying the way it's package it is the problem, I just feel there needs to be some type of guideline posted before you even post your script. So you don't have to sit in anticipation just to find out it's packaged wrong when you had no warning prior. The only instructions I got are Fisher > src (with NO OTHER FILES/FOLDERS) > java files Which can be taken in different ways, which is the reason I feel having a guideline would help clarify and even help out the script approval process.

I did... Now I need to add my src folder into a module, I understand I needs to be a certain way, but to repeaditly point out a single problem and when I fix one, suddenly something else is wrong, is a major waste of time for both of us...

Denied again.... Improper packging, we need a guide....

Oh having the src folder should be obvious to anyone that scripts. But I like organization in my projects, especially my fishing project having 30+ different files, so I like to sub folder things, for example: -src -core -files -walking -files -jobs -walking -files -dropping -files -files -utils -files But even though there in the source folder, the first two denies were because I had folders inside src, and not this: -src -file -file -file -file -file -file etc... The required script structure seems so sloppy and unorganized, and I feel as most people who are familiar with scripting, especially with people going to school scripting(At least my teachers make me), would not package src>file unless you were writing a "Hello World!" application. But would mostly likely create a system of folders/subfolders for their project.

So this wouldn't have usually bothered me, but having my last 4 uploads request shot down because of incorrect packaging. Yet there is NOTHING stating anything about packaging. I believe there should be at least something on the request page to inform people, so they don't sit day after day waiting for their script to be uploaded, just to find out you messed up because of something you had no warning for beforehand. Which I think if your going to repeatedly deny a script because of this reason, there should be at least note, or a warning on the upload guide. Because the packaging that is required is not a packaging I would in a project outside of OSBot, (OSBot: src>javafiles; My other projects: src>org>etc>subfolders>javafiles). My suggestion is to make a note/warning on the upload request page, maybe even a guide on packaging and not just setting up Git, OR have @Alek be a little more helpful when it comes to this subject, because all I get from him is the same response, "You packaged it incorrectly.", and although I ask questions, they are all responded with "You packaged it incorrectly.". Just my suggestion to help new scriptwriters get their scripts uploaded or reviewed sooner, and not immediately denied because of something that is not stated anywhere.