RoomScape

I will once I train my F2P stats.

Ok how about we blacklist some worlds, then?

Please calm down. I'm trying to level mining and I have to fight against your scripts. It's not necessarily hard but I just can't AFK train since you guys have your bots. Please chill a bit and let me train in peace. I'll go P2P after I level some stats a bit. Thanks. PS: I'm probably killing this one guy's mining xp/hr as I'm not letting him get any iron ore. rip

One thing that I find really stupid and confusing is when people trade five mind runes and a bucket of milk for 100m. If you just trade the 100m and that's that, it could be because you owed people money. You could give it to someone you know. irl friend wants to help you start in the game, etc. There are a bunch of reasons. When you put something else in the trade window, though, it's now representing that you're trading 100m for those 5 mind runes and bucket of milk. Who tf would pay 100m for five mind runes and a bucket of milk? There has to be something up with this trade, let me look at it... ----- Obviously, if you're trading 100m 50x a day every day of the week, then that's a different issue that gold sites have to deal with. If you're trading and both accounts are on the same IP, that's another account as it's very rare and can be self trading/gold farm mule. But other than that, you shouldn't have an issue unless you make an issue trying to be stealthy. With a lot of things in life, I see people messing up because they're trying too hard whether it be in other games, they try too hard to do something and end up messing up; in life when they try too hard to get the girl or the job, you just look really desperate and people don't like desperate because desperate people do stupid shit. I just go with the flow and play cool and haven't had any issues at all and very few issues in life so it works and i'll just keep doing that.

Forgot to reply to this yesterday. Ive never been banned in 8+ years of doing this for any reason. I’ve used my main, Ive used fresh level threes, I’ve used everything and never got banned. Traded botters, gold sites, etc. I think people just put too much thought into it. I just play the game and trade people when I have a deal going on.

Buying 20m need asap

Ahh, I see.

I’m trying here man.

Too late.

Forgot I need it for that quest but damn man it's taking a while.

Bump.

Chinning is a lot faster. Cannon is cheaper per gp but slower overall.

You don't play? Looks awesome. Why not? Yeah, it looks amazing. I'm not home at the moment but hope I can get home before the game mode goes away.

Out of the country and am feeling bad. I haven’t played recently but I want to hop on and rock that Thanos. Anyone played with it and having fun?

You’re not supposed to edit the OP.

Lmfao I was actually surprised that this wasn’t in Market > Other until I saw your post. ??

I'm hoping that you're smart enough to have it in a company (LLC may be best) and so Jagex would not be able to pursue you for more than you have - as far as I know. I remember a few times they were threatened to shut down before Jagex filed any lawsuits. Another time Jagex had them shut down because the site had the term 'RS' in it which Jagex claimed copyright. But legally, I don't see anything wrong with selling gold in an online game. If you breach their (Jagex) specific terms of service, then they have the right to ban you - they have the right to ban you regardless, but yeah. I can't see how you can successfully get sued by Jagex for a monetary amount for selling gold in their games unless it's breaking one of the UK laws (or laws of where your store is operating). I'm not a lawyer so you should probably go get a lawyer to talk to you about your options and be better informed opposed to taking random advice from a random guy on an online random site.

Depends on damages, court fees, lawyer fees. But most importantly, what the court approves - should they win. And you can get sued for any reason at any time. The only difference is whether or not you'll win the lawsuit.

lol'd Made me laugh. This picture is amazing.

I just read that quote you added into the OP. I get what you’re trying to do but doubt it’ll help ultimately. There are complete idiots in the marketplace - for a lack of a better word - and will get scammed regardless or what you do, say or implement to try and keep them safe. Some people like getting scammed while others just have money to blow since they’re either really bored, really rich or a combination of the two and really stupid. If this is offensive to some people then good - hopefully this will actually help you since obviously nothing that has been done has. There will always be scammers and there will always be people looking to be scammed, whether they realize it or not. Although I'm always for helping people and trying to prevent scams, I just think that awareness is a lot better than requirements as requirements will always find a new way to be bypassed. It’s really hard to search anything without the search bar, but I’ve seen a number of people claim to have had an account recovered by a user with under 100 post count after that rule was implemented. Whether they knew about the 100 post count requirement is irrelevant to the fact that they either went first or bought an account from a no name user with under 100 posts on this forum. There’s just nothing you can do about that and everything you try to do will be thrwarted by those same people you try helping because they’re just stupid. I honestly don’t have any other explanation for why this happens. So while this isn’t necessarily a horrible idea, I’m not sure how helpful it’ll actually be. It may just be more work as users will spam even more vigorously trying to get that 100 post count for yet another part of the forum to be unlocked or they’ll start posting their price checks in other categories of this forum.

I never thought you were trying to get rid of it but I just don't think that adding a 100pc requirement just like account sales would be beneficial in this party, but who knows. Next there's going to be a requirement to sell gold, then to buy, then everything else. I'm not opposed to adding requirements in to certain sections, I just don't see the point in it. Price check is a estimate and has nothing to do with the rest of the forum. What's next, if someone wants a price check on an account but doesn't have the 100 posts, would they be able to ask someone to post a price check for them and both parties get infracted for that?

They should just be infracted as if they were trying to sell an account - I think it's a temp ban? I don't know. I think an account value shouldn't be based on the OP when making a price check as it has nothing to do with how much the account is worth. When you actually go to sell the account then that has something to do with the value since trusted/not trusted makes a difference. But a price check is just an estimate of value.. Just like when you get your car valued. It's valued on mileage, year, make and model for the most part. When you actually go to sell it, though, they start looking at all the little intricate flaws of the car since it's then being for sale.

Right, but if you're posting that the account is worthless - that is obvious spam. That was my counter suggestion. The OP stated that there should be a 100 post count in order to post price checks I believe.

There are rules against spam. That’s considered spam and that should be an infraction.

No, it's spam just like the person saying it's worthless and they should be treated just like the person saying it's worthless - unless, of course, they actually want to buy the account for 100m...then that's a totally different, probably mental issue. Also, just because it's your opinion doesn't mean you have to state it, you know what I mean? I see a lot of stuff that I have opinions about in the market but don't post it because it's not the place. If it's spam or has something to do with the topic or if I'm questioned then I'll post. But just posting your opinions everywhere is pretty pointless, waste of your time (along with the person reading it) and just completely unwanted in most situations.