Tom

3056

i bet u had so much fun!

2154

^ Dicked by the doctor feat. Johnny Sins

right

3471

3454

3451

3440

You fall into the 93% group

3438

2136

2234

Nvm i didn't see it

You are never actually executing bank.open(); Also, the sleeps in the USE case aren't needed anymore, remove them. Also reduce the sleep time in the walk to bank

You need check if they can animate, so if(canAnimate()){ use bucket on tap etc }

I was hoping to see some beautiful blonde hair! Right!!?!

All of the text should have a disable options because I don't need no Mirror client shit popping up over my paints

Because you are sleeping for 7 or so seconds, and after that 7 seconds of sleeping, it will try to interact again unless you add some conditions. What I would suggest is called an animation timer, ill post the snippet. long lastAnimation = 0; public void updateTimes() { if (inventory.isItemSelected()) { inventory.deselectItem(); } if (myPlayer().isAnimating()) { lastAnimation = System.currentTimeMillis(); } } public boolean canAnimate() { return System.currentTimeMillis() > (lastAnimation + 2000); } Then you want to have another Case state being animate, preferably the first state so it gets checked first which just checks if the player is animating, and runs updateTimes() if he is. if(myPlayer().isAnimating() && !myPlayer().isMoving()){ updateTimes(); } Also, you should add a break; at the end of your Case:TAKE state.

When you say you added the beta walking class, what are its limitations at the moment, is it the actual web walker?

It was just one of the first things I noticed that could potentially cause problems, I myself didn't know bank.open used a conditional sleep, I thought it was just the interaction then continues.

Because you aren't checking if the bank is actually open yet. You're just telling it to open the bank, then it will immediately execute the code after that. Put a condition sleep in after bank.open() new ConditionalSleep(5000){ @Override public boolean condition() { return bank.isOpen(); } }.sleep

yes detective

Isn't it bad to have static variables? Like static getters and stuff I understand, but static variables just sounds like a bad idea