Leaderboard

Disappointed that is temp

We are currently doing research to the matter. We will get back to the community with an announcement soon.

The only way I'd support this is if the user comes back, they are allowed to get their username back. (This could be stated in the email sent to the user once their name gets changed)

We should be allowed to take names on the forums that a certain "INACTIVE" Member has if we request to. Like say theres a member called "Swag" Who hasnt logged into his account since.. May 2013.. We should have the chance to atleast request his name.. Whats the point of letting a user that hasn't logged in since fuck knows when keep a name he doesn't deserve? Lets get them supports and change that stuped ruel the time period for requests should always be for users that are inactive 4 months+ Support List: @Fuzzyy @Cinnamon @Ricky @Mikasa @ball @Santa Claus @Violent @Ghetto @Britney @Umbrella @EpicPins @Swizzbeat @Someluser @lolmanden

I will support this, but only under certain circumstances. In addition to the user being 4+ months inactive, that user should have 10 or less posts if someone wants to take that name. If that user does come back to the forums and does request his previous original name back, he should have it given back to him.

That's really nice of you to help out a child with such an undeveloped brain. I can see how he was struggling to access the section.

*Registration Deadline 12/8/13*

I've never really been good with Photoshop. But I wanted to make my own paint for a script I'm working on, how does this look?

he told me he got well over 1.7b

Probably from trolling in the chat, don't care anyways. Graphic section was dead -Fp-

why did you lose graphic designer

what time today? Once Alek gets online, if he gets online

Support.

I like the idea but theoretically couldn't someone come back after 3.5 months (on the 4+ month limit) and post one thing and repeat the process just to keep a name? What I'm trying to say is just because someone comes online and maybe posts something, it doesn't make them active. It is hard to measure level of activity, and hard to deduce what level of activity someone should retain to deserve to keep their name.

well if we could get this done then i think we have enough supports to process it

im in.

if trhey had the option to get their name back if they ever did return.. then its fine

People like you are a cancer. You really think someone who created account and never came on forums is going to come back? Pretty sure it's just someones multiple account so they can use the free scripts on a bunch of accounts not just 1 client ... lol Edit: @Violent approves this suggestion. There are plenty of sites I've registered on but don't logon, but occasionaly after a month or two I do just to check on it. I'd be pretty upset it someone took my name. And there's no category for 'cancer'ous people.

Jason you wanna be as nice as your dog thinks u are ... thats a catch!

You want the reason? Because it's alienware That is the only reason you need.

Looks Good.

Looks pretty good.

This looks a bit pixilated but other than that it looks great.

This is an informative thread. This was not made to bash Osbot nor @Alek Okay, so as most of you know @Alek is the new admin, even though his title says 'Script Manager' he is really an admin. Proof: http://osbot.org/forum/index.php?app=forums&module=extras&section=stats&do=leaders I went to go look for a script when I saw one of his. Why not use it? I opened the script up when I found that in order to use some advanced settings you must donate.... basically you are paying for it. So when I first saw it I didn't really care, until I realized.... this is kind of like paying for a script. The free version is basically like a Lite mode while the 'donated' version is a paid one. I wouldn't care, but @Alek is not only an admin but a SDN scripter. Shouldn't he know better? Shouldn't someone be alarmed that our script manager is doing this? Just a thought to leave in your head Please don't delete this. This is an informative thread. This was not made to bash Osbot nor @Alek