www.realistgold.com next time 

Edited July 16, 20178 yr by Darren

1 minute ago, gearing said:

he was not sane to trade 180m to a random-.- you could have done nothing, DONT TRADE RANDOMS WITHOUT MIDDLEMAN

If he had TWC written under his name, Im sure the dude wouldn't have traded him.

another weeb bites the dust.

5 minutes ago, Isildur1 said:

If he had TWC written under his name, Im sure the dude wouldn't have traded him.

people are oblivious of the fact that this is the internet, where people can scam without serious consequences, the botting forum makes them feel it is safe to trade to randoms, well, daily remainder it is NOT

3 minutes ago, Turkoize said:

another weeb bites the dust.

Հեռացնել քյաբաբը

Edited July 16, 20178 yr by gearing

Simply put, if someone decides not use a MM, there's nothing wrong albeit being a little sketchy. But the deal is off.

Not worthy of TWC. Perhaps a new pip like "Refused Middleman" should be used instead....

Just now, Charlotte said:

Simply put, if someone decides not use a MM, there's nothing wrong albeit being a little sketchy. But the deal is off.

Not worthy of TWC. Perhaps a new pip like "Refused Middleman" should be used instead....

It usually shouldn't be worthy of TWC, but everyone who saw the evidence knew that it was an obvious attempt to scam! That's my point. I know there are people who will refuse, but from the skype chats and the way he responded, it was so obvious he was trying to scam. Not just cause he refused to use an MM.

2 minutes ago, Isildur1 said:

It usually shouldn't be worthy of TWC, but everyone who saw the evidence knew that it was an obvious attempt to scam! That's my point. I know there are people who will refuse, but from the skype chats and the way he responded, it was so obvious he was trying to scam. Not just cause he refused to use an MM.

Logically, it looks like a scam. However, that's on the surface. Not taking sides, but you as a seller could suggest using a mod as a MM but I think you didn't.

He might have reasons not to use MM. 

3 minutes ago, Charlotte said:

Logically, it looks like a scam. However, that's on the surface. Not taking sides, but you as a seller could suggest using a mod as a MM but I think you didn't.

He might have reasons not to use MM. 

I did suggest using a mod

3 minutes ago, Isildur1 said:

I did suggest using a mod

Well, I didn't see any information which supports that. Hence the assumption.

holy fuk he refused a middleman, obvious scammer lmfao what are the mods doing -.- 

8 minutes ago, Aroyo said:

holy fuk he refused a middleman, obvious scammer lmfao what are the mods doing -.- 

Well he did scam someone for 180m, so if the shoe fits then the assumptions were correct 

13 minutes ago, Charlotte said:

Well, I didn't see any information which supports that. Hence the assumption.

I charge 5-10% on middleman trades. 

 

@Saiyan has less feedback than @DrDu does even with him being a mod. 

 

Two very good reasons as to why he might've refused. 

How about we hold mods responsible for not protecting the community? I feel if this were a rule they would care a little more about it.

I mean for gods sake no one even searched Jamez's skype before making him CBA.

11 minutes ago, Aroyo said:

holy fuk he refused a middleman, obvious scammer lmfao what are the mods doing -.- 

says the one joined 3 days ago 

1 minute ago, k9thebeast said:

How about we hold mods responsible for not protecting the community? I feel if this were a rule they would care a little more about it.

I mean for gods sake no one even searched Jamez's skype before making him CBA.

You think me refunding 80% of what he scammed is not taking responsibility?