Zach

Hmm, I guess someone didn't push his fixes for that. Doesn't matter, I fixed it and I'm uploading it as 1.7.78. Edit: Uploaded.

Worked fine for me. Such as?

I don't work on OSBot 2 beyond helping when asked. So I have no idea what the progress on that is.

Some fixes with this version. v1.7.77 Withdraw-X should now select the option if it already exists (or enter in a value if it doesn't). Prevented a few infinite loops associated with logout. Character.isUnderAttack() modified so that it now checks for a valid attacker (using isFacing() and HP > 0). I don't know if this is going to cause some problems with bosses, so if it does, please let me know. v1.7.78 setRunning() fixed. v1.7.79 Slight tweaks to walking. Some minor changes to internal threading (working on the crash bug, I haven't been able to replicate it since with 2 hours of testing, so provide feedback on this).

We're doing our best to make sure these fixes won't delay the OSBot 2 release. But either way, it's quite near!

What admins were involved in that thread? I can't seem to find any.

Well, that has nothing to do with this so meh ;\

Arg, maintaining two different systems is a pain. Now??? I just tested a few so it should work ;\.

Maldesto has the same permissions on ACP as I do. For non-ACP stuff, it's more programming oriented or secured by multiple layers, so I usually have to get involved at that point.

Not going to happen. There are enough idiots trying to get ranks and it just wastes time. Besides, we generally already know who is good and deserves it. And pretty much everyone that applies would be underqualified so there isn't really a point.

Sorry, but I must ban you now.

The move to the new system basically only transferred auths that were given by Maldesto, Alek, or myself. I believe a new tool is going to be released that will be in compliance with the new system, but I have no ETA on that at the moment. If you purchased it, you're fine.

It could in theory happen, but without a security manager in place, the chances of it happening are about zero.

So after you retire, are you going to be a texas ranger?

There is nothing to push, so I assume Alek took care of it.

The entire idea of an updater relies on patterns. How else are you going to do it? Manually? Even doing it manually relies on patterns. Your brain recognizes specific patterns of loops and such and puts it together to form a bigger pattern. In short, every single strategy that's been used in an updater is going to rely on patterns. Using a reflection explorer is perfectly acceptable, but keep in mind that it's still limited in capability compared to direct refactoring. It's a good starting point nonetheless.

v1.7.64 only contains a hotfix for people having trouble loading up the game. If you're not having problems, there is no need to update.

That's interesting, I suspect it's a side effect of PayPal now blocking eChecks that are going to OSBot's paypal (like 25% of eChecks were actually legit, so it does make sense). That came into effect some time in the past week, so it's highly possible. I'll have to look into this though.

What about 1 script purchase = 1 concurrently running bot? So, if you purchase it 2 times, you can run it on 2 accounts at the same time. Not saying I agree with it, but it works for those of you that are trying to achieve lower prices for normal users and higher prices for goldfarmers.

Windows 8.1, OSX 10.9, Ubuntu 13.10, Ubuntu 12.04, CentOS 6.5, Kali (in no particular order).

You can pretty much copy and paste an updater these days. It used to be that having an updater meant something because of the effort/knowledge involved. With multiple open-sourced ones, it's become much easier to just guess a pattern until it works. And that's the reason most of them are unstable.

How dumb can you guys be? That code is used to prevent scripts from running getPassword() method (i.e. prevent local scripts from stealing your password). Learn to reverse engineer. I'll even post the code here.

Would it be a good idea to have an example repository set up? I'm just tossing around ideas at the moment since doing that would require at least some code (unless we just use blank files).

You can have folders inside of your src folder for packaging. If you use an API library, you can store those in your "dependencies" folder (more details were mentioned in one of the threads). If you need more information, just let me know.

Did not expect 2 of those people... You and Maxi don't have auto push??? I assume you guys would even though you don't have scripts. I don't think Maxi really deals with pushing scripts. But, I think not having an SDN script implies that we can't auto-push [our own scripts]. But you're entirely correct that both of us do have access to push scripts. You're probably clean because the code seemed to specifically target Windows machines. The scripts were disabled as soon as we became aware of the possibility. So, the bot will never show you those scripts. You can check the Client Area in the forum to see, but it should still be there provided it hasn't expired or something.