Botre

New black name wat? WAAAAAAAAAAAAT MGIMGI,MGI,MGI,MGI,MGI,MGI,MGI,MGI,MGI,MGI,MGI,MGI,MGI,MGI,MGI,MGI,MGI,MGI,MGI,MGI,MGI,MGI,MGI,MGI,MGI,MGI,MGI,MGI,MGI,MGI,MGI,MGI,MGI,MGI,MGI,MGI,MGI,MGI,MGI,MGI,MGI,MGI,MGI,MGI,MGI,MGI,MGI,MGI,MGI,MGI,MGI,MGI,MGI,MGI,MGI,MGI,MGI,MGI,MGI,MGI,MGI,MGI,MGI,MGI,MGI,MGI,MGI,MGI,MGIMGIMGI,MGI,MGI,MGI,MGI,MGI,MGI,MGI,MGI,MGI,MGI,MGI,MGI,MGI,MGI,MGI,MGI,MGI,MGI,MGI,MGI,MGI,MGI,MGI,MGI,MGI,MGI,MGI,MGI,MGI,MGI,MGI,MGI,MGI,MGI,MGI,MGI,MGI,MGI,MGI,MGI,MGI,MGI,MGI,MGI,MGI,MGI,MGI,MGI,MGI,MGI,MGI,MGI,MGI,MGI,MGI,MGI,MGI,MGI,MGI,MGI,MGI,MGI,MGI,MGI,MGI,MGI,MGI,MGI,MGIMGI,MGI,MGI,MGI,MGI,MGI,MGI,MGI,MGI,MGI,MGI,MGI,MGI,MGI,MGI,MGI,MGI,MGI,MGI,MGI,MGI,MGI,MGI,MGI,MGI,MGI,MGI,MGI,MGI,MGI,MGI,MGI,MGI,MGI,MGI,MGI,MGI,MGI,MGI,MGI,MGI,MGI

The facts that this is the first ban offence on the account in question in 8 years (look at the pictures) and that it occurred during (or closely after) an outsourced service solicited via a botting forum don't play int the provider's advantage. The provider hasn't given any proof other than some very weak arguments. If the provider fails to bring in some actual proof I think the receiver should be compensated for his loss and be refunded.

The service provider was also responsible for not botting. The ban in question here is proof that there was botting activity on the account, it's up to both parties to try and prove when and under which circumstances the ban occurred. If the service provider didn't respect the no-macro part of the deal, which was a term of the service, then the receiving user is eligible for a full refund because he payed for a manual service not a botted one. And some additional money to make up for the ban on top of that. This dispute got on my nerves, I found the arguments from the service provider extremely weak and the lack of evidence from both parties didn't help much either.

wuuut

I can agree with that, just not with the nice 'n fresh part Just messin' with ya timie.

Dude. Get some Belgian beer, seriously... Dutch beer tastes like piss in comparison.

Drink some water man, no need to get into drinking alcohol just because you are 21.

:')

Honeycomb W8.1/Cyan iOS8 Nothing new here

win

I agree that it's overpriced. What annoyed me is that people were laughing at the price because of the i3 even though i7 processors are only like 100-150$ more expensive :p

Lol @people bashing i3 http://www.intel.com/content/www/us/en/processors/processor-numbers.html http://www.intel.com/content/www/us/en/processors/core/core-i3-processor.html

11. Feedbacks False feedback for the Trader Feedback System is not allowed. Feedback is also meant to be unique. This means that a single user can not give the same user multiple feedback in an unjust way to abuse the system. An example of this is buying/selling back to the same person over and over or trading in small increments and counting them as separate feedback. This can result in a full feedback reset or a ban. It is allowed to receive feedback for a service, as long as the service was either paid or there was risk involved. An example for risk is doing a firecape service for someone, on an account that contains more than 1M RS3 GP or 07 GP. As we are aimed particularly at the RuneScape market, you are only allowed to give or receive feedback for graphics if there is at least $1 worth of goods (based off of common transfer rates) transacted. Feedback for free product will not be allowed. For further clarification on this rule, read here http://osbot.org/forum/topic/47264-feedback-rule-change/ If you use a middleman you may give him feedback but the middleman himself is not allowed to give feedback.

I'm pretty sure that most scriptwriters make less than 150$/month from OSBot nowadays. Would take hell of a lot of months to get rich with an income like that ;)

There's no age on intelligence, luck, entrepreneurship, dedication or creativity. And you don't even need all of the above to "succeed". Work on your own success instead of looking down on that of others.

The game was released in 2009. So that's about 17 million sales in 5 years. An average of 3.4 million sales per year since its release = an average of about 9.3 thousand sales per day. Look at the number of copies sold in the last 24 hours, still above the daily average. So cut the bs :p Also, operation costs are extremely low, its player base is loyal to say the least and its target audience very wide. But it might still take up to 20 years to make back their investment from game sales. But that's not what this deal is about. The privilege of having their logo on the splash screen of a game that's played by millions of kids, teenagers and young adults on a daily basis is why they bought the game in the first place. Like I said before, get them while you are young. It's a brilliant move.

Minecraft is the new Lego, it's a strategic purchase: get them while they're young.

Continents man

Have a good one!

Rsbdd did it didn't they ^^ Not impossible.

They shouldn't

No (t yet?)

The planet doesn't care, there are no feelings to hurt, no health to maintain, there's no need to save it.

3.. 2.. Bank If script shares were a thing I would have made this baby my cash cow bitch Me gusta