RSlayer [AIO]

[Salty as fuck]

Maybe use ID's instead of item names?

Id's can change depending on updates while names don't.

[crico]

Looks good!

[Extreme Scripts]

Really good attempt for a first script! My suggestions would be to clean up your code a lil cos you could simplify a lot of things e.g. When checking for a Glory in your bank you can just use: 

getBank().getItems().stream().filter(item -> item != null && item.getName().contains("Amulet of glory")).collect(Collectors.toList());

That will return all the glories in your bank. Great start though

Edited February 21, 2016 by Extreme Scripts

[ProPheT1x]

Looks swell.

[Salty as fuck]

Really good attempt for a first script! My suggestions would be to clean up your code a lil cos you could simplify a lot of things e.g. When checking for a Glory in your bank you can just use: 

getBank().getItems().stream().filter(item -> item != null && item.getName().contains("Amulet of glory")).collect(Collectors.toList());

That will return all the glories in your bank. Great start though

Literally a life saver

Writing everything out was so annoying.

 

Thanks :3

[Explv]

Really good attempt for a first script! My suggestions would be to clean up your code a lil cos you could simplify a lot of things e.g. When checking for a Glory in your bank you can just use: 

getBank().getItems().stream().filter(item -> item != null && item.getName().contains("Amulet of glory")).collect(Collectors.toList());

That will return all the glories in your bank. Great start though

Arrays.stream(getBank().getItems()).filter(item -> item.getName().contains("Amulet of glory")).collect(Collectors.toList());

FTFY.

 

getBank().getItems() returns an Item[]

Edited February 21, 2016 by Explv

[Botre]

Arrays.stream(getBank().getItems()).filter(item -> item.getName().contains("Amulet of glory")).collect(Collectors.toList());

FTFY.

 

getBank().getItems() returns an Item[]

 

Optional<Item> glory = Arrays.stream(getBank().getItems()).filter(i -> i.getName().startsWith("Amulet of glory")).findFirst();

FTFY.

[Explv]

Optional<Item> glory = Arrays.stream(getBank().getItems()).filter(i -> i.getName().startsWith("Amulet of glory")).findFirst();

FTFY.

 

Item glory = getBank().getItem(item -> item.getName().startsWith("Amulet of glory"));

FTFY.

Edited February 21, 2016 by Explv

[Botre]

Item glory = getBank().getItem(item -> item.getName().startsWith("Amulet of glory"));

FTFY.

 

 

Nope.

Mine is still faster, less expensive and safer.

 

Thank you for playing, please try again!

Edited February 21, 2016 by Botre

[Explv]

Nope.

Mine is still faster, less expensive and safer.

 

Thank you for playing, please try again!

 

Your opinion.

 

You should learn what premature optimisation is.

 

My solution is better.

 

Thank you for playing, please try again!

Edited February 22, 2016 by Explv

[Botre]

Your opinion.

 

You should learn what premature optimisation is.

 

My solution is better.

 

Thank you for playing, please try again!

 

Premature optimization is only an anti-pattern if the cost of the optimization outweighs the benefit.

Me picking the best solution over the worse solution in this case and at this point doesn't cost me anything extra because....

 

... I already know the best solution and can implement it as fast if not faster than the lesser solution.

 

Since the optimization didn't cost me anything, the cost can't outweigh the benefit and this is there not a case of antipattern premature optimization but efficient optimization tout-court.

 

*tokens only, push to reject*

 

I'm just playing lel, let's stop this cockfight.

Edited February 22, 2016 by Botre

[lisabe96]

for (Item item : script.getInventory().getItems()) {
  if (item != null && item.getName().startsWith("Amulet of glory")) {
    return item;
  }
}

I win for readable oldschool code

Edited February 22, 2016 by lisabe96

[Flamezzz]

I would still prefer the most readable solution of all:
 

bank.getItem(new ContainsNameFilter<>("Amulet of glory"));

It reads nicely like a sentence and is equal in performance when rounded to nanoseconds.


@OP  Nice script 

Edited February 22, 2016 by Flamezzz

[Explv]

I would still prefer the most readable solution of all:

 

bank.getItem(new ContainsNameFilter<>("Amulet of glory"));

It reads nicely like a sentence and is equal in performance when rounded to nanoseconds.

@OP  Nice script 

 

But didn't you know you should maximise performance, and minimise readability

 

 

 

 

 

Edited February 22, 2016 by Explv

[Kemdawg]

Using the string ("Amulet of glory") will also give you uncharged glory's so wouldn't it be safer to just use ("Amulet of glory (") to at least make sure that there's at least a single charge left in the glory? Not sure if the script doesn't need uncharged glorys but my assumption was that they're used for teleporting.