Nebraska Posted April 21, 2015 Share Posted April 21, 2015 (edited) Edited April 21, 2015 by Nebraska Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Twin Posted April 21, 2015 Share Posted April 21, 2015 I always figured it can detect patterns, and that's how bans happen, but then again that's a lot of tracking. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sky Posted April 21, 2015 Share Posted April 21, 2015 Well that had to of been fairly obvious. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zebrafon Posted April 21, 2015 Share Posted April 21, 2015 That's known information and Mod Weath just confirmed it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VladBots Posted April 22, 2015 Share Posted April 22, 2015 This is old news. He's been confirming this for at least a year. Welcome to the group that stalks his Twitter though. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nebraska Posted April 22, 2015 Author Share Posted April 22, 2015 This is old news. He's been confirming this for at least a year. Welcome to the group that stalks his Twitter though. I have been stalking this fool forever. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Epsilon Posted April 22, 2015 Share Posted April 22, 2015 ye, always good for him to confirm this though. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kittens Posted April 22, 2015 Share Posted April 22, 2015 thats pretty obvious lol. I feel like the bots that the system doesnt catch and ban hell go around personally and ban them himself and record any data to help ban future bots with system detection Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RoomScape Posted April 22, 2015 Share Posted April 22, 2015 That's known information and Mod Weath just confirmed it. How can you confirm something that's known? If he confirmed it, then it wasn't known, just speculated. If it was known, he couldn't really have confirmed it, rather he only repeated it. 5 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zebrafon Posted April 22, 2015 Share Posted April 22, 2015 How can you confirm something that's known? If he confirmed it, then it wasn't known, just speculated. If it was known, he couldn't really have confirmed it, rather he only repeated it. We're not talking about speculation here. It's about obvious information. That was my point. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RoomScape Posted April 22, 2015 Share Posted April 22, 2015 We're not talking about speculation here. It's about obvious information. That was my point. Then I'm not sure why you added that last part. The first would've sufficed by itself. ye, always good for him to confirm this though. You noob, how did you not know this? Noob is noob. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
idntbot Posted April 22, 2015 Share Posted April 22, 2015 Glad to know that an actual Mod confirmed this. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
