Just lost 40+ Feedback because of The mods. AMA

[Occazn]

Committing suicide. l83r

Edited June 23, 2013 by Occazn

[Catastrophe]

Why is it Maldesto's fault xd

[Fringie]

can i have ur bank?

[Jordan]

quit with me

 

 

 

[Speakmore]

We already know.

Jason has been complaining all day.

I stated in one of his threads to make a poll about changing the rules so that you could possibly gain the 40 back. He has yet to do that.

[Lee]

@Jason @Occazn I'll quit with yall. 

[Speakmore]

Why is it Maldesto's fault xd

They think it's his fault technically because he removed the feedback, while followig Kati's guidelines.

Like if the manager tells the worker to do something and he does it. If people don't like it, they'll blame said person. Maldesto removed the feedback, while doing his job correctly, they're unhappy with it

@Jason @Occazn I'll quit with yall.

Lmao

[Jordan]

COMMUNISTS!

[Occazn]

They think it's his fault technically because he removed the feedback, while followig Kati's guidelines.

Like if the manager tells the worker to do something and he does it. If people don't like it, they'll blame said person. Maldesto removed the feedback, while doing his job correctly, they're unhappy with it

is that y people blame obama 2

 

Someone talk me out of suicide

[Lee]

COMMUNISTS!

COMMUNIST

[Peter]

They think it's his fault technically because he removed the feedback, while followig Kati's guidelines.

Like if the manager tells the worker to do something and he does it. If people don't like it, they'll blame said person. Maldesto removed the feedback, while doing his job correctly, they're unhappy with it

Lmao

Actually no, because they all had the feedbacks before Kati added the rules, that's basically saying you can do something before they create a law and get punished for doing that something that's against the new law.

[Maldesto]

Actually no, because they all had the feedbacks before Kati added the rules, that's basically saying you can do something before they create a law and get punished for doing that something that's against the new law.

WE removed it so it would be a fair playing field. It is no fair that occazn jason and all the others have 40 + feedback multiple from each other, while new members can't. How is that fair to anyone? IF some new guy comes and gets 50 unique feedback while occazn has like 80+ half are multipled. Why should he be trusted more when in reality he has only been trusted by 40 people while the other guy has been trusted by 50... Especially when half jason and occazn feedback have no actual price, or service listed it was just

 

"good guy thx"

 

"sweet deal" 

 

"paid 200k for a sig"

 

That is one reason it was done. 

[Jordan]

WE removed it so it would be a fair playing field. It is no fair that occazn jason and all the others have 40 + feedback multiple from each other, while new members can't. How is that fair to anyone? IF some new guy comes and gets 50 unique feedback while occazn has like 80+ half are multipled. Why should he be trusted more when in reality he has only been trusted by 40 people while the other guy has been trusted by 50... Especially when half jason and occazn feedback have no actual price, or service listed it was just

 

"good guy thx"

 

"sweet deal" 

 

"paid 200k for a sig"

 

That is one reason it was done. 

 

lol

 

Comment=/= Detailed explanation.

Edited June 23, 2013 by Jason

[BotRS123]

This is not going to end well if so many good members leave. I wonder what is in store for OSB's future.

[Occazn]

WE removed it so it would be a fair playing field. It is no fair that occazn jason and all the others have 40 + feedback multiple from each other, while new members can't. How is that fair to anyone? IF some new guy comes and gets 50 unique feedback while occazn has like 80+ half are multipled. Why should he be trusted more when in reality he has only been trusted by 40 people while the other guy has been trusted by 50... Especially when half jason and occazn feedback have no actual price, or service listed it was just

 

"good guy thx"

 

"sweet deal" 

 

"paid 200k for a sig"

 

That is one reason it was done. 

 

Wait. You think that we got feedbacks that weren't deserved? You're assuming things so that's one of the reasons why you removed half of my feedbacks? 

wat

You didn't even ask me to provide proof of the feedbacks. You just said to yourself "o look dis gai sed *good deal*. it must be fake cuz im maldesto and im smart irl"

Plz.

Guess i'm leaving osbot until something is done about a specific global moderator. Time to post in the farewell section.

WE removed it so it would be a fair playing field. It is no fair that occazn jason and all the others have 40 + feedback multiple from each other, while new members can't. How is that fair to anyone? IF some new guy comes and gets 50 unique feedback while occazn has like 80+ half are multipled. Why should he be trusted more when in reality he has only been trusted by 40 people while the other guy has been trusted by 50... Especially when half jason and occazn feedback have no actual price, or service listed it was just

 

"good guy thx"

 

"sweet deal" 

 

"paid 200k for a sig"

 

That is one reason it was done. 

 

Hey Maldesto, even though you aren't a global moderator anymore, I'd still like you to take a look at this.

 

 

Just got a feedback for somebody saying that. Does that mean it's fake? No. A lot of the people on these forums are rather new and don't actually comprehend what to write on the comment. I can give you ALL the evidence you need for the transaction going through, how much was sent, the paypal balance, everything. Just because somebody doesn't say what it's for, doesn't mean it's fake.