Which one is better for training at 50 attack? Currently getting 42k exp a hour with granite hammer in nmz at 81 str just wondering if granite longsword is good for training or if it’s better than a hammer for training!

cheers 

Edited December 25, 20178 yr by RichardH95

I do granite hammer, as the granite longsword has a slightly slower attack speed.

Though the granite sword has slightly better stats then the hammer, its lower attack speed makes it worse for training as it will output less dps

They gave granite Warhammer the same attack speed as a scimitar, making it BIS for 50 attack pures. All other warhammers have a lower attack speed and yes, granite longsword is inferior for training. 

Warhammer is better

Warhammer is more dps 

hammer

28 minutes ago, ozeki6 said:

Warhammer is more dps 

Deffo hammer, like everyone else has said

Cheers guys I suppose 42k a hour isnt to bad at 81 str! ?

What about a Leaf-bladed sword? I thought thats best for 50 atk....i mean it does have 55 slayer req. But on my old pure i was getting about 42kish an hour training at ammonite crabs with it using super combat pots

been said a bunch already, but hammer has more dps.

all day on hammer. 

Tbh if you go to Google rs wiki - type in stats to granite hammer vs granite sword itll give you what you're looking for. Hammer has same attack speed plus better bonuses and str bonus = hammer wins 

Hammer. All the bots at sand crabs use it, they can't all be wrong. Flawless logic 

Bummer, I've always used the granite longsword lol.