Dispute on Muffins

[Muffins]

 

 

After offering to further work on it to match his needs (even though it's impossible to test which calc is actually accurate, its all speculation on both parties)

[TWC]

You aren't able to make it, it's that simple so no point in letting you work further on it. Regarding the speculation thing. I'll happily supply any mod with 300m+ on an acc and let them stake with your calculator which is supposingly accurate. Whatever they win goes to you. Whatever they lose you have to pay. So the question is here how much are you willin to lose? You are getting a 30m  why is all this bullshit needed.

[Decode]

@Muffins seeing as you can't oblige with the customers requirements in a timely manner, we've decided you will not work on the script anymore and just refund him 30m. You have 24 hours to do so. 

[Muffins]

I can make the auto-accepter just fine actually, the staking calc part is all speculation as there is no true way to detect or tell which one is accurate. You are comparing mine vs another (which you did indeed test before, regardless of the test amount). 

 

It being delivered in a timely matter has to do with him not wanting me to work on the other part. I can be reached on skype as I will be in the office all day and most likely not on OSB.

 

As for what he said on the account with 300m sure you can do that, but in the end, it's all RNG so whether they won or lost it would be negligible due to how staking actually works.

 

to further justify my case, please refer to this image (keep hidden) as well as this sentence, he doesn't even know what percentages he wants things calced at so him saying mine is off because his other calc got a different percentage is just fucking stupid.

 

[hidden]

[Dex]

What is the big deal here? You haven't started on it so just refund him the 30m?

[Muffins]

57 minutes ago, Dex said:

What is the big deal here? You haven't started on it so just refund him the 30m?

why should i start on it if he wanted to cancel the order after i asked if i should start on it (at an earlier date) and he said no?

Edited June 5, 2017 by Muffins

[Dex]

3 minutes ago, Muffins said:

why should i start on it if he wanted to cancel the order after i asked if i should start on it (at an earlier date) and he said no?

The fact is, you haven't started on it yet. So how hard is it to refund him for the work you HAVEN'T done yet.

Stop arguing and start refunding.

[Muffins]

1 hour ago, Dex said:

The fact is, you haven't started on it yet. So how hard is it to refund him for the work you HAVEN'T done yet.

Stop arguing and start refunding.

because he asked me NOT TO START ON IT? I can do it while im at work but I can't deliver what he wants because "my staking calculations are off" which is what he wanted. I can do the auto accepter and show stats, but showing the x (part of what he wanted) is impossible to do due to him not liking the way I did my calculations. That is what my issue is.

[Dex]

33 minutes ago, Muffins said:

because he asked me NOT TO START ON IT? I can do it while im at work but I can't deliver what he wants because "my staking calculations are off" which is what he wanted. I can do the auto accepter and show stats, but showing the x (part of what he wanted) is impossible to do due to him not liking the way I did my calculations. That is what my issue is.

Yes, I understand that. But it seems only fair to me that you get paid for the work you provided, meaning a refund of 30m is in order.

[Muffins]

4 hours ago, Dex said:

Yes, I understand that. But it seems only fair to me that you get paid for the work you provided, meaning a refund of 30m is in order.

What the OSBot staff will not do.

 

3. Test the script for functionality, or review any part of the code (Staking Calc)

 

-Not Clear: Agreed upon script feature is broken, but overall script works (which it would if he wouldn't have canceled the order)

 

In the case of this, the aforementioned script(s) fall under those two categories. I could really care less about 30m, I'm just making a fair case for myself.

[Decode]

17 minutes ago, Muffins said:

What the OSBot staff will not do.

 

3. Test the script for functionality, or review any part of the code (Staking Calc)

 

-Not Clear: Agreed upon script feature is broken, but overall script works (which it would if he wouldn't have canceled the order)

 

In the case of this, the aforementioned script(s) fall under those two categories. I could really care less about 30m, I'm just making a fair case for myself.

We have the right to intervene with private scripts now, also according to @Alek. 

Just refund the guy 30m. 24 hours to do so or get banned

[Muffins]

refunded

[TWC]

I have been refunded by muffins.