OP is straight and engaged.
And I can bet his woman walked by a b*tched him out for an ass being on his monitor.
And furthermore,
Pornography: printed or visual material containing the explicit description or display of sexual organs or activity
Straight off of google.
So your arguments are invalid, considering no sexual Organs or Activities[ex: sex] are being portrayed.
Good day, sirs.
Why good day to you sir, I will just go ahead and prove every one of your stubborn arguments wrong.
You don't know for a fact that he is straight, just because he is engaged; I should of clarified that earlier, I believe he is a closet homosexual.
A quick fix would be to just disable that signature that they do not wish to see.
Furthermore, it's apparent that the simple minded such as yourself cannot dig deeper into the context of a definition to discover the true meaning.
Based on your Google-ripped definition, it would be valid to argue that breasts (organs) that are clothed fully but still are somewhat displayed can be considered pornography.
Also, pornography can be interpreted differently by different people, so you cannot say that Google is the only 100% true and correct answer, because it obviously is not.
This answer that I have given should clear up all questions and concerns pertaining to this topic, this thread can now be closed.