ProjectPact

damn lol

But ask yourself... do you think Floyd would ever have the balls to step outside of his comfort zone and into the octagon?

Floyd said he would go to the octagon and kick his ass, but that will never happen. So no, I'm not trolling. You my friend have no clue what you are talking about. http://www.totalprosports.com/2017/07/11/mayweather-i-dont-care-if-its-in-the-ring-or-the-octagon-im-kicking-ass-video/ Now, back to my point. Conor went out of his comfort zone and fought someone who has never lost a match (49-0). Conor did not hit the ground once, which you're absolutely right about. What I thought was even more interesting was that near the end of the 9th round, Floyd and Conor were 1 point apart. How are you going to say he didn't do an amazing job? For someone who is new to a sport, coming straight into it fighting one of the greatest boxers of all time, that is remarkable. However, Conor's biggest problem was he wasn't keeping his hands up. Besides that, he didn't do as bad as you are trying to make it seem. He was making contact with his jabs which seemed to be effective in catching Floyd off-guard, and would occasionally make full contact with his hooks. Floyd also had a hard time defending himself because Conor was really good at counter attacking from different angles; an advantage his MMA skills gave him. So, if you want to continue to sit there on the band wagon and say that Conor did not put up a good fight, you are out of your damn mind.

Conor did amazing, I don't care what anyone says. Yes, Floyd won... but Conor put up one HELL of a fight. People were saying a second round knockout. Plus, Conor is the only one who had the balls to do something like this. But what you won't see is FLoyd going into the octagon.

1 sec let me find you something that might help a bit! [EDIT]:

I just think you don't know how to bot properly tbh if you have this many accounts being banned. Might want to read up on botting some.

And how many is that? I've never been banned and have used this for over a year. People are probably using other scripts as well with it.

Will look into! Thanks

Vilius's service don't use hotmail email addresses. @tranzystor3 Are you the OO of this account? Also, the thread in which the account was purchased, and said Vilius was the OO, was actually edited at a later time. The original thread did NOT say he was the OO.

+1 for funny video

@Vilius were you the original owner of this account?

look at my message above again.

Yea, I went through and banned 5 of his accounts. Thanks

You tagged me in it and then literally a few moments later, you opened a Dispute. And that isn't how a dispute works. Disputes are solved in the DISPUTE section, not in PM's. Here is some real evidence for you... both made literally an hour ago:

'Tis true. I told him not to waste my time making another dispute in an already over populated dispute section. Instead of pm'ing me letting me know one of his usernames was still on the evidence, he opened a report. I've got an idea! Maybe hide usernames and password in pictures where it isn't pertained in the dispute? Sorry was handling every dispute at the moment and overlooked a username. Also, it is very biased if I withhold ALL information from the person you are disputing. How will they be able to know what was said about them? How would they be able to defend themselves?

He said around 20hours at first, but then within the same message said that he did not want to give a time. YOU said 20 hours sounded good. As far as the time fame goes, was it 4 hours or was it 58 minutes. You both are giving me different time frames.

Feedback removed.

Confirmed. User was banned. "skype: mike.rere" Was posted on a thread he edited. Dumbass. Thanks for your help!

I've gone ahead and banned the user. If they ever wish to return, they will have to pay everyone they scammed. Sorry for your loss.

Multiple disputes are open with this user. Please DO NOT DO TRADES until this is sorted.

I need proof that someone was on the account prior please. A statement from @Sysm would be good enough, or a conversation between the two. If in fact this was the case, then I would be more than happy to remove the feedback.

Ok, myself, as well as other staff members, are having a hard time understanding what exactly took place. "I had planned on buying this account from @Carti after contacting him multiple times on skype." "I had bought this account from @coolkidson" So who's account was it to begin with. Give me a list like this: user1 sold it to -> user2 sold it to -> etc... -> I bought it from userX

The user is placed in TWC already, and has been asked to comment here. As far as being refunded, I need proof of bank prior to any items being taken off.

Seeing as he is already in TWC, I can't place him in there again, however I have asked him to reply here. He has 48 hours to do so or he will be banned. Also, I'm a bit confused why would you hire someone in TWC to do services?

I have placed the user in TWC and asked them to respond here. Is there anymore proof you can give me that it was actually him? Any pm's on OSBot? Also, what is his Skype address?