FushigiBot

@forumaccount you will be making scraps and he would still need to learn how to get past tutorial, initial bans, gold's worth, etc etc etc. Not worth it unless you live in a country where you earn like $20 a month. Yeah most do, and it's up to you to make sure you understand what those requirements are. Once you have something going on, then you have to learn how to mule, offload, etc. The learning curve can be steep for those who know the game, so I'd say to play the game a bit before jumping into botting.

It's extremely difficult to bot osrs it without knowing the game. How will you know what to bot? What goals to set? The requirements for what you want to bot? etc etc etc.

It shows only when launched with CLI. Nah, there probably is but it doesn't show on the top unless you launch it with CLI. At least that's how it works on my end. Edit: The most recent client version does display it regardless of CLI. You have to tick the proxy checkbox and then select the proxy.

Nice bump. It's usually in the script post. If it isn't, ask the dev.

OSBot will only work well with JRE8. Try this: 1. Remove all forms of java from your PC. 2. Download the offline installer from here and install it: https://www.java.com/en/download/manual.jsp

Almost all lmao.

Once the bot is back up.

Those webwalker updates got me like 🍆

Mirror is less detectable on paper but some time ago jagex has been able to detect mirror more than stealth even without botting. It seems to has to be with how/when the client hooks or the login iirc. The devs were looking at it last I heard.

This won't do anything to reduce bans. It's a flag system. In game location, client, ip, etc. are the main flags. If the script is fairly well made, the only thing that could potentially reduce bans is choosing uncommon bot locations.

It worked. Thanks! public void shouldPickUpTinderboxes() throws InterruptedException { List<GroundItem> allTinderboxes = getAllTinderboxes(); int emptyInventorySlots = inventory.getEmptySlots(); if (!boolShouldPickUpTinderboxes && !boolShouldSpeakToWiseOldMan && !boolShouldBank && stringMethodSelector.contains("tinderbox_picker") && areaDraynorVillageWiseOldManFrontOfTinderboxBookshelf.contains(myPlayer()) && !allTinderboxes.isEmpty() && allTinderboxes.size() >= emptyInventorySlots) { boolShouldPickUpTinderboxes = true; log("Attempting to pick tinderboxes."); } if (boolShouldPickUpTinderboxes) { if (boolShouldSpeakToWiseOldMan || boolShouldBank || !stringMethodSelector.contains("tinderbox_picker") || !areaDraynorVillageWiseOldMan.contains(myPlayer()) || allTinderboxes.isEmpty() || getInventory().isFull()) { boolShouldPickUpTinderboxes = false; log("Tinderboxes picked."); } } } public List<GroundItem> getAllTinderboxes() { return getGroundItems() .getAll() .stream() .filter(g -> g.getName().equals("Tinderbox") && areaDraynorVillageWiseOldManFrontOfTinderboxBookshelf.contains(g.getPosition()) && getMap().canReach(g)) .collect(Collectors.toList()); }

Yikes, thanks. Will try that now.

Can't seem to get this working correctly. The value (groundTinderbox) always seems to come back as 1 no matter how many ground items there are as long as it isn't 0. I'm almost certain it could be because it isn't a stackable item, but not sure. Here is the snippet: public void shouldPickUpTinderboxes() throws InterruptedException { GroundItem groundTinderbox = groundItems.closest(areaDraynorVillageWiseOldManFrontOfTinderboxBookshelf, "Tinderbox"); int emptyInventorySlots = inventory.getEmptySlots(); if (!boolShouldPickUpTinderboxes && !boolShouldSpeakToWiseOldMan && !boolShouldBank && stringMethodSelector.contains("tinderbox_picker") && areaDraynorVillageWiseOldManFrontOfTinderboxBookshelf.contains(myPlayer()) && groundTinderbox != null && groundTinderbox.getAmount() >= emptyInventorySlots) { boolShouldPickUpTinderboxes = true; log("Attempting to pick tinderboxes."); } if (boolShouldPickUpTinderboxes) { if (boolShouldSpeakToWiseOldMan || boolShouldBank || !stringMethodSelector.contains("tinderbox_picker") || !areaDraynorVillageWiseOldMan.contains(myPlayer()) || groundTinderbox.getAmount() == 0 || getInventory().isFull()) { boolShouldPickUpTinderboxes = false; log("Tinderboxes picked."); } } }

I'm not sure but I will keep an eye on this. I have noticed that my bots do hop to 301 or 302, but I haven't been paying attention enough recently to see if they are stuck in a world hop loop. One thing is that once they hop to these worlds, they often can't log back in from break because the "world is too busy". Might as well make a suggestion to remove them both from the random hopper interactions, as they often cause problems due to being at capacity as well.

Love seeing "web walker links" in upates.

I have 6 day proggies with barely any breaks, so breaks and looking like a "human" is a least important flag, if important at all. Bans highly depend on which and how many flags you trigger, and whether the in game location is being "watched" at the moment. We are at higher than usual banrates atm as well. Good luck botting and never bot on an account you care about.

Human breaks and bedtime doesn't do much to curve bans. I can run accs without breaks for days without a ban. It's one of the least important flags. Flag priority usually changes but client is usually at the top. We are currently at high banrates for new accs accross all clients so just watch out for that.

Bans started again with more frequency about 2 weeks ago but bots went on for months with minimal bans.

There have been minimal bans accross all botting platforms, which caused an overflow of gp.

@Zackaery

This means I can get rid of the deselect item methods on my scripts. ;D

1. OSBot Version 2.6.71 2. hopToF2PWorld() has an issue where, if it hops to world 301, the next time it tries to hops to another random f2p world, it will try to select w301 again and get stuck in a loop. If I hop worlds manually, the next time it tries to hop worlds through the api interaction, it will choose w301. I don't know if this happens with hopToP2PWorld() 3. No. 4. Not sure. It happens once the API selects w301 once. 5. Not sure.

Welcome. The learning curve is steep but don't give up.

Lovely. The beta world hop was driving me crazy.

It won't be easily detected. Jagex detection system uses flags and mouse is just not very important. However, mouse recording for rc is not practical as it is likely to get lost easly.