RoomScape

I'm not that ignorant as to fall for that. I fell for a PM trap once about a year or two ago and I've learned from that one mistake. People tell me to PM screenies or chat logs and I refuse. They call me a scammer and delete my Skype, but I don't care. It's not that hard to prevent a PM trap or turn it against the impostor, but it's too easy to fall for it and people just don't care/get lazy. Also, whenever I MM, I make a group chat with both users requesting them to post their Skype in the PM. That prevents any impostors and gives me a record of their Skype.

If I'm buying something and I get tricked into a 'PM trap', I should be responsible since I'm the one who fell for it and it directly caused someone to get scammed. If an impostor just has a similar Skype and scams, that's the sellers fault. If the impostor gets the buyer to PM and tricks them, it should be the buyers fault - whoever got tricked into the PM trap - since they weren't careful enough. It's also the sellers fault, but still mainly the buyers (or whoever is the trusted seller making the other person go first). Too many instances of this going on and impostors are getting away with it - if it's even an impostor.

Basically. The people have spoken!

If mods were active in the chatbox, I'd be all for it. However, they aren't as active as @Nezz and I. I see @Arctic and @Catastrophe in there, and occasionally @Nick, but the others don't come in as often. They just deal with the forums. If we both lose our rank, there'll be a gap and people will be causing mayhem in there.

I take offense to that.

Poor Mikasa didn't get anything from mine either.

That would've been gold. So is your mom, but I didn't care.

Not this particularly - even though I'm sure I've seen one or two threads like this stating fb should be shown or removed - but generally, this sort of stuff happened before, lol. People want it, it gets approved. Later people don't want it so it's removed, then people want it again.

Ooh. Interdasting.

LOOOOOOOOL http://www.break.com/video/girl-fight-ends-with-shovel-throw-2605815?fb_action_ids=667737049946384&fb_action_types=og.likes

Such troll Many lies Much fake Wow

Considering this gets approved, someone will make another post down the road requesting that feedback is shown throughout the forums rather than just the market section.... These back and forth decisions need to stop. Make one decision and stick with it. (Towards both staff and the community).

Ahh, I get it. Yeah, that could be good. I don't know how many people would be for it, though.

But if you have a tag, you can search all other threads with that tag easily. Not as simple to do with just brackets.

It would be a lot more appropriate if there were actual 'verified' tags that only staff could add. You never know, someone could try to sneak a verified in their title. :|

They shouldn't pin them.

You have reputation - I have 500 something meaning 500 people have liked a multitude of posts/threads I've created. Isn't that similar?

We have something similar - The 'like' button as well as profile rating. The 'time out' can be used against members people don't particularly like, not factoring whether their post was actually useful or not. I don't think that part should be implemented.

If they have a regular thread and a verified thread, one thread would be completely pointless to have - in this case, the verified thread.

Example: If you have a thread in verified, you shouldn't be allowed to have one in the regular section. I suggest we either make a verified tag (so that there won't be a separate section and it'll be easier for consumers to notice all the threads - they tend to ignore verified or just miss it completely sometimes). But regardless, this shouldn't be allowed. This is essentially the same thing as me having a buying/selling (two separate threads) in the same section and my reasoning stating that they have different purposes. This is just going to clutter up the forums.

Suicide botting and with breaks, how long for each? o.o Thanks for this insightful post. Not sure what I'd do without it.

Just wondering.

http://osbot.org/forum/topic/49015-remove-all-my-scripts-from-the-sdn/

No thanks.

People were for it and wanted it. Staff made it happen. Once it happened, people cried saying they didn't want it. http://osbot.org/forum/topic/38068-smaller-donation-ranks/page-5#entry429696