1) First of all, In regards to the "I over paid him by giving him 200M gp instead of $200 at the time". Not once did I claim I wanted $200, I wanted 200M So whether or not GP was 1.1 at the time or not is irrelevant, I wanted 200m.
2) Secondly, Coming up with a theory that I have lined up a secondary buyer to profit (not that I need to profit any more than I already do) is absurd. I initially offered to give you the account, but due to the nature of the situation i decided to refund your gold purely down to the fact that I, as the account seller, didn't feel safe with returning the account back to you due to the fact it was just recovered. This is me looking out for you and you try to turn this around into a conspiracy?
3.1) " People only pay top dollar for the account when the seller has great rep as well as a GOOD history of selling accounts and standing by his accounts he has sold when the buyer runs into an issue (Account gets locked, hacked, etc...) This is my opinion on why I was getting a 350$ offer and possibly more over the weekend (Now that I have time to show the account to the buyers)."
3.2) "Note: Keep in mind in no way on my thread offsite did I mention I am the original owner so you don't think I'm trying to be deceptive here."
Now then. You open up with point 3.1 and build up a back story like, you had an account with this standing, considering I don't actively sell accounts, and I am not known for such, this point is invalid unless you're referring to your own reputation on PB. Which then leads to point 3.2, if you're not claiming you're the OO, then why on your PB thread do you not state that you're not the original owner. Which leads me to believe you're trying to base the account price off your reputation which would nullify point 3.1
As for the total Work done on the account
1-53 fishing
13-70 cooking
30-51fm
41-56 wc
1-59 farming
52-54 agility
18-50 herblore
17-53 thieving
35-61 crafting
14-56 fleching
1-9 hunter
38-47 rc
72-75 prayer
98-99 attack
50-176 qp
was this which is not worth 200$
as for proof :