sudoinit6

Sorry man but that is WAY too small a sample size for the conclusions you are drawing.

Mind elaborating on what you mean by this and how you know it is true?

I cut out all the bullshit and identified the problem.

HWID means nothing. If they banned based on HWID the 35 bots I run each day would all be banned.

It's pretty simple, many of my scripts do it. get widget containing text if widget is not null interact abort I mean it would be cool if it were in the API but I figured out a simple way and I don't even JAVA well.

You are a quicker learner than I am, my friend!

Good luck, I would be interested but I am afraid of P2P botting. Lost too many bots to bans before they made the 3 mil back.

I get that. That was the past, good job fixing that. Now what about fixing the things that broke while fixing that?

As of tonight under any script they just sit there and timeout until they relogin.

Or you are smart enough to stay away from the chore that is keeping kids civil on the internet. Talk about mission impossible.

This is tut island right now, literally all baldies. I hand made an account and logged in, the char customize screen closed by itself 3 seconds after it opened.

I am pretty sure it won't take long before the actual players get annoyed that their alts look like bots. In the mean time I will make as many cosmetic changes as I can in 5 seconds.

Yeah, I watched the bot some more and it starts to customize but since it never get to hit accept any changes in that amount of time is lost. Strange change for them to make.

That's what I thought too but like I said even when I create a new account by hand it is skipping that screen when I manually login to it. Somethings up.

I noticed that since the update to RS yesterday my character customization randomness wasn't working. I then made a couple accounts manually and when I logged into them it skipped through the character customization screen and while it was always the case that many bots in tut island had the default look, now they all do. Anyone know what's up?

This is important. This deserves attention. /sarcasm

I am not an expert but it has been my experience that if there is data in the proxy window and the "use proxy" box is checked the client will absolutely try and use that as a proxy. If the proxy is down or the data is bad the client can not launch properly (you will get a SOCKS proxy configuration error). If you are super paranoid, install proxifier which will send ALL your data through a proxy and has a GUI that will verify this for you.

This. Experience > all. I work in IT. I don't have a college degree, I don't have any active certs (I have gotten some certs along the way but they have long expired), what I do have is a resume with almost 2 decades of IT experience. Now I am an old fart and when I started the degree wasn't as necessary to get your foot in the door as it is now, back then all you had to do was prove that you knew stuff. But the point is you learn more by doing than any class can teach you. I go to technical courses from time to time, employers paid for VMware training when we wanted to viirtualize. The classes were good but I never really "got" it until I built that first cluster.

What...the....actual...f? *smh* I'd be willing to help you at no cost. If you are interested PM me. But please, stop re-installing the OS! Qualifications: IRL job is Unix sys admin for the past 10 years, did windows admin stuff before that.

What he said. If the net is in your inventory you tell the bot to drop (because inventory isn't empty) and in drop you say drop all but net. Endless loop of doing nothing.

At the risk of being pedantic: You can run multiple VPN clients on the same computer and then assign each instance of OSBot to a different virtual interface via its PID. I am aware that is beyond the scope of what the OP will be able to technically handle, but I am pointing it out just in case someone else reading this needs ideas. I used to roll that way, 30 VPN connections coming out of one laptop going to 30 different endpoints.

Not sure if this qualifies as a snippet, but it is something that I have had to work around for awhile now, and I just figured out a solution so I thought I would share in hopes that it helps someone else. I bounce my proxies every day and use a dynamic dns service to give them a fqdn (fully qualified domain name). This made automating the creation of new batch files to launch bots a bit tricky as the ip of the proxy would be different every day, now it's a breeze. This is the batch file for the launch of the bot: for /f "tokens=1,2 delims=[]" %%A in ('ping proxyname.host.com ^| find "Pinging"') do set ipaddress=%%B java -jar "osbot 2.4.67.jar" -login alek:password -bot alek@osbot.com:password:1234 -debug 5005 -script test:param1 -proxy %ipaddress%:1080:proxusername:proxpassword The variable %ipaddress% will be set to the fqnd that was pinged in the first command. Probably not useful to many but there it is.

Thank you so much cape! This worked beautifully (after adding a couple "script." pre-fixes). I take back all of the bad things I said about you in chat when you weren't there

Thanks. In all the above examples I get variable can't be resolved (n p whichever I use) and a syntax error on -> (it says - or -- expected). I suspect this has something to do with the structure of my script, having to add "script." as a prefix to most everything. That's pretty much how I "learned", I took someone else's script and modified to do what I want.