Acerd Posted March 7, 2015 Share Posted March 7, 2015 we will not forget you @Cinnamon u were da bes rip Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scotty Posted March 7, 2015 Share Posted March 7, 2015 we will miss u cinnacat hope u have a good afterlife Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jamaica Posted March 7, 2015 Share Posted March 7, 2015 r0fl that trusted guy Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PoleNime Posted March 7, 2015 Share Posted March 7, 2015 r.i.p Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Anne Posted March 7, 2015 Share Posted March 7, 2015 Scammers shouldnt be 1. Remembered 2. Missed 3. Coming back Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Takeoff Posted March 7, 2015 Share Posted March 7, 2015 If by best you mean a boy who is unwilling to do what is required of him then sure. do you know what scamming means? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pink Clay Posted March 7, 2015 Share Posted March 7, 2015 sc4m Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Takeoff Posted March 7, 2015 Share Posted March 7, 2015 Yes. Point? you say he is required to refund, which would be true if his intentions were not to scam.. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rokx Posted March 7, 2015 Share Posted March 7, 2015 no Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Takeoff Posted March 7, 2015 Share Posted March 7, 2015 He is required to refund regardless of his intentions. yea if he's a nice guy who's not a scammer..how hard is it to understand Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Takeoff Posted March 7, 2015 Share Posted March 7, 2015 It may be my tired and fatigued mind, but I'm not too sure what point is that you're trying to get across to me. He was a nice guy? He's a scammer? He's not a scammer? All in all, I don't care. My post was made only to emphasize that he should have manned up, taken responsilibity, and refunded the gentlemen who was given the short end of the stick. It would be the right thing to do. yes i agree his morals are lacking, but if his intention was to scam he willingly sacrificed his reputation for the $, thus no requirement to refund (in his mind) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jamez Posted March 7, 2015 Share Posted March 7, 2015 Rip in pieces, Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pecman Posted March 7, 2015 Share Posted March 7, 2015 i don't like the influx of newfags jumping to the conclusion that cinnacat meant to scam, or indeed did scam... he's somewhat innocent in my eyes, i trust him enough to believe what he is saying Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scotty Posted March 7, 2015 Share Posted March 7, 2015 i don't like the influx of newfags jumping to the conclusion that cinnacat meant to scam, or indeed did scam... he's somewhat innocent in my eyes, i trust him enough to believe what he is saying although, i am sure there is evidence i don't know about, so i am sure he is guilty if sir maldesto judges so Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Apaec Posted March 7, 2015 Share Posted March 7, 2015 what happened? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...