March 7, 201510 yr If by best you mean a boy who is unwilling to do what is required of him then sure. do you know what scamming means?
March 7, 201510 yr Yes. Point? you say he is required to refund, which would be true if his intentions were not to scam..
March 7, 201510 yr He is required to refund regardless of his intentions. yea if he's a nice guy who's not a scammer..how hard is it to understand
March 7, 201510 yr It may be my tired and fatigued mind, but I'm not too sure what point is that you're trying to get across to me. He was a nice guy? He's a scammer? He's not a scammer? All in all, I don't care. My post was made only to emphasize that he should have manned up, taken responsilibity, and refunded the gentlemen who was given the short end of the stick. It would be the right thing to do. yes i agree his morals are lacking, but if his intention was to scam he willingly sacrificed his reputation for the $, thus no requirement to refund (in his mind)
March 7, 201510 yr i don't like the influx of newfags jumping to the conclusion that cinnacat meant to scam, or indeed did scam... he's somewhat innocent in my eyes, i trust him enough to believe what he is saying
March 7, 201510 yr i don't like the influx of newfags jumping to the conclusion that cinnacat meant to scam, or indeed did scam... he's somewhat innocent in my eyes, i trust him enough to believe what he is saying although, i am sure there is evidence i don't know about, so i am sure he is guilty if sir maldesto judges so
Create an account or sign in to comment