lolmanden Posted April 22, 2014 Author Share Posted April 22, 2014 (edited) 100 successful trades is plenty to demonstrate trustworthiness. Sure it does only the fact that you fail to demonstrate the examples of people who did not scam that are 100-199 feedbacks+ considered to people who did actually scam at that amount. You cannot just go and say like that it's like saying ''I am not a scammer, you go first.''. Empty statement from you, yet again. Edited April 22, 2014 by lolmanden Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nick Posted April 22, 2014 Share Posted April 22, 2014 Sure it does only the fact that you fail to demonstrate the examples of people who did not scam that are 100 feedbacks+ considered to people who did actually scam at that amount. You cannot just go and say like that it's like saying ''I am not a scammer, you go first.''. Empty statement from you, yet again. Rofl? Look at the top 5 feed backed users, look at Pink Clay, look at Arctic who would have it if he had VIP+. The list of users who are verified and have not scammed outnumbers your little list by a long shot. You need to learn how to grow up and have a discussion without attempting to provoke an argument through pitiful insults. It gets quite annoying after awhile. 5 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lolmanden Posted April 22, 2014 Author Share Posted April 22, 2014 (edited) Rofl? Look at the top 5 feed backed users, look at Pink Clay, look at Arctic who would have it if he had VIP+. The list of users who are verified and have not scammed outnumbers your little list by a long shot. You need to learn how to grow up and have a discussion without attempting to provoke an argument through pitiful insults. It gets quite annoying after awhile. I edited a bit ago, I said 100-199 feedback in those average as we are talking about the new requirement which I suggested 200 feedback. Not those 1000's or 500's feedback guys. And you are telling me only Pink clay out of the members i've told that are banned. And if you take my insults too seriously then sorry did not meant to do. Though don't insult back, I thought you're a moderator and not an ex-staff. Edited April 22, 2014 by lolmanden 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RoomScape Posted April 22, 2014 Share Posted April 22, 2014 I agree. This site is growing and we should compensate by escalating the verified requirements. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nick Posted April 22, 2014 Share Posted April 22, 2014 I edited a bit ago, I said 100-199 feedback in those average as we are talking about the new requirement which I suggested 200 feedback. Not those 1000's or 500's feedback guys. And you are telling me only Pink clay out of the members i've told that are banned. And if you take my insults too seriously then sorry did not meant to do. Though don't insult back, I thought you're a moderator and not an ex-staff. The verified rank is for those 100+ You can't just make up a scenario and restrict it within 100-199 feedback. That's irrelevant and defeats the purpose of the rank; and yes, you're right. I am a moderator, but I'm not going to baby you and make you feel like you're the only user here. I'd rather criticize you here on an online forum then see you get in trouble by speaking to a person of higher authority such as your boss or parents in such a derogatory way. Anyways, let's stay on topic from here on I guess. :c 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lights Posted April 22, 2014 Share Posted April 22, 2014 I think that it's flawed how somebody could sell bonds for feedback, make minimal profit and then become 'verified' Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Regretz Posted April 22, 2014 Share Posted April 22, 2014 (edited) I edited a bit ago, I said 100-199 feedback in those average as we are talking about the new requirement which I suggested 200 feedback. Not those 1000's or 500's feedback guys. And you are telling me only Pink clay out of the members i've told that are banned. And if you take my insults too seriously then sorry did not meant to do. Though don't insult back, I thought you're a moderator and not an ex-staff. No reason to insult anyone. It's in the rules 12 member list, took 5 minutes to dig up. All 100-199 FB that haven't scammed. Double your list. - 173 @Pink Clay - 142 @Timekeeper - 124 @Kaii - 100 @Justin (supremeleader) - 135 - 158 @Dan - 116 @Somic - 155 @Olaf (requested self ban) - 160 - 131 @Ricky - 177 @Mikasa - 103 Edited April 22, 2014 by Regretz 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
snaes Posted April 22, 2014 Share Posted April 22, 2014 Stop trying to be funny, I'd laugh to a snail rather than you. What the fuck? 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RoomScape Posted April 22, 2014 Share Posted April 22, 2014 This site is growing and so is the market. I think it should be upped to 150 or 200 fb, possibly. That's just my opinion, though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ImaRawrrr Posted April 22, 2014 Share Posted April 22, 2014 how bout we stop our bitchin' and moanin'? People try hard to get their FB to Verified. The people who scammed all had their runs. It's nature. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lolmanden Posted April 22, 2014 Author Share Posted April 22, 2014 No reason to insult anyone. It's in the rules 12 member list, took 5 minutes to dig up. All 100-199 FB that haven't scammed. Double your list. - 173 @Pink Clay - 142 @Timekeeper - 124 @Kaii - 100 @Justin (supremeleader) - 135 - 158 @Dan - 116 @Somic - 155 @Olaf (requested self ban) - 160 - 131 @Ricky - 177 @Mikasa - 103 Olaf did scam, look at the disputes. And so? It's still 50% of the people. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Eliot Posted April 22, 2014 Share Posted April 22, 2014 If those involved in the market feel it'd be a good move, I would support it, however only if those already in the verified group remain grandfathered into the group. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
centrino345 Posted April 22, 2014 Share Posted April 22, 2014 In this thread: OP just insults everyone who he doesn't agree with, using phrases like "go rethink what you just said" as his arguments. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jeff Posted April 22, 2014 Share Posted April 22, 2014 I didn't have an issue with this but the way your defending it makes me want to rethink everything. First off, verified is a pointless title given to people who do trades worth 2 to 3 dollars. It's pretty easy to sell bonds and get 25+ feedback in a day, I've seen it happen before. Scams are going to occur whether they're verified or not and I don't think raising the feedback to 200 will help. I wouldn't say 500 would help either. I think it would be a select few people who have really displayed a great attitude, and also great services on their time in osbot. Here I say, no person who sold bonds for majority of there feedback should be verified unless they have a lot high valued feedback also. Hypothetically, I would give BawsZ, Divica, and Probemas verified. Debate users like Cinnamon and Roomscape. An easy way we whole bond seller guy feedback farm is add another option to the feedback plugin. Add an option to put "Worth" in for the trade. It is a mandatory option, it will show how much gp was risked etc. I know there could be issues with it but I think it'd be better than a lot of other options. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ricky Posted April 22, 2014 Share Posted April 22, 2014 I didn't have an issue with this but the way your defending it makes me want to rethink everything. First off, verified is a pointless title given to people who do trades worth 2 to 3 dollars. It's pretty easy to sell bonds and get 25+ feedback in a day, I've seen it happen before. Scams are going to occur whether they're verified or not and I don't think raising the feedback to 200 will help. I wouldn't say 500 would help either. I think it would be a select few people who have really displayed a great attitude, and also great services on their time in osbot. Here I say, no person who sold bonds for majority of there feedback should be verified unless they have a lot high valued feedback also. Hypothetically, I would give BawsZ, Divica, and Probemas verified. Debate users like Cinnamon and Roomscape. An easy way we whole bond seller guy feedback farm is add another option to the feedback plugin. Add an option to put "Worth" in for the trade. It is a mandatory option, it will show how much gp was risked etc. I know there could be issues with it but I think it'd be better than a lot of other options. Agreed! Bond trades are a max of $10 trades. Most of my fb is gold and I'm proud of it. Its pretty bs how some guy comes along selling $2-3 worth of bonds at a time and gets a shitload of feedback. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
