If you're going to set a limit, make it universal. Don't just take it from graphics.

 

Make a 500k for feedback limit for EVERYTHING and problem solved. Don't get rid of feedback for graphics.

 

I think it should be 1m then. $1.50 Isn't trustworthy either. I could most likely find that in the couch too. Even $3 but I mean I guess a price should be set rather then gold as gold is losing cash value. Should be like a $5 minimum. Something like that.

I think it should be 1m then. $1.50 Isn't trustworthy either. I could most likely find that in the couch too. Even $3 but I mean I guess a price should be set rather then gold as gold is losing cash value. Should be like a $5 minimum. Something like that.

 

I think it should be a 500k minimum. 500K is $1.50 and maybe it isn't much to you, but it's definitely worth a feedback.

Your argument should be that low currency transactions shouldn't be applicable for feedback, I feel this has nothing to do with graphics.

 

I plan on implementing a verified rank which will require not only a lot of feedback, but also several large transactions. I won't be implementing a rule for transaction amount/feedback. That ruins the purpose. If you raise the cap on how much can be used as feedback, then the "trust" barrier will also rise, meaning it's a never-ending process to have the feedback cap reach the trust limit. It's relative.

Well $1.50 isn't trustworthy though. $3 isn't either really. $5 should be a minimum or something.

Okay, and what about trades? 

What then? You can't just try and put us designers down because you're butt hurt that you won't ever get good feedback m8.

Your argument should be that low currency transactions shouldn't be applicable for feedback, I feel this has nothing to do with graphics.

 

I plan on implementing a verified rank which will require not only a lot of feedback, but also several large transactions. I won't be implementing a rule for transaction amount/feedback. That ruins the purpose. If you raise the cap on how much can be used as feedback, then the "trust" barrier will also rise, meaning it's a never-ending process to have the feedback cap reach the trust limit. It's relative.

 

So basically the larger the transactions and the more of them you do the more trusted you'll be? Sounds great and just how it should be.

Okay, and what about trades? 

What then? You can't just try and put us designers down because you're butt hurt that you won't ever get good feedback m8.

 

Lol you talking to me Basic? I'm butthurt and can't get good feedback when I have all gold transactions and many being 10m plus transactions and you have 0 feedback? I don't think you're in a place to talk at all.

 

EDIT. 1 feedback.

Edited June 12, 201312 yr by alexownsz5

Your argument should be that low currency transactions shouldn't be applicable for feedback, I feel this has nothing to do with graphics.

 

I plan on implementing a verified rank which will require not only a lot of feedback, but also several large transactions. I won't be implementing a rule for transaction amount/feedback. That ruins the purpose. If you raise the cap on how much can be used as feedback, then the "trust" barrier will also rise, meaning it's a never-ending process to have the feedback cap reach the trust limit. It's relative.

 

This is very well said. I think this is how it should always be.

Your argument should be that low currency transactions shouldn't be applicable for feedback, I feel this has nothing to do with graphics.

 

I plan on implementing a verified rank which will require not only a lot of feedback, but also several large transactions. I won't be implementing a rule for transaction amount/feedback. That ruins the purpose. If you raise the cap on how much can be used as feedback, then the "trust" barrier will also rise, meaning it's a never-ending process to have the feedback cap reach the trust limit. It's relative.

 

Kati pls. Kati #1. Kati the best. Support

 

OFF TOPIC - Westrice ditched. He backed out. free 100m plz

All of my feedback for graphics were removed?

Why aren't yours? Hmph.

All of my feedback for graphics were removed?

Why aren't yours? Hmph.

 

Because they paid for mine.

If you were here when I had my graphics shops open, you would know I had a shop, and sold quite a few signatures. I made speakmores signature. He left me feedback for it since he bought it. And I was personally informed it wasn't allowed. 

If you were here when I had my graphics shops open, you would know I had a shop, and sold quite a few signatures. I made speakmores signature. He left me feedback for it since he bought it. And I was personally informed it wasn't allowed. 

 

Really? By whom?

Yeah I also got two feedback removed for selling 3 memberships to the same guy. I could have just sold the 2 others to a different person but I sold them to him. Each time he trusted me with 2.75m which is worthy for a vouch so why should I deserve one when it was three different transactions?

@Jason;

 

 

I believe it was removed by an Admin.

 

I never really bothered asking though.

Lol? Are you serious? 

Come on now, don't be so immature.