Why is it even allowed. There is like 1% trust involved. The person makes the graphics and then pays like 100k for it. Such little trust not even a worthy feedback. Gold and services should be able to have feedback left as long as it's a reasonable price and considering you're trusting that person with your bank. Thoughts? I just don't think people should be able to get super low 1% trust feedbacks. Then people can do this then start scamming for gold because they're "Trusted"

Before selling/buying gold you should check what feedbacks the person has, and if they traded gold before etc...

Lol? Are you serious? 

Come on now, don't be so immature.

Yeah most people just see the feedback count and don't check. Needs to be more precautions or not allowed for certain things like this to avoid this happening.

Please do explain Basic.

I agree with this 100%. 

I was told you could not vouch for graphics unless it is paid.

Yeah I know but the think is if it's 100k or 200k how is that trustworthy at all. 100k is Less then a dollar. If that's trustworthy what the fuck does 10m mean? Just think it's kinda fucked up how you can sell 100k-200k signatures and get feedback on here and then get considered "Trusted"

No support. It's basically a service for a price. If the graphic was paid for, then you should be able to receive feedback because one person had to trust the other. If not, then no feedback.

100% agreed. Ridiculous. 

100% agreed. Ridiculous. 

 

What do you mean? The person payed for something. I don't care how much it's for, it's a positive feedback. Yes, some feedbacks can be more expensive and give 'more trust' but that doesn't mean these should be voided. They are feedback regardless. I get feedback for selling 1m, why wouldn't I get it for selliing a sig for 1m.

 

Also, some graphics can be very expensive, and it's unfair if a user paid 6M and can't feedback.

No support. It's basically a service for a price. If the graphic was paid for, then you should be able to receive feedback because one person had to trust the other. If not, then no feedback.

 

Please explain how 100k or 200k is remotely trustworthy. That's 30-60 cents. Lol. SO trustworthy. Compare that to a gold seller who gets trusted with 5m minimum usually per transaction. Some MUCH more. That is a trustworthy vouch as that is worth much more then the change I can find in my couch.

Please explain how 100k or 200k is remotely trustworthy. That's 30-60 cents. Lol. SO trustworthy. Compare that to a gold seller who gets trusted with 5m minimum usually per transaction. Some MUCH more. That is a trustworthy vouch as that is worth much more then the change I can find in my couch.

 

If you're going to set a limit, make it universal. Don't just take it from graphics.

 

Make a 500k for feedback limit for EVERYTHING and problem solved. Don't get rid of feedback for graphics.

If they're expensive, That's understandable but even then it's not actual money involved besides the gold. It's just a matter if the person sends the complete sig or not.

If they're expensive, That's understandable but even then it's not actual money involved besides the gold. It's just a matter if the person sends the complete sig or not.

 

Same can be said with services. It's just a matter if someone completes the service or not.

People can run off with signatures without paying as well, I've had it happen on forums where I charged.

I agree, you can put a watermark, then get money, and remove it.

If you scam, you're an idiot, not involving that much trust.