osrsphat Posted April 6, 2017 Posted April 6, 2017 3 minutes ago, dragonite3000 said: He is against botting but doing an "experiment". Showing off @Token quester like every other video and he gets like 50k views. He's not against botting lol, all he does is bot. He goldfarms etc.
dragonite3000 Posted April 6, 2017 Author Posted April 6, 2017 37 minutes ago, osrsphat said: He's not against botting lol, all he does is bot. He goldfarms etc. He stated it one of his videos that he does not bot?! And damn sure does not use it for goldfarming. Please link me to where he said that.
Somebody Posted April 6, 2017 Posted April 6, 2017 It's an interesting concept, but pretty bad youtuber
Knuckolls Posted April 7, 2017 Posted April 7, 2017 57 minutes ago, Marteezy said: Is abc2 a anti ban, sorry I'm not well informed Neither am I I came across some chicken killer bots the other day saying "Toyota, Garage, Ford, Peanut, Come on!" randomly every minute or two. random spastic words in all chat = l33t god entity anti-ban
Eliot Posted April 7, 2017 Posted April 7, 2017 (edited) 6 hours ago, Final said: As I've said, this shit is actually scamming. I'm not going to lie to customers and tell them that my scripts are going to lower their ban rate from another bespoken script. It's just bullshit, unless their scripts consist of some neural network machine learning fuckery, i don't wanna read the word antiban in their script thread. While I agree most "antiban" is useless, there are a number of techniques which actually have potential to reduce bans (these do not require "neural network machine learning fuckery"). Most antiban in public scripts is there because the users demand it, not because it is effective in reducing the chance of bans. Much of these traditional techniques may actually increase the chance of a ban by increasing the amount of routine and observable inputs the bot is performing. Over time, these "antiban" techniques could actually provide more evidence of botting. Edited April 7, 2017 by Eliot 1
Final Posted April 7, 2017 Posted April 7, 2017 (edited) 10 hours ago, Eliot said: While I agree most "antiban" is useless, there are a number of techniques which actually have potential to reduce bans (these do not require "neural network machine learning fuckery"). Most antiban in public scripts is there because the users demand it, not because it is effective in reducing the chance of bans. Much of these traditional techniques may actually increase the chance of a ban by increasing the amount of routine and observable inputs the bot is performing. Over time, these "antiban" techniques could actually provide more evidence of botting. Obviously I was joking, there is a big difference with designing and implementing an anti-ban system and generating a random number and wiggling the mouse a bit. The misconception is that people think there is a system behind the word 'antiban' in most scripts, when actually it's a 'random mouse movement' or something of the sort which in my opinion is false advertising. If people such as yourself wish to invest time into attempting to design and implement a system. I'm not discouraging it at all, I'm trying to discourage false advertising in the scene because it's ultimately slowing progression of everything and ruining the market most importantly (which fuels progression). Edited April 7, 2017 by Final 1
Prolax Posted April 7, 2017 Posted April 7, 2017 10 hours ago, Tylar245 said: Neither am I I came across some chicken killer bots the other day saying "Toyota, Garage, Ford, Peanut, Come on!" randomly every minute or two. random spastic words in all chat = l33t god entity anti-ban That was me, I am not retardred.
Knuckolls Posted April 7, 2017 Posted April 7, 2017 1 hour ago, Prolax said: That was me, I am not retardred.
