Jonny Posted October 8, 2016 Share Posted October 8, 2016 Market Changes and Spammers. I have to admit there has been less scammers around lately but to improve on this I've made a strawpoll to keep controlling the situation. I only support 500pc change but I believe there are other options. This is a serious poll this is why it's not in spam. Any unnecessary posts will be reported. This includes; Simple replies as 'Support' or 'No Support' show that on the poll. Replies should at least contribute to the polls ideals. Strawpoll link: http://www.strawpoll.me/11388014 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RDM Posted October 8, 2016 Share Posted October 8, 2016 (edited) i was joking about 500 pc, i was more serious about like 150-200 Edit: RDM for Market Mod Edited October 8, 2016 by RDM Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jonny Posted October 8, 2016 Author Share Posted October 8, 2016 i was joking about 500 pc, i was more serious about like 150-200 All the suggestions I've seen are put into the poll. 500 was still supported so it should be in the poll. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zerker Posted October 8, 2016 Share Posted October 8, 2016 Maldesto already said he's not going to change anything in the market place. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deceiver Posted October 8, 2016 Share Posted October 8, 2016 New (Month old accounts) should be locked to a post every 30 minutes for sure, and why does Spam still increase post count? That is stupid. I am 50/50 on market moderator. I think we should add one or two people just for that section only because it only seems like half of the staff actively post on the forums outside of their scripts or disputes. Maybe they are busy or who knows, but I think it should be looked into. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ez11 Posted October 8, 2016 Share Posted October 8, 2016 "Spam Section should NOT GIVE an increase to post count" RIP @Krys 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jonny Posted October 8, 2016 Author Share Posted October 8, 2016 Maldesto already said he's not going to change anything in the market place. That's what the votes for, a public vote may be able to sway the almighty god. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Realist Posted October 8, 2016 Share Posted October 8, 2016 the first 4 in your strawpoll are very limiting & does not support a free-market in any which way promoting the use of a middleman could be more important & is not listed there i'm supportive of spam forum not giving pc, i don't know why it does in the first place & market mod: you'd need to elaborate more on that for me to make a judgement Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Decode Posted October 8, 2016 Share Posted October 8, 2016 I dont see what a market mod would do that the current mods dont already. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jonny Posted October 8, 2016 Author Share Posted October 8, 2016 the first 4 in your strawpoll are very limiting & does not support a free-market in any which way promoting the use of a middleman could be more important & is not listed there i'm supportive of spam forum not giving pc, i don't know why it does in the first place & market mod: you'd need to elaborate more on that for me to make a judgement I'm not 100% supporting on more mods even if they're category orientated. I've just made up a list of what peoples have suggested or other forums have used. However, from my point of view; someone like you etc those who use the market constantly will be more likely to spot people from afar and in my opinion someone who works in the market would be more knowledgeable than a bystander. Seeing as no moderator actually really uses the market much. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Swizzbeat Posted October 8, 2016 Share Posted October 8, 2016 Any "verified" user should have to submit (and verify) identification information to the site. This way, in the event of a scam, you can take the case to small claims court (assuming parties live in the same region). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jonny Posted October 8, 2016 Author Share Posted October 8, 2016 Any "verified" user should have to submit (and verify) identification information to the site. This way, in the event of a scam, you can take the case to small claims court (assuming parties live in the same region). They also have our contact address, emails, where we live from our purchases to the site. You need to be VIP+ to become verified Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Swizzbeat Posted October 8, 2016 Share Posted October 8, 2016 Very interesting reply, however what about the new upcoming providers? It isn't just "verified" that should be dealt with in such ways, and you do realise that we release somewhat of our own information when applying for such statuses right? As if first and last name is proof of anything lol. If you're an upcoming provider simply provide the necessary documents? I'm not sure what the big deal is. The whole "I want to keep my personal info private" argument is bullshit since if you tried to sell product anywhere else on the internet you'd be required to provide even more information. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Decode Posted October 8, 2016 Share Posted October 8, 2016 replace afkness of mods lol'd Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Swizzbeat Posted October 8, 2016 Share Posted October 8, 2016 They also have our contact address, emails, where we live from our purchases to the site. You need to be VIP+ to become verified Because no one has ever faked PayPal information before. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
