Jump to content

FrostBug

Scripter III
  • Posts

    3967
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    5
  • Feedback

    100%

Everything posted by FrostBug

  1. Looks like a bug with dismissing random events. Try to disable this in the client settings, it's kinda pointless in the first place, and I've never actually done a test run with it active. Also, within your house, you should make sure that the altar is reasonably close to your kharyrll teleport portal; AND that you have the house setting of rendering your house with all doors open enabled.
  2. The only thing I could think of is if its trying to grab a potion from the bottom of a tab where lots of scrolling down is required. This is a known bug, where it will not scroll far enough. Try to make sure that even your (1) and (2) dose potions are at the top or next to your (3)/(4) dose potions. Due to the decanting feature it will withdraw the lower ones as well
  3. public <T> void reverse(T[] array) { for(int i = 0; i < array.length >> 1; i++) { T tmp = array; array = array[array.length - 1 - i]; array[array.length - 1 - i] = tmp; } }
  4. Actually, you can just right click your attractor and toggle the magnet
  5. I still want to fix it, though. Alright, hadn't thought of that
  6. I sent you a PM. But I have to go for a while :|, will be back on soon
  7. He claims it did, I say nay. Yay or nay? this is important.
  8. Add me on skype please; If its not a config error then I should atleast be able to patch it pretty quickly if you can show it to me
  9. Make sure you're wearing your ammo when setting up the gear config
  10. FrostBug

    FrostHunter

    Please read the OP.
  11. Version 1.1.2 added - Fixed a bug with equipping a trident after recharging it - Fixed a bug with bank depositing after trident recharge
  12. Oh okay, I'll have a look at that Can you provide any extra details to the event? Was the trident entirely full? Did it successfully use the coins on the full trident again, or was the selected coins/runes merely preventing it from continuing its next action? Did it run out of one of the recharge resources before the trident was fully recharged? Sorry for the question barrage
  13. Private phone: LG G2 Work phone: Nokia Lumia 635 Previous private phone: iPhone 4s iPhone a shit
  14. There are quite a few banking issues with the current client version; hopefully they will be fixed soon. I'm not completely sure your problem is caused by these issues; but if they are, then it should be fixable by placing all the items the script needs near the top of the 'main' tab in your bank (the all-items tab)
  15. Script version 1.1.1 pushed - Patched selection bug when recharging trident - Added an option to use restore potions to recover drained stats at the bank - Modified the break taker to only activate at the bank or surface area at barrows - Added timeouts to certain interactions ____ As always, it may take up to 24 hours for the new version to go live; so keep a lookout for the version number at script start.
  16. If you can do barrows on the account manually, then the script should be able to as well.
  17. Not getting any exceptions ? Inter.interactWithChild(459, 91, "Make X"); ^ Are you certain that 'Inter' is not null at this point? Furthermore, when you call getMessage(118) on the interface, you're basically saying that both the parent and child interfaces have the same ID of 118. Are you certain that this is the case?
  18. Since you made a general suggestion, I assume we're talking about general cases. 1. Many bugs are rare occurances, they take extensive testing time to locate and patch. 2. Most scripters have multiple scripts. Releasing new scripts require loads of time running it to locate bugs and test features 3. Even running a script for as short a time as one hour CAN result in a ban, if you are unlucky It is very possible for scripters to get their accounts banned
  19. I'll put them on the TO-DO list. I can't make guarantees for a release date, though. I'm a little busy atm
  20. Depends on the level of maintenance required, I guess. A lot of scripters probably get their testing accounts banned. Temporarily not having a test account shouldn't get a script forcibly removed. Not immediately anyway. You have no obligation to share your account with any scripter. If they request it, you can simply decline. And if, as a result, the script remains broken for a prolonged period of time, I would assume that the users are refunded and the script removed. TL;DR: I think it should be handled case-by-case
  21. Fair :P, didn't realize it was a button in the depositbox
×
×
  • Create New...