Abuse

It's easy to do this in intelliJ: Open the module settings and add your library (May it be a .jar or source folder) Then go to artifacts and add your freshly added library to the build output And you're done

All right, let me show you something. I made an account through one of the IPs I have from my ISP. That IP has never seen a runescape account before. Logged onto it, did tutorial island manually, started doing quests and it got locked. Jagex turned up their bot detection to 11, Tweeting this to weath soon, just going to replicate this without the client (Account gets locked at the end of the video)

Update: I can confirm this issue is account creator related: I've made a few accounts manually, and a few automatically. The automatic accounts got locked within minutes after completing tutorial island. The manual ones didn't. I've rewritten my account creator to use a real browser (Firefox) to create the accounts and the issue got solved, no locks for past 2 hours. - Abuse

Indeed they have, Now it posts to /track/3011 when clicking the 'create account' button + they have added some obfuscated JS to their frontend

All my accounts are getting mass locked too Ill keep you guys posted if i find the source of this I fucking knew the moment that someone started to sell a mass account creator for 20$/pop this would follow shortly ...

Add me on skype marcinsleziak

Started out as a fun project, evolved into a part-time job that earns more than my full time job

It might be interesting to setup a staging/development server for you to test on, it would prevent downtime and/or a buggy site in the future

Feels good being the 1%

Be careful when setting flags to zero though, the pathfinder will see it as a tile that can be accessed from all directions, so might end up generating a unwalkable path

1 = cannot enter from west 2 = cannot enter from east 4 = cannot enter from north 8 = cannot enter from south Cannot enter from west and east = 1 | 2 Cannot enter from west, east and north = 1 | 2 | 4 etc

You can pass flags to it after filtering through getMap().getRegion().getClippingPlanes()[myPosition.getZ()].getTileFlags(); int[][] originalFlags = getMap().getRegion().getClippingPlanes()[self.myPosition().getZ()].getTileFlags(); int[][] modifiedFlags = new int[originalFlags.length][originalFlags.length]; pathFinder = new LocalPathFinder(getBot()); for (int x = 0; x < originalFlags.length; x++) { for (int y = 0; y < originalFlags.length; y++) { int originalFlag = originalFlags[x][y]; /* modify originalFlag flag here */ modifiedFlags[x][y] = originalFlag; } } pathFinder.findPath(targetPosition, modifiedFlags);

You could wrap it in a nice function like so: float getCost(int currentSpeed, int maxSpeed, boolean schoolZone){ if (currentSpeed <= maxSpeed) { /* We arent speeding */ return 0; } /* Base price of 75$ */ float price = 75; /* Add 6$ per mph over speed */ price += 6 * (currentSpeed - maxSpeed); if (currentSpeed - maxSpeed >= 30) { /* 30 mph or more to fast, add 160$ */ price += 160; } if (schoolZone) { /* We are in a school zone, double the price */ price *= 2; } return price; } It also makes uses of floats, perfect for decimals in money

I haven't had tutorial island bans yet, they genarally occurred within 4-8 hours of runtime. The IP's were unused for 10 days as I took a break from farming.

I just want to add that IP flagging is a part of jagex's anti ban system as I have found out today. I've had a pool of 200 IP's and recently I was struggling with automatic bans, tried everything within reason to prevent them (Since each bot is limited to ~2% cpu usage, i couldn't make any drastic changes without losing out on efficiency). As a final measure I've replaced my whole IP pool, and voila not a single ban for past 24 hours

Yes, you are correct. Mirror mode more than likely uses the attach api (Or a lower level implementation of it), however it is not possible to get any valuable information about attached agents, which means that, to my knowledge, it's impossible to detect OSBot using common methods. Of course process scanning is a way out, but Jagex doesn't do that.

Mirror mode duplicates the attached client state (OSBuddy in this case), and does it's computations within the clone, there won't be any reference to anything external within the attached client. Any exceptions happen in the instance

I don't recall anything ingame that has a make x option that doesn't have an animation. But yes, your solution + explv's combined together is the proper solution

That's not how things work

The scripter can just check if there is no break planned within the next 5 seconds or so using getBot().getRandomExecutor().getTimeUntilBreak() before entering the area with aggressive monsters Also, using the same condition, the scripter can exit the agressive are in time before the break handler kicks in

When I started writing my scripts, I made them modular similar to the post above, for example my tutorial island, blue Dragon, blast furnace,.. scripts all require either a main script class, or a 'proxy' class that allows me to use them separately or together in a script. The proxy class just makes sure all the onMessage, onPaint and onResponseCode gets forwarded to the correct module

What I would do is remember which two inventory slots I'm interacting with, do the desired action and sleep until one of the inventory slots is empty or contains a different item using ConditionalSleep

If you are taking the challenge, let me make it easier for you: static List<World> worlds = Arrays.asList( new World(1, false, 242,57), new World(2, true, 242, 78), new World(3, true, 242, 110), new World(4, true, 242, 131), new World(5, true, 242, 150), new World(6, true, 242, 177), new World(8, false, 242, 201), new World(9, true, 242, 222), new World(10, true, 242, 250), new World(11, true, 242, 276), new World(12, true, 242, 297), new World(13, true, 242, 319), new World(14, true, 242, 343), new World(16, false, 242, 369), new World(17, true, 242, 392), new World(18, true, 242, 412), new World(19, true, 242, 439), new World(20, true, 242, 363), new World(21, true, 335, 57), new World(22, true, 335, 83), new World(26, false, 335, 128), new World(27, true, 335, 156), new World(28, true, 335, 177), new World(29, true, 335, 199), new World(30, true, 335, 223), new World(33, true, 335, 252), new World(34, true, 335, 270), new World(35, false, 335, 301), new World(36, true, 335, 322), new World(38, true, 335, 368), new World(41, true, 335, 393), new World(42, true, 335, 416), new World(43, true, 335, 445), new World(44, true, 335, 463), new World(46, true, 426, 81), new World(50, true, 426, 129), new World(51, true, 426, 151), new World(52, true, 426, 176), new World(54, true, 426, 224), new World(57, true, 426, 249), new World(58, true, 426, 278), new World(59, true, 426, 297), new World(60, true, 426, 319), new World(62, true, 426, 372), new World(67, true, 426, 441), new World(68, true, 426, 464), new World(69, true, 517, 52), new World(70, true, 517, 80), new World(74, true, 517, 125), new World(75, true, 517, 152), new World(76, true, 517, 175), new World(77, true, 517, 202), new World(82, false, 517, 277), new World(83, false, 517, 299), new World(84, false, 517, 319), new World(86, true, 517, 370), new World(93, false, 517, 389), new World(94, false, 517, 317) ); Last two parameters of the World class are x and y mouse positions for that particular world on the world select screen It was painful to write

EDIT: I posted in the wrong thread, don't drink and type

Recovery attempt was unsuccessful, Fly refunded me 120m Funny how I felt the urge to remove all wealth from the account prior to this dispute .. no damage was caused