Team Cape

im doing it now on varrock and haven't gotten the issue yet after 10 runs. I've added in a failsafe just in case (should be available this weekend). how often does it happen?

dang i forgot about this for a couple days lol

no one will share and crash their own moneymaking methods bro. you gotta find ur own lol

Dude needs to be banned. He obviously tried to scam - Paypal doesn't just charge back > 1 payment randomly. He was obviously trying to scam, then realized it wasn't working when he lost the first dispute and that he'd only get a small amount. Now he wants to come back so he can just scam more later on. It's literally this simple. Can we just ban him and get on with it?

From my perspective, it's like this: Multiple people ( e.g. @Sysm / @Starcraft ) have said that he charged back. Paypal doesn't magically charge-back and open disputes by itself - the act is committed by one of the traders. The fact that he did this to more than one person is further proof that it was not a mistake. Now that he realizes that he's not going to lose TWC, and that he could get a lot more if he just sticks with it and scams more people later, he'll be refunding back the measly $20 that he would've gotten otherwise. It's as simple as this: He charged back more than one person (hence it was not a 'mistake') He attempted to scam for a small amount He realized the small amount wasn't worth it - he could scam more if he waited instead of starting over again from a different account. He refunded the small amount so he could get a bigger amount later. He shouldn't even come back with TWC. He needs to be banned, or else he will undoubtedly scam someone unknowing in the future. It's pretty much case closed. TLDR - It's proven that he tried to scam. Why would we let him do it again?

http://osbot.org/forum/topic/106643-rip-scammer-lost-charge-back/ 2pac tried to charge-back another player as well. This is an obvious scam attempt, just like it was with @@Sysm. This user needs to be banned because it's clear that he still has the complete intention of scamming; it wasn't just a one-time occurrence. Eventually, he'll scam someone new (hence losing someone from OSBot) or someone that doesn't know the community that well. It's only a matter of time, and I say that we shouldn't wait for it. Feel free to delete this if you want.

good shit u could make this any item by adding a string in the gui though then have an option to interact on it. would be pretty cool. edit: my bad. forgot this was from a few months ago lmao. im digging more graves than charles manson right now

Interesting. I will check this out in the next day and update it. Thanks for reporting

what a retard

[NOTE: GRAPHIC]

toaster

"literally 99% of the big scammers have been people that joined in the past few months and immediately bought lifetime sponsor (like within the first month of being here)" Wasn't aware that July 2013 was 1 month ago

In the time that I've been here (like 4 months or something?), literally 99% of the big scammers have been people that joined in the past few months and immediately bought lifetime sponsor (like within the first month of being here). maybe it's all the same person, who knows, but i cant help but notice that it's been a consistent trend. i am by no means saying that all people that fit into this category are scammers, but i can't help but notice the relative consistency. anyone else seen this sort of trend?

im arab and can confirm that shouting is usually far louder and more angry than this.

back

These are my words: (and the sleep times are pretty wtf too), Alek has seen my work and knows I don't do that. I wrote this up in like 3 minutes as pseudocode to explain my thought process lol

sick bro

no more rank??? edit: nvm it appeared for me once the page reloaded

the trick to good antiban is sleeping for at least 13241789348483218242 ms

The majority that I've seen on antiban is something along the lines of: public class Class extends Script { public int doScript(); public boolean antiBan() { //possibility one switch(random(0, 10)) { case 1: return tabs.open(Tab.INVENTORY); case 2: sleep(random(4123412, 13241789348483218242)); return randomNPC.hover(); case 3: case 4: return moveYourCamera(); case 5: return true; . . . } //possibility two (just a messier version of the 1st possibility) int random = random(0, 100); if(random < 20) { return doShit; } else if(random >= 20 && random <= 40) { return doAnotherShit; } else if(...) { return etc; } return false; } public int onLoop() { if(antiBan()) { return random(1523, 521983); } return doScript(); } } This is a very dumbed down version, granted, and I doubt that anyone would really break down the methods in the way that I did here (and the sleep times are pretty wtf too), but this seems very rudimentary and repetitive, and will only likely help an account get banned. Antiban is can also be placed inside of doScript(), but it still has the same effect. I've noticed this in multiple scripts, and I've started to realize that this kind of antiban actually aids in getting the player banned, so I've stopped adding it. There needs to be a way to randomize this more, or make it far less obvious. Has anyone found a better technique? TLDR: I'm looking for a way to make antiban more efficient in terms of both randomization and structure;

Significant. This sounds a lot like asking someone their salary... it's personal. If they want to share, they should feel free to, but it's not right to ask them like that - especially not in a public thread.

there wasnt an option for 'not pug' so i didnt vote.

@@Maldesto @@Dex

probability will be on my side if i post more often!

just getting my daily free postcount. dont mind me