LoudPacks

The web request stuff I wrote supports proxies already so it will be easy to implement, Ill post here when I add it. Then the account list will have optional: user:pass:ip:port:user:pass

INFO A tool that will import a list of accounts in the format: user:pass user:pass user:pass And check the accounts status of each account using web requests made to the Runescape website. Accounts are checked and written to two output files in the selected directory: Selected Directory/Banned_Accounts.txt user:pass ban_message user:pass ban_message Selected Directory/Safe_Accounts.txt user:pass user:pass IMAGES DOWNLOAD http://www.mediafire.com/file/vmmb5ci96fa4764/BanChecker.jar NOTES No, this does not steal your account info. Feel free to decompile it if you're worried, I have chosen not to obfuscate it. I can add proxy support if people really want it.

If you have a PC near the modem and said PC can be connected via ethernet and also has a wifi card you can just bridge the connections and then connect to your network thru the PC. You could buy a wifi signal booster. You could buy a raspberry pi 3 for around $35 and use that for the first option if you only have one computer.

why u do dis

Thats fucking awesome, what a meme.

IS frostBOGE A MOD?

I can verify if needed

If they meant opposite ends well then just turn the boat 90 degrees

Idk make me one and ill get back to you

RS2Object object = api.getObjects().get(o -> o.hasAction("Examine")); //Make sure to null check it too before you use it. //If you need a collection you can just do RS2Object[] / List<RS2Object> objectList = api.getObjects().getAll(); for(RS2Object object : objectList){ if(object != null && object.hasAction("Examine")){ object.interact("Examine"); //sleep here probably } }

Or you could also create a separate class instead of using nested classes. I would look into a task based system if you want to be more organized. There's several tutorials on the site about how to do this. Basically each 'task' has its own class and then in your main class you just add a new instance of each task to the task manager, which loops through each task and executes it if it should be active, which is determined by a method inside each task class, usually isActive() which would return a boolean depending on the condition you place within said method. Then you can have a task / separate class for banking per say, and another for combat, etc. in Main.java: @[member='Override'] public void onStart() { Settings settings = new Settings(this); settings.setCallback(b -> { addTask(new SwapTask(this)); addTask(new TradeTask(this)); }); } in TradeTask.java for example: package com.loudpacks.script; import org.osbot.rs07.api.map.Area; import org.osbot.rs07.api.model.Player; import org.osbot.rs07.api.model.RS2Object; import org.osbot.rs07.script.MethodProvider; import org.osbot.rs07.utility.ConditionalSleep; import com.loudpacks.api.Task; import com.loudpacks.gui.Settings; public class TradeTask extends Task { private final Area RUINS = new Area(2386, 4829, 2415, 4855); private final Area INNER_RUINS = new Area(2404, 4837, 2395, 4845); private final Area PORTAL_AREA = new Area(2402, 4833, 2397, 4836); public TradeTask(MethodProvider api){ super(api); } @[member=Override] public boolean isActive() { return RUINS.contains(api.myPlayer()); } @[member=Override] public void onStart() { } @[member=Override] public void onLoop() { // code to execute when active } @[member=Override] public void onEnd() { } }

Disputed Member:[member=username] Why it should be removed: The script ran flawlessly and did everything the user wanted. I even told him what "antiban" features would be added in advance and he said it sounded good. Details: I made him a fire orb script and he ran it on his 87 agility account over night. There is always a possibility of getting banned and he knew this. The script itself ran fine, seeing as he ran it overnight without any issues other than getting banned. I would like the neutral feedback to be removed as well as his negative review on my private script shop (since he only left it as a result of getting banned not a poorly written script or poor interaction with me). Link to topic: http://osbot.org/forum/topic/84400-%E2%98%85-loudpacks-private-script-shop-fast-turn-around-high-quality-fully-customizable-%E2%98%85/

But then new people will never be able to sell accounts or request price checks. And to be honest I never understood why the 100 pc rule exists. If someone wants to scam they're gonna scam whether they have to get 100 pc or not.

I assume this is linked to a script that will actually stake other players in the duel arena? The app just letting you see whats going on / control it?

They are separate. Im gold IV solo but Silver IV flex 3s

If anyone could let me borrow their chegg account that would be cool. Since they ban you if a lot of different people use the same acc Im working on a program that would run on a vps and send the solutions to a client so that to them it looks like only a single person is using the account and only one person needs to pay or a group of friends can split the cost. I have the client side done but I need an account now to work on the server side. Here's what it looks like so far: Ideally, you would click grab solution, it would send the URL to the VPS, the VPS which would be using the account would grab the HTML from the solution and send it back to the client where it would be loaded and available for vewing by an unlimited number of users without getting the original account banned.

I mean I set up 2 bots talking to each other and response times were ~<= 1s apart (every so often it would take a couple seconds). It would still be a good idea though none the less. I would assume users would only be sending one message at a time.

Yes that would be a good idea, usually its instant but sometimes it can take a few seconds.

Library jar: http://www.mediafire.com/file/i5c5fkni41m78d9/ChatterBotLib.jar Snippet: ChatterBotFactory factory = new ChatterBotFactory(); ChatterBot bot = factory.create(ChatterBotType.CLEVERBOT); ChatterBotSession botSession = bot.createSession(); String response = botSession.think("Text you want to respond to."); System.out.println(response); Sample: Now if you want it for your scripts just put it into the onMessage maybe with some conditions about when it should respond / who it should respond to, etc. I would run it on a separate thread incase the response takes a little while to complete.

I never liked him anyway RIP tho he will be missed

Assignment: Current Code: public class Main { public static int RecursiveFirst(int n) throws IllegalArgumentException { if (n <= 0) { throw new IllegalArgumentException(); } else if (n == 1) { return 1; } else if ((n % 2) == 0) { return 1 + RecursiveFirst(n / 2); } else { return 1 + RecursiveFirst(n - 1); } } public static void main(String Args[]) { int r = 0; for (int i = 1; i < 100; i++) { r = RecursiveFirst(i); System.out.println(r); } } } I have 0 idea on how to improve the run time of the algorithm so if anyone has ideas that would be nice. Edit: what I came up with: public static int RecursiveFirst(int n) throws IllegalArgumentException { ArrayList<Integer> res = new ArrayList<Integer>(); res.add(n); while (n != 1) { if (n == 0) { throw new IllegalArgumentException(); } else if (n % 2 == 0) { n = 1 + (n / 2); res.add(n); } else { n = 1 + (n - 1); res.add(n); } n /= 2; } return res.size(); } public static void main(String Args[]) { for (int i = 1; i <= 10000; i++) { System.out.println(RecursiveFirst(i)); } }