Skip to content
View in the app

A better way to browse. Learn more.

OSBot :: 2007 OSRS Botting

A full-screen app on your home screen with push notifications, badges and more.

To install this app on iOS and iPadOS
  1. Tap the Share icon in Safari
  2. Scroll the menu and tap Add to Home Screen.
  3. Tap Add in the top-right corner.
To install this app on Android
  1. Tap the 3-dot menu (⋮) in the top-right corner of the browser.
  2. Tap Add to Home screen or Install app.
  3. Confirm by tapping Install.

Dashboard

Java Lifetime Sponsor
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Dashboard

  1. Dashboard replied to Aart1's topic in Archive
    They're junk, and they're not rare.
  2. How much then?
  3. Am looking for an account with 55 slayer, I do not care about other stats/quests, but would be willing to pay well for a good account. Must have 0 bans, do not care about membership status.
  4. Update as of Oct 30th (made it get 9 kc, and added more fail safes to make it absolutely stable, still need to improve chests/h):
  5. And who said that it wouldn't be free?
  6. Can somebody just give me two warning points to shut this kid up?
  7. Sorry my friend. I recall OSBot being a much happier place when I joined.
  8. Let's try an analogy here. OSBot is a high school, and we're both in the same Mathematics class. You're sitting next to me during a test. I spend some time solving a problem and create a solution (SSF). You decided not to spend time yourself and looked at my test to see how I did it, and copied my work (exactly). And then you finished the test and gave it to the teacher (SDN testing). Now I'm realizing that you copied my Math test, and intend on getting a good grade from it (money). While cheating on a school test may not be illegal, it's against the rules in a school as it's academic dishonesty. You never approached me asking if you could use my format, nor had you notified me. I had to find out on my own that you were going to be selling it on the SDN. You're asking me why you shouldn't copy my test as it's "legally right at my [your] fingertips". Now you want to re-do the test as you've been caught. I know where I go to school, the teachers would laugh at such a proposal. I don't recall giving much input on QBot's script rather than mentioning that it was a cheap rip off. I never launched any sort of complaint, or made any comment after that. I'd be happy to compete against QBots. I'm not happy having to compete against myself.
  9. We have a new GUI too. Thank you, somebody using common sense.
  10. Ripping and changing a little bit of code then calling it your own is stealing. Also, why wouldn't he be scared of competition, it effects his sales which is his income.. I can tell you have never programmed before. What Dashboard posted was one small portion. He's whining about competition, which is just pathetic. SSF's file format is a HUGE part of the script. It's a script that makes scripts, and this is how it spits it out. How do you think Adobe would react if GIMP started saving PSD files?
  11. It's $14.99 lifetime and comes with a full website and 4 live support workers. It's hard to argue that it's expensive. Last week it was $25. Now that @GoldenGates script is coming out, you lowered it by 10 dollars. This is really saying something. It's a sale that we've been planning since October 11th. 834 people posted on our thread, and there were 105 likes asking for the sale. It had nothing to do with GoldenGates. Hmm... Anyways, stop being so butthurt Well that's an intelligent thing to say. My frustration roots from him copying my work and selling it, I'm sure most would do the same in my shoes.
  12. It's $14.99 lifetime and comes with a full website and 4 live support workers. It's hard to argue that it's expensive. Last week it was $25. Now that @GoldenGates script is coming out, you lowered it by 10 dollars. This is really saying something. It's a sale that we've been planning since October 11th. 834 people posted on our thread, and there were 105 likes asking for the sale. It had nothing to do with GoldenGates. I've already notified Raflesia, and he's going to look at it when he wakes up. And I've always said that SSF won't be a script made with Java, and that it's useful because it doesn't require an actual script writer to have to write the script for you (among some other related reasons).
  13. It's $14.99 lifetime and comes with a full website and 4 live support workers. It's hard to argue that it's expensive.
  14. He still originally had the same GUI which shows that he's been building it around my program, similar to how one could use an RSPS source (or at least ripping code out of it).
  15. I shouldn't have to fight my own product. And he shouldn't be able to profit off of my work by claiming it as his own.
  16. I'm pissed. Code sample of 'his' file format (available by him from the Script Tester's section): 0#0,0,0,0,0#Dat Flax Picker,null,null,null,null 1#0,0,0,0,0#GoldenGates,null,null,null,null 46#9,0,0,0,0,0,0,0#null,null,null,null,null 30#2272,3490,2729,3493,17,0,0,0#null,null,null,null,null 2#0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0#null,null,null,null,null 38#441,0,0,0,0,0,0,0#null,null,null,null,null 28#0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0#null,null,null,null,null 38#444,0,0,0,0,0,0,0#null,null,null,null,null 3#0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0#null,null,null,null,null 43#2726,3485,0,0,0,0,0,0#null,null,null,null,null 43#2729,3472,0,0,0,0,0,0#null,null,null,null,null 42#30,0,0,0,0,0,0,0#null,null,null,null,null 43#2731,3459,0,0,0,0,0,0#null,null,null,null,null 43#2731,3447,0,0,0,0,0,0#null,null,null,null,null 43#2743,3445,0,0,0,0,0,0#null,null,null,null,null 23#16681,0,0,0,0,0,0,0#Pick,null,null,null,null 38#555,0,0,0,0,0,0,0#null,null,null,null,null 35#15,0,0,0,0,0,0,0#null,null,null,null,null 43#2741,3444,0,0,0,0,0,0#null,null,null,null,null 35#15,0,0,0,0,0,0,0#null,null,null,null,null 43#2733,3454,0,0,0,0,0,0#null,null,null,null,null 43#2728,3467,0,0,0,0,0,0#null,null,null,null,null 43#2730,3477,0,0,0,0,0,0#null,null,null,null,null 43#2727,3485,0,0,0,0,0,0#null,null,null,null,null 43#2724,3493,0,0,0,0,0,0#null,null,null,null,null Code sample of my file format as of SSF 1.0 (which was released on a jar, the code can be copied from it, which is where I assume he's getting these things from): 1#0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0#null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null 4#1733,1734,1745,0,0,0,0,0#null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null 5#1745,26,0,0,0,0,0,0#null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null 2#0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0#null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null 15#1733,1745,0,0,0,0,0,0#null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null 8#104,399,0,0,0,0,0,0#null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null 10#0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0#null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null 8#100,454,0,0,0,0,0,0#null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null 9#0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0#null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null 18#0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0#null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null Explanation - SSF loads files line by line as if they were commands. It follows the format of: ACTION_ID#INT,INT,INT,INT,INT,INT,INT,INT#STRING,STRING,STRING,STRING,STRING,STRING,STRING,STRING What's exceptionally remarkable is that both his and my script have 8 slots each for ints. What is also interesting is that both start with action ids, then go to int data, then go to String data in the same order. Another interesting fact is that both scripts use the "#" character to separate these bunches of data, which has no significance other than it being a personal choice that I made a few months ago out of preference to that character. There is no legit reason for him to use "#" to divide the data other than a VERY coincidental thought that was the same as mine. My file format is just one way of HUNDREDS of possible routes that GoldenGates could have taken for his own script saving/loading, but it seems that his is an EXACT match to mine, which is extremely fishy. Another thing that I must mention (old evidence to add to this) is: His GUI: My GUI: GUI is nearly an EXACT match aside from slight changes to the names of the menus (instead of "new action", he made it "add action"). I'd like something done about this as @GoldenGates is clearly copying my work (not only the idea!) to sell it for profit. This is outrageous and something MUST be done. Thanks, Dashboard
  17. Pay money to do work? LOL
  18. Update as of Oct 28:
  19. Computer Science is great if you love math and problem solving I'm in Ontario and am planning on studying it at either Western or Waterloo next year. Big money in it too.
  20. Well for one this could be a big step for goldfarming in general, if we lack data we cannot make conclusions of what actualy gets us banned. this is an amazing idea. Yes, could save thousands of dollars in membership fees.
  21. The other day something struck me. Jagex does mass data mining, tracks our activities, and actively goes in game to ban bots manually. What do we do? We make our scripts check our construction xp, rotate the camera a bit, and move the mouse over a little. Obviously Jagex has a much more sophisticated approach, and they're winning the battle. So what do we do about it? I'm currently working on a server that gathers information from all users who are running my scripts, such as: Session length - This way we can get an accurate idea of how long the average session really is. I fear that sessions may frequently last over 12 hours, which would be a dead giveaway that you're probably botting. Session ip address - This will tell us how many bots the average ip is running at a time, and we can track an OSBot's user's ip as well to determine how often it changes. Something that Jagex is more than likely watching as well. How many people are running that particular script - This way we can get an idea of which scripts are being used the most, and track usage over time to determine when ban waves occur. The location of each bot - This will tell us where each bot is. If every bot is in Seers village, we might want to consider other areas to remove 'hotspot' locations. The world of each bot - I theorize that Jagex has found away to get all of the bots in a few worlds. If this is true, we will be able to get the count of every bot (running these scripts) per world. With this, we will be able to evenly distribute bots and not have them all crammed in one world. Jagex mod sightings - By tracking all Jagex mod sightings (players with a "Mod" prefix), we will be able to make every bot in that world hop to another world, and blacklist that world for 20 minutes. So if a Jagex Mod shows up in world 77, every bot in world 77 will switch worlds in a certain time frame to any other world except for world 77. Along with this, we can track where these mods pop up at, and get their names to see which mods are doing the bot busting. -- So how will we get enough bots to gather this info? I will be creating a line-up of free scripts designed for popular usage (such as woodcutters, miners, fishers, flax pickers, flax spinners, fletchers, smithers, you get the idea) which will all connect to one server. These scripts will all be written as if they were paid scripts, so they will all be flawless, and incorporate over the top traditional antiban measures. I will also invite some trusted script writers to add this technology to their popular SDN scripts to further expand the data. My question now is: So what do you guys think? I'd like some input before I go far with these ideas. Do you think it would work? Do you have any additional ideas on data we should collect? Do you have any other ideas for remodeling our current antiban measures? Thanks, Dashboard

Account

Navigation

Search

Search

Configure browser push notifications

Chrome (Android)
  1. Tap the lock icon next to the address bar.
  2. Tap Permissions → Notifications.
  3. Adjust your preference.
Chrome (Desktop)
  1. Click the padlock icon in the address bar.
  2. Select Site settings.
  3. Find Notifications and adjust your preference.