Dex

I've requested @Maldesto to look into it.

Hi there and welcome to OSBot!

https://www.virustotal.com/nl/file/8159ecf850934615d51507bb8b30e3e98c4baf74b4cafa074627b8d37c1355e9/analysis/1452070599/ I scanned the file and it seems to be safe.

Did this also occur recently?

I've requested @Arcus to post here.

Belgian* people are known as confirmed people.

U bettr say it's not true or I"ll revoke my vouch on ur mm service. edit: pls mald, no gravedig

Proof of the 2 def you got him according to the feedback, just because he's banned now doesn't mean he lied about the 2 def on the account.

There was a miscommunication on our end which made @Genii believe he was allowed to archive them instead of just locking them. However even if he locked them you would've been spam-notified about this. There's nothing wrong with wanting to keep the forums tidy.

Thanks for reporting this, he seems to banned for scamming on Sythe so I went ahead and banned him.

Oh dang I'm impressed, what kind of tablet do you use?

Oh damn man that looks bad, good to hear you're okay though. Goodluck man!

@Soekarno is banned offsite for scamming and ban evading, so not the first time he would scam. I went ahead and banned him. As a service owner it is your responsibility however to make sure the user gets refunded for the damage done by your workers.

Takes guts to have this kind of attitude and still breaking the rules yourself. Banned you instead for creating multiple accounts and giving yourself feedback.

No you weren't and you seem to be quite aware of what you did seeing as PA is the first thing you mentioned. This is you, right: https://gyazo.com/271e9fc6e488d7c9433c7f6daf72a401

I know the system against the feedback farming isn't full proof yet, we're still working on some things so we always appreciate suggestions. The reason why service owners are not allowed to receive feedback for it is because they enforce it as a service policy to let the payments go through them so they can farm feedback from every service request their workers complete, thus leaving the other party no choice other than using them as a middleman, creating unfair competition between service owners and actual middleman/verified middleman services. In my opinion free middlemen should be able to receive feedback for their free services as long as the risk is big enough, I think that even with a small fee it's going to make a big difference in the amount of people actually using a middleman.

We were already aware of him spreading this, he's already IP banned. Thanks for reporting.

Nerds

Please include a screenshot of the login screen, the wealth on the account and if you're the original owner.

There's a template to be followed when selling accounts, please check it out here and edit your post accordingly.

Yes, please send in a recovery request.

A lot of things can still go wrong in 4 days

His TOS state it is 50% refundable if you work for him longer than 3 months. So he isn't obligated to refund you even though the right thing to do would be to refund you.

I've seen the whatsapp conversation and I'm going to lock and archive this due to lack of evidence. The only evidence I've seen so far is that the service was terminated because @Salko wasn't able to provide sufficient supplies. If you happen to have any valid evidence (e.g. the wealth on the account before and after), feel free to PM me and I'll reopen this dispute.

Then I'm going to need those as well please,as long as it is the full conversation, it doesn't really matter what kind of medium you used to communicate.