My VPS has 4cores and 2gb ram, yet I can't run a fletching script because it uses up too much CPU power. Is this an issue with everyone else using a VPS with OSBot?

 

Can anyone recommend VPS', or tell me when this will get fixed? I have a feeling it's just the nature of the client.

 

 

Define "core", whos your hosting provider? What script are you using? Did Low CPU fix it or no?

My VPS has 4cores and 2gb ram, yet I can't run a fletching script because it uses up too much CPU power. Is this an issue with everyone else using a VPS with OSBot?

 

Can anyone recommend VPS', or tell me when this will get fixed? I have a feeling it's just the nature of the client.

Are you using a paid vps or did you set up your own windows VPS?

u bought a shitty vps lad

 

just cuz it says 4core doesnt mean its 4 core 4.5ghz. Could be 4 core 2ghz kek, also vps's are not solely you using it. It's most likely overstacked

 2ghz should run it fine, if its one dedicated core. Overstacked/oversold is probably the real issue at play here.

 2ghz should run it fine, if its one dedicated core. Overstacked/oversold is probably the real issue at play here.

 

Guy is a reputable VPS seller, he showed me the node that it was running on and it was 40% used. I am running Centos5 on it.

 

I am currently testing another VPS to see if it's the same, but I have a feeling it's OSBot.

 

Can anyone recommend me a VPS supplier? I want to see if it really is the VPS or not.

Define "core", whos your hosting provider? What script are you using? Did Low CPU fix it or no?

 

It's extrmescripts fletching script - other "low click" scripts work ok, but still at ridiculous cpu %. Low CPU? I'm not sure what that setting is, but I imagine a click-intensive script such as a fletching script requires high CPU power anyway.

 

edit: I'm pretty sure it's not the VPS because I am running another mirror mode at 80% CPU.. and that actually runs higher CPU% on my own PC than OSBot does. So go figure.

Edited October 22, 201510 yr by Dex

Well he is on a pretty strong dedicated server.  And we do not oversell, at all.  The server has plenty of logical cores as well as the virtual cores run other clients properly.  4vCores at 2.66ghz is MORE than enough to run it.  This is the CPU usage on the node he is on 

https://gyazo.com/dced8399f6112f0d7bcec26422a4a38a

 

 

This is a new issue, was running fine the other day, although nobody else has reported the same issue; however, I was able to reproduce the same error on a VPS that was on a less populated node.

 

There is MORE than enough CPU on my nodes to go around, as well as RAM.

The default client of osbot barely takes any RAM ...

I can easy run 1 client that only takes about 500-750 mb RAM

 

Mirror takes more then that though, so don't try that if you already having issues now.

 

Khaleesi

 

The problem is virtual cores vs real cores. 4 virtual cores are shared by many people, and since everyone on those nodes are likely botting OSRS you're going to run into some issues.

 

 

 

could you run unix bench and give us the results.

Or run injection

The problem is virtual cores vs real cores. 4 virtual cores are shared by many people, and since everyone on those nodes are likely botting OSRS you're going to run into some issues.

It's embarrassing that tr1b0t can run mirror mode with a lower cpu% than osbot can run stealth mode - did you even read the posts?

This was in stealth mode btw. Khaleesi this is a cpu issue not ram.

Edited October 22, 201510 yr by walterww

It's embarrassing that tr1b0t can run mirror mode with a lower cpu% than osbot can run stealth mode - did you even read the posts?

This was in stealth mode btw. Khaleesi this is a cpu issue not ram.

 

Well since its a cpu issue how about providing a unix bench result? to show the actual power of the server.

It's embarrassing that tr1b0t can run mirror mode with a lower cpu% than osbot can run stealth mode - did you even read the posts?

This was in stealth mode btw. Khaleesi this is a cpu issue not ram.

Injection uses fuck all resources for me. Provide a benchmark.

Also, type "w" into your Linux terminal before and during botting and share your results.

Edited October 22, 201510 yr by Bobrocket

Unix bench results:

========================================================================
   BYTE UNIX Benchmarks (Version 5.1.3)
 
   System: sv1: GNU/Linux
   OS: GNU/Linux -- 2.6.32-042stab108.5 -- #1 SMP Wed Jun 17 20:20:17 MSK 2015
   Machine: i686 (i386)
   Language: en_US.utf8 (charmap="UTF-8", collate="UTF-8")
   CPU 0: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU X5650 @ 2.67GHz (5319.5 bogomips)
          Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtualization
   CPU 1: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU X5650 @ 2.67GHz (5319.8 bogomips)
          Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtualization
   CPU 2: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU X5650 @ 2.67GHz (5319.5 bogomips)
          Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtualization
   CPU 3: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU X5650 @ 2.67GHz (5319.8 bogomips)
          Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtualization
   08:37:22 up 14:24,  1 user,  load average: 0.02, 0.47, 1.37; runlevel 3
 
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Benchmark Run: Thu Oct 22 2015 08:37:22 - 09:05:34
4 CPUs in system; running 1 parallel copy of tests
 
Dhrystone 2 using register variables       18970306.8 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Double-Precision Whetstone                     2963.8 MWIPS (10.1 s, 7 samples)
Execl Throughput                               2400.5 lps   (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks        458038.9 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks          159383.8 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks        876943.0 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Pipe Throughput                             1368363.0 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Pipe-based Context Switching                 211858.1 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Process Creation                               6069.1 lps   (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent)                   2744.4 lpm   (60.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent)                    531.6 lpm   (60.1 s, 2 samples)
System Call Overhead                        1755937.9 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
 
System Benchmarks Index Values               BASELINE       RESULT    INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables         116700.0   18970306.8   1625.6
Double-Precision Whetstone                       55.0       2963.8    538.9
Execl Throughput                                 43.0       2400.5    558.2
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks          3960.0     458038.9   1156.7
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks            1655.0     159383.8    963.0
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks          5800.0     876943.0   1512.0
Pipe Throughput                               12440.0    1368363.0   1100.0
Pipe-based Context Switching                   4000.0     211858.1    529.6
Process Creation                                126.0       6069.1    481.7
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent)                     42.4       2744.4    647.3
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent)                      6.0        531.6    886.1
System Call Overhead                          15000.0    1755937.9   1170.6
                                                                   ========
System Benchmarks Index Score                                         856.2
 
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Benchmark Run: Thu Oct 22 2015 09:05:34 - 09:37:33
4 CPUs in system; running 4 parallel copies of tests
 
Dhrystone 2 using register variables       23581924.6 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Double-Precision Whetstone                    10904.0 MWIPS (10.2 s, 7 samples)
Execl Throughput                               4419.4 lps   (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks        416221.2 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks          135223.6 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks        834986.7 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Pipe Throughput                             1744851.8 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Pipe-based Context Switching                 276023.7 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Process Creation                              11535.2 lps   (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent)                   4339.3 lpm   (60.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent)                    634.5 lpm   (60.1 s, 2 samples)
System Call Overhead                        1903998.1 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
 
System Benchmarks Index Values               BASELINE       RESULT    INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables         116700.0   23581924.6   2020.7
Double-Precision Whetstone                       55.0      10904.0   1982.5
Execl Throughput                                 43.0       4419.4   1027.8
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks          3960.0     416221.2   1051.1
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks            1655.0     135223.6    817.1
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks          5800.0     834986.7   1439.6
Pipe Throughput                               12440.0    1744851.8   1402.6
Pipe-based Context Switching                   4000.0     276023.7    690.1
Process Creation                                126.0      11535.2    915.5
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent)                     42.4       4339.3   1023.4
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent)                      6.0        634.5   1057.6
System Call Overhead                          15000.0    1903998.1   1269.3
                                                                   ========
System Benchmarks Index Score                                        1164.2

96% is much too high for a server of that capacity. Devs?

Edited October 22, 201510 yr by walterww