I FUCKING HATE how people "do not take responsibility for my workers actions". If they're one of your workers you have to be able to trust them for god sake. I don't see how all these big names hire people that they can't even trust

 

am i the only one that thinks the employer should be blamed or just the workers?

If you look at the most recent service announcement you will see this problem has been addressed -

 

http://osbot.org/forum/topic/55281-must-read-services-update-new-rules-tos-conditions/

I FUCKING HATE how people "do not take responsibility for my workers actions". If they're one of your workers you have to be able to trust them for god sake. I don't see how all these big names hire people that they can't even trust

 

am i the only one that thinks the employer should be blamed or just the workers?

 

Ive had some workers who scammed but i refunded all of the customers as im 100% professional ;)

I thinks people should be responsible for their own actions.

I thinks people should be responsible for their own actions.

 

That includes creating a shop and hiring workers. (I hope)

Edited July 2, 201411 yr by Nitrousek

Just make all workers pay 5mil fee which they can get back when they leave, if they scam, that 5mil can be used to refund scammed users.

 

Some shops already do this

That includes creating a shop and hiring workers. (I hope)

Yes, they are responsible for how their employees are handled. 

you have to have swag first

I thinks people should be responsible for their own actions.

 

As do I, considering this rule isn't upheld in other circumstances. Such as @Laz hires (for example) -

 

>She leaks the database, causing thousands to get hacked and lose everything.

>The only response is promoting another Administrator and an apology.

 

We're responsible for finding the user work as service owners, but not for the illusive actions that may occur as backlash in my personal opinion.

As do I, considering this rule isn't upheld in other circumstances. Such as @Laz hires (for example) -

 

>She leaks the database, causing thousands to get hacked and lose everything.

>The only response is promoting another Administrator and an apology.

 

We're responsible for finding the user work as service owners, but not for the illusive actions that may occur as backlash in my personal opinion.

 

Yes, I agree. Though keeps getting banned and unbanned .

I think the person who runs the bussiness is responsible for what hes workers do,

 

You should not hire people that you don't trust/know at all.

Edited July 3, 201411 yr by Khaleesi

What they've brought in is a neat addition, but they're missing one major thing.

What If the staff member that approves it gets demoted/resigns? 

That, would leave the service thread to be locked, and archived. 

 

Yes, the post will still have the badge, but if you aren't on the team anymore that means jack shit, because you don't have the power/say to approve something. 
I mean look,

Doesn't mean my shit's verified.

 

It's certainly something they need to look at, because this can, and would most likely be abused at a later date. 


But hey, that's just how I look at it.

(Yes, I have contacted a staff member to let this be known.)

Edited July 3, 201411 yr by Etoke