Tony21412341 Posted March 27, 2014 Share Posted March 27, 2014 Can't support this man, cause for one I do use the "Certain words" in my thread titles. And I have the same reasoning with Eliot, its the buyers responsibility to decide who they want to give their money to. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jeff Posted March 27, 2014 Share Posted March 27, 2014 Stupid suggestion, don't know how many times I've heard this. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Oliver Posted March 27, 2014 Share Posted March 27, 2014 Support @RoomScape Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ineptsta Posted March 27, 2014 Share Posted March 27, 2014 agree with this! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Markeoo4 Posted March 27, 2014 Share Posted March 27, 2014 Support!!!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RoomScape Posted March 27, 2014 Author Share Posted March 27, 2014 Can't support this man, cause for one I do use the "Certain words" in my thread titles. And I have the same reasoning with Eliot, its the buyers responsibility to decide who they want to give their money to.Then why do we have any precautions in the market? If that's the point, why have any buyer protection at all? Get rid if scam reports because it's the buyers fault for getting scammed. Get rid of ToS since it's the buyers fault for being stupid and trading. Get rid of everything. If a buyer gets scammed, it's their fault. Right? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Eliot Posted April 20, 2014 Share Posted April 20, 2014 Then why do we have any precautions in the market? If that's the point, why have any buyer protection at all? Get rid if scam reports because it's the buyers fault for getting scammed. Get rid of ToS since it's the buyers fault for being stupid and trading. Get rid of everything. If a buyer gets scammed, it's their fault. Right? No need to get worked up mate. I say we ban anyone who doesn't have 100 feedback from using the market, then there will be less scams! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RoomScape Posted April 20, 2014 Author Share Posted April 20, 2014 No need to get worked up mate. I say we ban anyone who doesn't have 100 feedback from using the market, then there will be less scams! Not a bad idea. While we're at it, let's restrict users from posting until they have 100 posts. Less spam that way. :P 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Eliot Posted April 20, 2014 Share Posted April 20, 2014 Not a bad idea. While we're at it, let's restrict users from posting until they have 100 posts. Less spam that way. Exactly! You've got the idea now. I see a safer, more secure, OSBot in the future. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BawsZ Posted April 27, 2014 Share Posted April 27, 2014 Let's all agree I am the most trusted and to just buy everything you need from me okay? ty Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Genii Posted May 4, 2014 Share Posted May 4, 2014 (edited) Support words like reliable and trusted have no weight and you are unable to give evidence as here on the internet you can pretend to be who you want. Also offsite feedback again is the same thing. Edited May 4, 2014 by Genii Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
